Retrieval of Chemical Abundances in Titan's Upper Atmosphere from Cassini UVIS Observations with Pointing Motion
Siteng Fan, Donald E. Shemansky, Cheng Li, Peter Gao, Linfeng Wan, Yuk, L. Yung

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel retrieval method that corrects for Cassini UVIS instrument pointing motion, enabling detailed analysis of Titan's atmospheric composition from previously unusable stellar occultation data.
Contribution
The study presents an innovative approach to account for pointing motion in Cassini UVIS data, allowing for the retrieval of chemical abundances in Titan's atmosphere from additional occultations.
Findings
Successfully retrieved abundances of eleven species in Titan's atmosphere.
First analysis of T52 occultation for hydrocarbon and nitrile species.
Method enables use of nearly all Cassini occultation data for atmospheric profiling.
Abstract
Cassini/UVIS FUV observations of stellar occultations at Titan are well suited for probing its atmospheric composition and structure. However, due to instrument pointing motion, only five out of tens of observations have been analyzed. We present an innovative retrieval method that corrects for the effect of pointing motion by forward modeling the Cassini/UVIS instrument response function with the pointing motion value obtained from the SPICE C-kernel along the spectral dimension. To illustrate the methodology, an occultation observation made during flyby T52 is analyzed, when the Cassini spacecraft had insufficient attitude control. A high-resolution stellar model and an instrument response simulator that includes the position of the point source on the detector are used for the analysis of the pointing motion. The Markov Chain Monte-Carlo method is used to retrieve the line-of-sight…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
