Proximal Reliability Optimization for Reinforcement Learning
Narendra Patwardhan, Zequn Wang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a reliability-based optimization framework for reinforcement learning that enhances robustness against the reality gap, maintains data efficiency, and proves stability in classical control tasks.
Contribution
It presents a novel quantization of uncertainty and a switching routine to improve controller robustness in reinforcement learning.
Findings
Proves stability of neuro-controllers in static and dynamic environments
Maintains data efficiency comparable to reward-based methods
Demonstrates effectiveness on Cart Pole and Inverted Pendulum tasks
Abstract
Despite the numerous advances, reinforcement learning remains away from widespread acceptance for autonomous controller design as compared to classical methods due to lack of ability to effectively tackle the reality gap. The reliance on absolute or deterministic reward as a metric for optimization process renders reinforcement learning highly susceptible to changes in problem dynamics. We introduce a novel framework that effectively quantizes the uncertainty of the design space and induces robustness in controllers by switching to a reliability-based optimization routine. The data efficiency of the method is maintained to match reward based optimization methods by employing a model-based approach. We prove the stability of learned neuro-controllers in both static and dynamic environments on classical reinforcement learning tasks such as Cart Pole balancing and Inverted Pendulum.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFault Detection and Control Systems
