# Second-order Co-occurrence Sensitivity of Skip-Gram with Negative   Sampling

**Authors:** Dominik Schlechtweg, Cennet Oguz, Sabine Schulte im Walde

arXiv: 1906.02479 · 2019-06-10

## TL;DR

This paper investigates how Skip-Gram with Negative Sampling captures second-order co-occurrence information, revealing its similarity to SVD and explaining its effectiveness across various NLP tasks.

## Contribution

It demonstrates that Skip-Gram with Negative Sampling is sensitive to second-order co-occurrence, unlike PMI, providing insight into its success in NLP applications.

## Key findings

- Skip-Gram with Negative Sampling captures second-order co-occurrence similar to SVD.
- PMI is insensitive to second-order co-occurrence.
- Models react differently when given second-order information.

## Abstract

We simulate first- and second-order context overlap and show that Skip-Gram with Negative Sampling is similar to Singular Value Decomposition in capturing second-order co-occurrence information, while Pointwise Mutual Information is agnostic to it. We support the results with an empirical study finding that the models react differently when provided with additional second-order information. Our findings reveal a basic property of Skip-Gram with Negative Sampling and point towards an explanation of its success on a variety of tasks.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.02479/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.02479/full.md

## References

28 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.02479/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.02479