On a family of unitary representations of mapping class groups
Biao Ma

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new family of unitary representations of mapping class groups based on measured foliations, demonstrating their lack of almost invariant vectors and deriving related inequalities and classifications.
Contribution
It presents a novel family of unitary representations for Mod(S) and analyzes their properties, including invariance and classification up to weak equivalence.
Findings
None of the representations has almost invariant vectors.
An inequality for the action of Mod(S) on Teichmüller space is established.
A classification of unitary quasi-representations up to weak equivalence is provided.
Abstract
For a compact surface with , we introduce a family of unitary representations of the mapping class group Mod() based on the space of measured foliations. For this family of representations, we show that none of them has almost invariant vectors. As one application, we obtain an inequality concerning the action of Mod() on the Teichm\"{u}ller space of . Moreover, using the same method plus recent results about weak equivalence, we also give a classification, up to weak equivalence, for the unitary quasi-representations with respect to geometrical subgroups.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Advanced Algebra and Geometry · Finite Group Theory Research
On a family of unitary representations of mapping class groups
Biao Ma
Abstract
For a compact surface with , we introduce a family of unitary representations of the mapping class group based on the space of measured foliations. For this family of representations, we show that none of them has almost invariant vectors. As one application, we obtain an inequality concerning the action of on the Teichmüller space of . Moreover, using the same method plus recent results about weak equivalence, we also give a classification, up to weak equivalence, for the unitary quasi-representations with respect to geometrical subgroups.
1 Introduction
Let be a compact, connected, orientable surface of genus with boundaries, the mapping class group of is defined to be the group of isotopy classes of orientation-preserving homeomorphisms of which preserving each boundary components (without the assumption that it should fix each boundary pointwise). Throughout this paper, is assumed to satisfy and a subsurface of is allowed to be disconnected.
Given a discrete group , a unitary representation is a pair where is a Hilbert space and is a homomorphism from to the group of all unitary operators of [4]. Infinite dimensional unitary representations of mapping class groups received a lot of attention recently. In [20], the author considers unitary representations given by the action of on the curve complex associated to . See [2], [1],[12] for more topics in this direction.
The group acts on the space of measured foliations , which is defined as the set of equivalence classes of measured foliations on . As the action are ergodic with respect to generalized Thurston measures [16],[17],[14], [13] (see Section 3.1.1 for a brief description of the measures), one obtains a family of unitary representations by considering the induced action of on the space . It is quite easy to see that the family of unitary representations considered in [20] is a special subfamily. However, unlike representations studied in [20], Example 3.5 will show that some of representations considered here are reducible.
Definition 1.1**.**
Let be a unitary representation of a discrete group . The representation is said to have almost invariant vectors if for every finite set and every , there exists such that
[TABLE]
The main result of this paper is about the existence of almost invariant vectors for the representation associated to the action of on . The existence of such vectors for other representations of mapping class group has been discussed in [3].
Theorem 1.2** (Theorem 4.1).**
For a compact surface with and each generalized Thurston measure , the associated representation of does not have almost invariant vectors.
The first direct application of this theorem is the following:
Corollary 1.1** (Corollary 4.1).**
Let be a compact surface with and be a generalized Thurston measure, then , where is the associated representation of .
For the second application, we will obtain a geometric inequality of independent interests concerning the action of on the Teichmüller space of .
Corollary 1.2** (Corollary 4.2).**
Let be a compact surface with and be the isotopy class of an essential simple closed curve on . Then there exists a finite subset of consisting of pseudo-Anosov mapping classes and a constant , such that, for every point in , we have:
[TABLE]
where and is the geodesic length of .
For unitary representations associated to discrete measures on the space of measured foliations, some of them are irreducible and some are reducible. We will discuss irreducible decompositions (See Proposition 5.1). We will also use the same method as in the proof of the main theorem, combined with recent results in [8],[7],[5], to give a classification for a family of quasi-regular unitary representations, which is a stronger version of Corollary 5.5 in [20]. Recall that, given two unitary representations and of a discrete group , is weakly contained in if for every in , every finite subset of and , there exist in such that
[TABLE]
If is weakly contained in and is weakly contained in , then and are said to be weakly equivalent. By Proposition F.1.7 in [4], Definition 1.1 is equivalent to say that the trivial representation is weakly contained in the representation . We then have the following theorem.
Theorem 1.3** (Theorem 5.3).**
Let be a compact surface with . Let and , where and are collections of pairwise disjoint, distinct isotopy classes of essential simple closed curves on .
If at least one of and is not , then the associated unitary representations and are weakly equivalent if and only if and are of the same topological type (that is, there is a mapping class so that ). 2. 2.
Suppose is not . If , then is weakly equivalent to the regular representation . 3. 3.
Suppose is not . If , then is not weakly contained in .
This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 is devoted to preliminary for group cohomology with coefficients in unitary representations. The proof of the main theorem is given in Section 4. The proof is divided into two general lemmas: Lemma 4.2 and Lemma 4.5, and concluded by a technical statement, namely Proposition 3.2, concerning actions of subgroups of mapping class groups on . Section 3 is mainly devoted to this proposition and Section 5 is for irreducible decompositions and the classification up to weak equivalence.
Acknowledgment
This paper is originated in questions asked to the author by his Ph.D. advisor Professor Indira Chatterji. He wish to thank her for many valuable discussions, help and useful comments. He is also grateful to Professor François Labourie for providing a proof for Proposition 3.1 and to Professors Vincent Delecroix, Ursula Hamenstädt, Yair Minsky and Alain Valette for discussions related to this work. Finally, the author would like to thank the referees for their valuable comments which helped to improve the manuscript. The author is supported by China Scholarship Council (NO. 201706140166).
2 Cohomology with coefficients in representations
Cohomology and reduced cohomology. For a discrete group and a unitary representation , one can talk about both cohomology and reduced cohomology group of G with coefficients in . Definitions of cohomology and reduced cohomology of discrete groups with coefficients in a representation are standard, so we refer to [15],[2],[4]. We briefly recall that one defines following vector spaces for a unitary representation :
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where the closure in the last one is for uniform convergence. The vector space (resp. ) is the first (resp. reduced) cohomology group with coefficients in .
Almost invariant vectors. The following Guichardet’s theorem provides a way to determine if .
Theorem 2.1** ([15]).**
*Let be a finitely generated discrete group and be a unitary representation without nonzero invariant vectors. Then the following two are equivalent:
-
The associated first reduced cohomology is the same as the first cohomology, that is, ;
-
The representation does not have almost invariant vectors.*
One observation is that not having almost invariant vectors is closed under taking limit, more precisely, we have the following lemma.
Lemma 2.2**.**
Let be a unitary representation of and be a -invariant vector subspace of such that the closure . Then does not have almost invariant vectors if and only if the representation in does not have almost invariant vectors.
Proof.
Suppose that the pair , where is a finite subset of G and , is given by the condition that does not have almost invariant vector. Given any element , there is a sequence of elements such that as . Then, for enough large, we have:
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Now can be enough small, so
[TABLE]
Which completes the proof of one direction. The opposite direction is obvious. ∎
Another easy observation is that, in order to show a representation of group does not have almost invariant vectors, one only need to pass to a subgroup. That is,
Lemma 2.3**.**
A unitary representation of a group does not have almost invariant vectors iff there exists a subgroup of such that the unitary representation of does not have almost invariant vectors.
Amenable groups. A basic strategy in this article is to use the regular representation of free group of rank 2, so the following theorem is of fundamental importance.
Theorem 2.4** ([9]).**
For the left regular representation of a finitely generated discrete group G on , has almost invariant vectors if and only if G is amenable.
Remark 2.5**.**
Since is not amenable, the left regular representation of on does not have almost invariant vectors. We will regard as functions on vertices of the Cayley graph of with respect to a chosen generating set, and thus further identify with the vector space V, where
[TABLE]
3 Generalized Thurston measures and dynamics on measured foliation spaces
In this section we will describe the integral theory on the space of measured foliations and the action of subgroups of mapping class groups on the space of measured foliations. A subgroup of in which all elements except the identity are pseudo-Anosov mapping classes will be called a pseudo-Anosov subgroup.
3.1 Measures and theory on
3.1.1 Generalized Thurston measures on
The space of measured foliations of a surface is the set of equivalence classes of transversal measured (singular) foliations on . Using train tracks, one can show that has a piecewise linear integral structure such that acts on it as automorphisms (that is, preserves this piecewise linear integral structure)[22]. Therefore, in such local PL coordinates, acts as linear transformations.
A consequence of this PL structure is that can be equipped with a invariant measure , called the Thurston measure on . Moreover, this measure can be generalized to obtain a family of locally finite, ergodic invariant measures on for complete pairs , which will be called generalized Thurston measures. We present a brief summary of the construction of generalized Thurston measures according to [14].
Let be a multi-curve on , that is, is a collection of isotopy classes of pairwise distinct, pairwise disjoint essential simple closed curves on so that each curve has been weighted by . After fixing a hyperbolic structure on , one can think a multi-curve as a collection of simple closed geodesics on with labeled by a positive real number , where is the unique geodesic representative in . We will use to denote both the formal sum and the subset of . Cutting along , one obtains a decomposition into a disjoint union
[TABLE]
where is a collection of subsurfaces of with boundary smoothly embedded in . For
[TABLE]
with , the pair will be called a complete pair. For a complete pair , define
[TABLE]
where in which is the zero foliation on . The space can be embeded on via enlarging boundary curves [See [11], Exposé 6.6 for enlarging curves]. Denote by the image of this embedding. This set is endowed with the product measure , where is the Thurston measure of . Define also
[TABLE]
The inclusion induces a measure on , denoted by and supported on the set of orbits of , from the product measure .
Special cases are when and is the isotopy class of a non-separating curve, or when and . The corresponding measure in the case of is a discrete measure, denoted by and supported on which is regarded as a subset of , while in the case of it is exactly the Thurston measure on .
The following remarkable theorem indicates that generalized Thurston measures are exactly all locally finite, invariant, ergodic measures on .
Theorem 3.1** (Hamenstädt[13],Lindenstrauss-Mirzakhani[14]).**
Any locally finite invariant ergodic measure on , up to a constant multiple, is in the form of , where is a complete pair.
3.1.2 Associated theory over
The case of discrete measures. Recall that when , is the discrete measure supported on the set , where is regarded as a subset of . We will first deal with the case that is the isotopy class of an essential simple closed curve on and denote the measure by .
Let be the subset of vertices of the curve complex consisting of . By considering the Dirac measure supported on , one can define the Hilbert space . It is clear that is equivariantly isomorphic to . On the other hand, let = be the set of all elements in that fix , then can be further equivariantly identified with . These two spaces give the same unitary representation of , actually we have
Theorem 3.2** (Paris[20]).**
The infinite dimensional unitary representation of given by is irreducible.
Remark 3.3**.**
This theorem was proved in a more general setting for 1-multi-curves on , that is, with for all .
Thus, in particular, this representation does not have non-zero invariant vectors. Meanwhile, the irreducibility also allows us to describe more geometrically.
The first description of is classical. For , let . The function has compactly support if the cardinal of is finite. Define the subspace of as the set of elements in which have compactly support. As is discrete, the following notation will be used to represent : . Note that is invariant and the closure of in is then itself. This description will be used in the proof of the main theorem in the case of discrete measures.
The second description of needs more explanations. Let be the Teichmüller space of , and for each point of , define a function on by
[TABLE]
where is the length of the unique geodesic in the isotopy class .
Proposition 3.1**.**
The function defined above is actually in .
Proof.
It amounts to say
[TABLE]
Thus this proposition is a corollary of the result of [6] or [19] about the polynomial growth of simple closed geodesics. ∎
Let be the subspace of which consisting of finite linear combinations of elements in . It is also easy to see that this subspace is invariant. Also by irreducibility, the closure of is .
Remark 3.4**.**
The second description gives rise to a parametrization for via the Teichmüller space, thus it can be viewed as a reply to Problem 2.5 in [12] for representations under consideration.
For the case of and is a general integral multicurve with , Theorem 3.2 is not true in general as shown by the following
Example 3.5**.**
Consider the genus 2 closed surface , regarded as a quotient along boundaries of holed sphere with four disjoint open disks deleted. Let , where and are isotopy classes of two distinct images of boundaries. Obviously, there is a mapping class that permutes the ’s. Denote and , then we have the exact sequence:
[TABLE]
That is, is a normal subgroup of of index 2. This exact sequence allows us to define a self-map of the left cosets as follows. Write as . There are two invariant bijections:
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
*As , the set can be rewritten as , this reformulation induces a well-defined inversion .
A function on is called even if for every , and a function on is called odd if for every , .
*Define to be the subset of consisting of even functions and to be the subset of consisting of odd functions. It is easy to see that such two vector spaces are non-empty, closed and *invariant subspaces of .
Remark 3.6**.**
For any discrete measure mentioned above, the associated unitary representation has no nonzero invariant vectors.
The case of non-discrete measures. For general measures, we mention one remark.
Remark 3.7**.**
If is nontrivial, ergodicity of the action shows that the associated unitary representation has no nonzero invariant vectors.
3.2 Actions of subgroups of on
Train tracks and a construction of pseudo-Anosov mapping classes. For later use, we first recall some facts about train tracks and a construction of pseudo-Anosov mapping classes by Thurston. All discussions here are standard and well-known, we refer to [21],[10],[[11], Exposé 13],[23] for more details.
A train track in a surface is an embedded smooth graph with extra conditions on vertices. A train track is called recurrent if it supports a positive transverse measure, that is, a measure assigns a positive number to every edge. A transversely recurrent train track is a train track such that every edge has a nontrivial essential transverse intersection with a simple closed curve. A birecurrent train track is thus a train track that both recurrent and transversely recurrent. A maximal birecurrent train track is a birecurrent train track that cannot be a proper subtrack of any other train track. Any measured foliation is carried by a maximal train track. We only remark here that, for a maximal birecurrent train track , the set of all positive transverse measures on is a positive linear submanifolds, that is, a subset of some Euclidean space defined by a family of linear equations with the condition that all parameters are positive. For the torus , the set of linear measured foliations can be covered by four affine charts associated to four maximal birecurrent train tracks. We fix these four types of train tracks as blocks and denote them by . See [[21], Section 2.6, Figure 2.6.1] for such four train tracks in the annulus, thus in the torus.
We now sketch a construction of pseudo-Anosov mapping classes given by Thurston [23]. We only discuss Thurston’s construction for closed surfaces. For surfaces with boundaries, one can modify the construction without any difficulty. Let and choose two essential simple closed curves and on so that all connected components of are open topological disks. For each intersection point of and , one can assign a rectangle to so that has a flat structure and, with respect to this flat structure, both Dehn twists and act as affine transformations (since we have flat structure, we can talk about affine transformations) with linear parts given by elements in . An element in the subgroup of generated by and is pseudo-Anosov if it has a hyperbolic linear part.
We now mention some facts about the set of linear measured foliations on induced by the flat structure above. Note that unstable and stable foliations of pseudo-Anosov mapping classes obtained by Thurstion’s construction are in and is a closed subset of . If we arrange all rectangles mentioned above on the plane such that sides are horizontal and label the rectangles from left to right by , then a linear measured foliation is given by parallel lines of the plane and a train track in carrying has the form that the restriction of in each rectangle is one of and all such appearing in are the same. Therefore there are four types of train tracks, denoted also by , so that . A direct computation shows that linear measured foliations on induced by this flat structure are determined by weights on two edges of , thus each is parameterized by two free independent parameters.
Lemma 3.8**.**
Let be a compact surface with , then each is birecurrent and the set of linear measured foliations with respect to a flat structure constructed as described above is of null measure.
Proof.
It is obvious that each is birecurrent. We divide the proof of the rest into two cases according to whether is maximal or not. If is not maximal, then any measured foliation carried by is not maximal [21]. By [[14], Lemma 2.3], has null measure. If is maximal, then, as is a birecurrent train track, is an open subset of and thus every point in should be determined by weights on edges of . As remarked above that is determined by weights on two edges of which can be extended to obtain free parameters of . That is to say, is locally given by in whose coordinates is given by . Therefore, is a null set. Since , hence is a null set as well. ∎
Almost properly discontinuous action. We introduce a concept for a group action on a Borel space (that is, a topological space endowed with a Radon measure) which is weaker than usual properly discontinuous action.
Definition 3.9**.**
Let G be a group and be a Borel space. Suppose that G acts on X by measure-preserving homeomorphisms. We say that G acts on X almost properly discontinuously if there exists a G-invariant subset with such that G acts on properly discontinuously.
Example 3.10**.**
Let H\leq{\color[rgb]{0,0,0}PSL(2,\mathbb{Z})} be a Schottky group, then its limit set , as a Cantor set, has zero Lebesgue measure, and thus it acts on almost properly discontinuously.
Although the action of on are ergodic with respect to generalized Thurston measures, the action of subgroups of on is not always ergodic. The following proposition allows us to use properties of the “properly discontinuous” action.
Proposition 3.2**.**
For each complete pair , there exists a rank 2 free pseudo-Anosov subgroup of that acts on almost properly discontinuously with respect to the generalized Thurston measure .
Any such free group will be called a -rank 2 free subgroup.
The first case is when or each component of is , then this proposition is obvious by taking to be any free pseudo-Anosov subgroup generated by two pseudo-Anosov mapping classes (this works the same for non-integral multicurves as for integral multicurves). For other cases, we prove this proposition through two lemmas.
Lemma 3.11**.**
There exists a -rank 2 free subgroup of that acts on almost properly discontinuously with respect to the Thurston measure .
Proof.
If , then, in both cases, can be identified with and can be identified with . Moreover, there is a finite index subgroup of such that the action of this subgroup on is equivalent to the action of on , see [[10],Chapter 15] for the case of . By taking to be any subgroup given in Example 3.10 and considering the set , where is the projection, the action of on is thus almost properly discontinuous and .
For other , we deduce this lemma by first passing to and then using the result of [18] on limit sets. Let and be two independent pseudo-Anosov mapping classes obtained by Thurston’s constrcution. By the ping-pong lemma, one can construct a free pseudo-Anosov subgroup generated by some powers of and . As remarked before that stable and unstable measured foliations of pseudo-Anosov elements in are linear measured foliations and is a closed subset, therefore, by Lemma 3.8, the limit set of , which is defined to be the closure of the set of fixed points of non-trivial elements of with respect to the action on , has the property that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, one can define the zero set of [18]. By combining with facts [See [18], Proposition 6.1] that consists of no uniquely ergodic foliations and uniquely ergodic foliation has full measure, we know that has null measure. By [[18],Theorem 7.17], acts properly discontinuously on , thus properly discontinuously on . Hence acts almost properly discontinuously on . ∎
For , a complete pair is called a middle type if and there is a connected component .
Lemma 3.12**.**
For a complete pair of middle type, there exists a -rank 2 free subgroup of that acts on almost properly discontinuously with respect to the measure .
Proof.
We will follow the idea of [[14], Lemma 3.1] to prove this lemma. Fix any hyperbolic structure on and consider the continuous function extending the geodesic length function. Thus
[TABLE]
where is a compact set and, as pointed out in the proof of [[14], Lemma 3.1], is equal to for some finite set . Fix a free pseudo-Anosov subgroup of and take any compact subset . Taking small enough and large enough, one can assume . We now claim that
[TABLE]
Let and . We first claim that there is a finite set such that
[TABLE]
For every element in can be written as such that is bounded. If , then also has bounded length and all bounds can be chosen to be uniform on , say . Since is a proper map on (that is, the inverse of compact set is also compact), is then a finite subset of containing both and . So one has . By the discussion of the case , the set is finite which implies that the finiteness of . Now taking the measure zero set to be completes the proof. ∎
related cover. Given a group and a Borel space . Suppose that acts on almost properly discontinuously and freely. Examples for such are given by Proposition 3.2. By definition of almost properly discontinuous action, there is a null set such that acts on properly discontinuously. For any compact subset of , we will describe a “nice” cover of . Since is the domain of discontinuity of , for every in , there is an open neighbourhood of in with finite measure such that for all , one has . Thus there is an open cover of . By compactness of , choose a finite sub-cover of this cover. Label the sub-cover by and for each , consider . Starting from , form a family as well as . Delete from and denote the resulting compact set by . Then for , there is a family as well as . Delete from and denote the resulting compact set by . Continuing this process, there is a cover of K which can be written in the following formula:
[TABLE]
So can be covered by finite many pairwise disjoint measurable sets (we allow some of them to be null sets). This will be called an related cover of K, since, for each , is a family of disjoint sets that lie inside the orbit of some set.
4 Nonexistence of almost invariant vectors
Let , where is a generalized Thurston measure explained in Section 3.1.1, and be the associated unitary representation of . The main result of this section is the following:
Theorem 4.1**.**
For a compact surface with and each generalized Thurston measure , the associated representation of does not have almost invariant vectors.
By using Theorem 2.1, Remark 3.6 and Remark 3.7, we have:
Corollary 4.1**.**
Let be a compact surface with and be a generalized Thurston measure, then , where is the associated representation of .
Proof.
By Theorem 2.1, we only need to show that the representation has no nonzero invariant vectors. The corollary is thus concluded by using Remark 3.6 for discrete measures and Remark 3.7 for non-discrete measures. ∎
Let be the isotopy class of an essential simple closed curve on , and be a point in the Teichmüller space of . Denoting , where , and using the description of via in Section 3.1.2, the following inequality is easy to show:
Corollary 4.2**.**
Let be a compact surface with and be the isotopy class of an essential simple closed curve on . Then there exists a finite subset of consisting of pseudo-Anosov mapping classes and a constant , such that, for every point in , we have:
[TABLE]
We divide the proof of Theorem 4.1 into two lemmas. First we prove a lemma used for discrete measures.
Lemma 4.2**.**
Let be a discrete countable group and be a discrete set equipped with a action. Suppose that there is a rank 2 free subgroup of such that acts on freely. Then the unitary representation of associated to the action of on does not have almost invariant vectors.
Remark 4.3**.**
This lemma is well-known, we give an elementary proof here mainly for heuristic purposes.
Definition 4.4**.**
Let be a rank 2 free group and be a space that acts. Suppose such that the stabilizer of is trivial. The image of under the orbit map is called the 2-tree based at (with respect to ).
Proof of Lemma 4.2.
By Lemma 2.3, we can pass to subgroups. For the action of the group on the space and any point , consider the 2-tree based at with respect to .
Let be the subspace of consisting of functions with finite support. As is invariant and dense, by Lemma 2.2, it is enough to show that does not have almost invariant vectors. That is, we have to find with the property that
[TABLE]
Since , as mentioned in Remark 2.5, the left regular representation does not have almost invariant vectors, thus such a pair exists for the regular representation. Fix such pair for the rest of the proof. Here are two facts.
Facts:
-
For every 2-tree based at a point, is equivariantly isomorphic to .
-
Different 2-trees are disjoint and thus, if the support of and the support of are located in different 2-trees, then and are orthogonal.
These two facts imply that we only need to deal with functions on whose finite support contained in a single 2-tree. In fact, for every , if we decompose its support as
[TABLE]
where lie in different 2-trees and is defined to be the restriction of on such different 2-trees, then
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Note that is fixed. If the support of is contained in a 2-tree , by Remark 2.5, there exists such that
[TABLE]
Now for every , let be an element satisfying the above inequality. If two 2-trees correspond to the same , then also satisfies that inequality. As is finite, denote and so can be further decomposed, that is, such that where and correspond to the same . We claim that there exists such that
[TABLE]
Otherwise, since for all selected, we have
[TABLE]
then
[TABLE]
The second inequality is the assumption and the last inequality is inequality (4.1). Thus there exists a pair such that
[TABLE]
So the proof of the lemma is completed. ∎
Then we prove a lemma used for non-discrete measures.
Lemma 4.5**.**
Let be a discrete countable group and be a Borel space. Suppose that acts on by measure-preserving homeomorphisms. If there exists a rank 2 free subgroup of such that acts on almost properly discontinuously and freely, then the unitary representation of associated to the action of on does not have almost invariant vectors.
Proof of Lemma 4.5.
Also by Lemma 2.3, we can pass to subgroups. Fix a null subset of such that acts on properly discontinuously. For any point , consider the image of under the orbit map, given by
[TABLE]
Since the stabilizer is trivial, this map is injective. This is the 2-tree based at with respect to . Define to be the invariant subspace of consisting functions that compactly supported on . Thus as is a Radon measure. So as before, we only need to prove the theorem in the case of . For each supported on one orbit of a measurable set , that is,
[TABLE]
where is the compact support of and the union is disjoint indexed by , fix a point in and associate an element , where is the 2-tree based on , via
[TABLE]
Define
[TABLE]
where is the same finite subset of H as in Lemma 4.2. For , one has:
[TABLE]
where the second inequality is the triangle inequality. By Lemma 4.2,
[TABLE]
where is a multiple of the constant in Lemma 4.2, as in this case we have . If the compact set is not contained in one orbit, one can take an -related cover of , then by the orthogonality similar to Fact 2 in Lemma 4.2 and follow the last few lines in the proof of Lemma 4.2, one can also choose the pair , where is a suitable multiple of , to complete the proof. ∎
Proof of Theorem 4.1.
As any pseudo-Anosov subgroup acts freely on , by Lemma 4.2 and Proposition 3.2, the theorem is true for . When or is of middle type, it is concluded by Lemma 4.5 and Proposition 3.2.
∎
Remark 4.6**.**
The same trick can be used to show that representations of mapping class groups in the space of functions on the Teichmüller spaces with respect to Weil-Petersson volumes also have no almost invariant vectors. As one can show that such representations do not have non-trivial invariant vectors, we have the same conclusion about corresponding cohomology groups.
5 Classification of quasi-regular representations up to weak containment
5.1 Irreducible decompositions
As pointed out in Section 3.1.2, for unitary representations of mapping class groups associated to discrete measures on the space of measured foliations, both reducible and irreducible ones exist. By examining Example 3.5 carefully, one sees that, reducible representations have an irreducible decomposition. For any multi-curve on , where for all , we form . Recall that is a collection of pairwise disjoint isotopy classes of essential simple closed curves on . As before, denote by and the corresponding subgroups of . Hence is a subgroup of of finite index.
Proposition 5.1**.**
Let be a compact surface with and as above.
(1)
If the index of in is one, then the associated representation in of is irreducible.
(2)
If the index of in is , then the associated representation of in is reducible.
Proof.
(1) is obvious, since the representation is which is irreducible by Remark 3.3.
Now assume that . Let and , then is a equivariant covering space of of degree . So every function on defines an function on , and such correspondence produces a proper closed invariant subspace of , which implies the reducibility. ∎
5.2 Classification up to weak containment
We first fix some notations. Fix a hyperbolic structure on . Denote by and , that is, multi-curves on with coefficients all of s. Such multi-curves will be called multi-curves. For any multi-curve on , we will call the union of geodesic representatives of a geometric multi-curve and, for any , the representative a geometric component. Denote by the corresponding subgroup of , and by the associated unitary representation on . Let be the regular representation of the mapping class group of on . We first recall some definitions which can be found in [20],[4], [5].
Let be a countable discrete group and H be a subgroup of , the commensurator of H is defined to be
[TABLE]
A discrete group is said to be C-simple* if every unitary representation, which is weakly contained in the regular representation of , is weakly equivalent to the regular representation. Let and be geometric multi-curves, then and are of the same type if there is an element in such that . We say a subgroup of has the spectral gap property if the unitary representation associated to the action does not have almost invariant vectors. In this section, we give a classification for unitary representations of associated to discrete measures.
Lemma 5.1**.**
Given a multi-curve on and let be the number of its geometric components.
If , then is amenable. 2. 2.
If , then has the spectral gap property.
Proof.
If , then is virtually abelian, thus it is amenable. For other cases, as , one can cut along geometric components so that the resulting surface has at least one connected component that admits two pseudo-Anosov mapping classes generating a rank 2 pseudo-Anosov subgroup. Assume components admitting pseudo-Anosov mapping classes are labelled as , two pseudo-Anosov mapping classes in each and the associated rank 2 pseudo-Anosov subgroup are also denoted by , respectively. Note that pseudo-Anosov homeomorphisms fix boundaries. Then define two maps and on (thus their isotopy classes) by extending and . Hence the subgroup generated by and is a rank 2 free group. Moreover the action of on the set has trivial stabilizers. Otherwise, if an element in fix , then by the construction of , the geometric intersection number of and is nonzero and thus it intersects one of . We cut along so that becomes a family of isotopy classes of arcs. Since fixes , up to some powers of , it fixes each resulting isotopy class of arcs. But then it can be shown that, for some , there is an element in that fixes the isotopy class of an essential simple closed curve, which contradicts the assumption that is a pseudo-Anosov subgroup. By Lemma 4.2, we can conclude that has the spectral gap property. ∎
Lemma 5.2** (Theorem A in [5]).**
Let be a countable discrete group and be a subgroup of that has the spectral gap property. Let be a subgroup of satisfying , then two unitary representations and of are weakly equivalent if and only if is conjugate to .
Theorem 5.3**.**
Let be a compact surface with . Let and be two multi-curves on with geometric components, respectively.
(1)
If at least one of is not , then the associated unitary representations and are weakly equivalent if and only if and are of the same type.
(2)
Suppose is not . If the number of geometric components of is , then is weakly equivalent to the regular representation .
(3)
Suppose is not . If the number of geometric components of is not , then is not weakly contained in .
Proof.
For any multi-curve on , (see [20]). Given two multi-curves and with geometric components, respectively, such that at least one of and is not , then by Lemma 5.1, Lemma 5.2 and the fact that is conjugate to if and only if and are of the same type, we complete the proof for (1). For (2), by [8], if is not , the mapping class group is C*-simple. By the result of [7] which states that a discrete group is C*-simple if and only if, for any amenable subgroup of , the quasi-regular representation is weakly equivalent to the regular one. So combine with Lemma 5.1, we complete the proof of (2). The statement (3) is deduced from (2) and the definition of C*-simplicity. ∎
Remark 5.4**.**
The “only if” part of (1) is a stronger version of Corollary 5.5 in [20].
Remark 5.5**.**
If is one of , it is easy to show that, if the number of components of is , then is weakly contained in the regular representation . However, for other types of , we don’t know if is weakly contained in . And we don’t know what can be said about unitary representations corresponding to non-discrete measures on the space of measured foliations.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Jørgen Ellegaard Andersen and Rasmus Villemoes. The first cohomology of the mapping class group with coefficients in algebraic functions on the SL 2 ( C ) subscript SL 2 𝐶 {\rm SL}_{2}(C) moduli space. Algebr. Geom. Topol. , 9(2):1177–1199, 2009.
- 2[2] Jørgen Ellegaard Andersen and Rasmus Villemoes. Cohomology of mapping class groups and the abelian moduli space. Quantum Topol. , 3(3-4):359–376, 2012.
- 3[3] Jorgen Ellegaard Andersen. Mapping class groups do not have kazhdan’s property (t). ar Xiv preprint ar Xiv:0706.2184 , 2007.
- 4[4] Bachir Bekka, Pierre de la Harpe, and Alain Valette. Kazhdan’s property (T) , volume 11 of New Mathematical Monographs . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.
- 5[5] Bachir Bekka and Mehrdad Kalantar. Quasi-regular representations of discrete groups and associated C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 373(3):2105–2133, 2020.
- 6[6] Joan S. Birman and Caroline Series. Geodesics with bounded intersection number on surfaces are sparsely distributed. Topology , 24(2):217–225, 1985.
- 7[7] Emmanuel Breuillard, Mehrdad Kalantar, Matthew Kennedy, and Narutaka Ozawa. C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -simplicity and the unique trace property for discrete groups. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. , 126:35–71, 2017.
- 8[8] Martin R. Bridson and Pierre de la Harpe. Mapping class groups and outer automorphism groups of free groups are C ∗ superscript 𝐶 C^{*} -simple. J. Funct. Anal. , 212(1):195–205, 2004.
