The Evolution of Luminous Red Nova AT 2017jfs in NGC 4470
A. Pastorello, T.-W. Chen, Y.-Z. Cai, A. Morales-Garoffolo, Z. Cano,, E. Mason, E. A. Barsukova, S. Benetti, M. Berton, S. Bose, F. Bufano, E., Callis, G. Cannizzaro, R. Cartier, Ping Chen, Subo Dong, S. Dyrbye, N., Elias-Rosa, A. Floers, M. Fraser, S. Geier, V. P. Goranskij

TL;DR
This paper reports detailed photometric and spectroscopic observations of the luminous red nova AT 2017jfs, revealing its double-peaked light curve, spectral evolution, and suggesting it resulted from a binary merger event.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of AT 2017jfs's light curves and spectra, proposing it as a common-envelope transient from a binary merger, which is a novel interpretation for this object.
Findings
Double-peaked light curve typical of LRNe
Spectral evolution from blue continuum to M-type features
Evidence of dust formation or IR echo at late times
Abstract
We present the results of our photometric and spectroscopic follow-up of the intermediate-luminosity optical transient AT 2017jfs. At peak, the object reaches an absolute magnitude of Mg=-15.46+-0.15 mag and a bolometric luminosity of 5.5x10^41 erg/s. Its light curve has the double-peak shape typical of Luminous Red Novae (LRNe), with a narrow first peak bright in the blue bands, while the second peak is longer lasting and more luminous in the red and near-infrared (NIR) bands. During the first peak, the spectrum shows a blue continuum with narrow emission lines of H and Fe II. During the second peak, the spectrum becomes cooler, resembling that of a K-type star, and the emission lines are replaced by a forest of narrow lines in absorption. About 5 months later, while the optical light curves are characterized by a fast linear decline, the NIR ones show a moderate rebrightening,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
11institutetext: INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, Italy 22institutetext: Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstraße 1, 85748, Garching bei München,, Germany 33institutetext: Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 3, I-35122 Padova, Italy 44institutetext: Department of Applied Physics, University of Cádiz, Campus of Puerto Real, E-11510 Cádiz, Spain 55institutetext: Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA-CSIC), Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, E-18008, Granada, Spain 66institutetext: INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G.B. Tiepolo 11, I-34143 Trieste, Italy 77institutetext: Special Astrophysical Observatory, Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhnij Arkhyz, Karachai-Cherkesia, 369167 Russia 88institutetext: Finnish Centre for Astronomy with ESO (FINCA), University of Turku, Quantum, Vesilinnantie 5, FI-20014 University of Turku, Finland 99institutetext: Aalto University Metsähovi Radio Observatory, Metsähovintie 114, FI-02540 Kylmälä, Finland 1010institutetext: Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Yi He Yuan Road 5, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100871, China 1111institutetext: INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, Via Santa Sofia 78, I-95123 Catania, Italy 1212institutetext: School of Physics, O’Brien Centre for Science North, University College Dublin, Belfield Dublin 4, Ireland 1313institutetext: SRON, Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584CA, Utrecht, The Netherlands 1414institutetext: Department of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands 1515institutetext: Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile 1616institutetext: Nordic Optical Telescope, Apartado 474, E-38700 Santa Cruz de La Palma, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain 1717institutetext: Institute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), Campus UAB, Camí de Can Magrans s/n, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès (Barcelona), Spain 1818institutetext: Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), c/Gran Capità 2-4, Edif. Nexus 201, 08034 Barcelona, Spain 1919institutetext: European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 2, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany 2020institutetext: Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 1, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany 2121institutetext: Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, James-Franck-Straße 1, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany 2222institutetext: Gran Telescopio Canarias (GRANTECAN), Cuesta de San José s/n, E-38712, Breña Baja, La Palma, Spain 2323institutetext: Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Vía Láctea s/n, E-38200, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 2424institutetext: Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow University, Universitetsky Ave. 13, 119992 Moscow, Russia 2525institutetext: Tuorla Observatory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland 2626institutetext: Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali (INAF), via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, I-00133 Roma, Italy 2727institutetext: Departamento de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile 2828institutetext: Nordita, KTH Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden 2929institutetext: Department of Astronomy, AlbaNova University Center, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden 3030institutetext: The Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden 3131institutetext: Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK 3232institutetext: Kazan Federal University, Kremlevskaya 18, 420008 Kazan, Russia 3333institutetext: Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, United Kingdom 3434institutetext: Dark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 3535institutetext: School of Physics Astronomy, Cardiff University, Queens Buildings, The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK 3636institutetext: School of Physics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland 3737institutetext: LSST, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA 3838institutetext: The Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, SE-10691, Stockholm, Sweden
The evolution of luminous red nova AT2017jfs in NGC4470††thanks: Table 1 is only available in electronic form
at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/qcat?J/A+A/
A. Pastorello 11 [email protected]
T.-W. Chen 22
Y.-Z. Cai 1133
A. Morales-Garoffolo 44
Z. Cano 55
E. Mason 66
E. A. Barsukova 77
S. Benetti 11
M. Berton 8899
S. Bose 1010
F. Bufano 1111
E. Callis 1212
G. Cannizzaro 13131414
R. Cartier 1515
Ping Chen 1010
Subo Dong 1010
S. Dyrbye 1616
N. Elias-Rosa 17171818
A. Flörs 191920202121
M. Fraser 1212
S. Geier 22222323
V. P. Goranskij 2424
D. A. Kann 55
H. Kuncarayakti 882525
F. Onori 2626
A. Reguitti 2727
T. Reynolds 2525
I. R. Losada 28282929
A. Sagués Carracedo 3030
T. Schweyer 22
S. J. Smartt 3131
A. M. Tatarnikov 2424
A. F. Valeev 773232
C. Vogl 20202121
T. Wevers 3333
A. de Ugarte Postigo 553434
L. Izzo 55
C. Inserra 3535
E. Kankare 2525
K. Maguire 31313636
K. W. Smith 3131
B. Stalder 3737
L. Tartaglia 3838
C. C. Thöne 55
G. Valerin 33
D. R. Young 3131
(Received Month dd, 20yy; accepted Month dd, 20yy)
We present the results of our photometric and spectroscopic follow-up of the intermediate-luminosity optical transient AT~2017jfs. At peak, the object reaches an absolute magnitude of mag and a bolometric luminosity of erg s*-1*. Its light curve has the double-peak shape typical of luminous red novae (LRNe), with a narrow first peak bright in the blue bands, while the second peak is longer-lasting and more luminous in the red and near-infrared (NIR) bands. During the first peak, the spectrum shows a blue continuum with narrow emission lines of H and Fe II. During the second peak, the spectrum becomes cooler, resembling that of a K-type star, and the emission lines are replaced by a forest of narrow lines in absorption. About 5 months later, while the optical light curves are characterized by a fast linear decline, the NIR ones show a moderate rebrightening, observed until the transient disappears in solar conjunction. At these late epochs, the spectrum becomes reminiscent of that of M-type stars, with prominent molecular absorption bands. The late-time properties suggest the formation of some dust in the expanding common envelope or an IR echo from foreground pre-existing dust. We propose that the object is a common-envelope transient, possibly the outcome of a merging event in a massive binary, similar to NGC4490-2011OT1.
Key Words.:
** binaries: close - stars: winds, outflows - stars: massive - supernovae: individual: AT~2017jfs - supernovae: individual: NGC4490-2011OT1 **
1 Introduction
Red Novae (RNe) form a family of optical transients spanning an enormous range of luminosities. This includes faint objects with absolute peak magnitudes from to mag, such as OGLE 2002-BLG-360 (Tylenda et al., 2013) and V1309~Sco (Mason et al., 2010; Tylenda et al., 2011), intermediate-luminosity events ( mag) like V838 Mon (Munari et al., 2002; Goranskij et al., 2002; Kimeswenger et al., 2002; Crause et al., 2003), and relatively luminous objects such as NGC4490-2011OT1 (Smith et al., 2016), that can reach mag. Objects brighter than mag are conventionally named luminous red novae111The alternative naming ‘luminous red variable’ was also used in the past (e.g., Martini et al., 1999). (LRNe; for a review, see Pastorello et al., 2019, and references therein).
Although the physical processes triggering these outbursts have been debated, there is growing evidence that RNe and their more luminous counterparts are produced by the coalescence of stars with different masses following a common-envelope phase (e.g., Kochanek et al., 2014; Pejcha et al., 2016, 2017; MacLeod et al., 2017, 2018). In particular, the inspiralling motion of the secondary was revealed by the long-term monitoring of V1309~Sco (Tylenda et al., 2011).
The recent discovery of LRNe suggests that common envelope ejections and/or merging events may also happen
in more massive close binary systems (Smith et al., 2016; Mauerhan et al., 2018), with major implications for the evolution of
the resulting merger. In this context, here we report the results of our follow-up
campaign of a LRN recently discovered in the galaxy NGC4470: AT2017jfs.
2 AT 2017jfs, its host galaxy, and reddening
AT2017jfs222The object is known by multiple survey designations, including Gaia17dkh, PS17fqp,
ATLAS18aat. was discovered by Gaia on 2017 December 26.13 UT (MJD = 58113.13, Delgado et al., 2017) at a Gaia -band magnitude
17.17 0.20. No source was detected at the transient position on 2017 November 30 down to a limiting
magnitude of 21.5. The transient was located at and
(equinox J2000.0), in the almost face-on, early-type spiral galaxy NGC4470.
The source was tentatively classified by the extended-Public ESO Spectroscopic Survey for Transient Objects (ePESSTO; Smarrt et al., 2015) as a type-IIn supernova (SN IIn) or a SN impostor (Bufano et al., 2018), and for this reason it was designated with a SN name (SN 2017jfs). In this paper, we show it to be a LRN, hence we adopt the label AT~2017jfs.
The distance to NGC~4470 is somewhat controversial, and the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)333https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/ gives a number of discrepant estimates based on the Tully-Fisher method, ranging from 11.6 to 34.6 Mpc, with an average value of 18.76 6.6 Mpc (corresponding to a distance modulus mag). Given the uncertainty in the Tully-Fisher estimates, we prefer to adopt a kinematic distance Mpc (corrected for Virgo Infall and estimated adopting a standard cosmology with = 73 km s*-1* Mpc*-1*), hence = 32.73 0.15 mag. This estimate also agrees with the distance 34.7 Mpc reported by Koliopanos et al. (2017).
The Galactic line-of-sight reddening is modest, = 0.022 mag (Schlafly & Finkbeiner, 2011). Our early spectra do not have high signal to noise ratios (S/Ns),
and therefore the host galaxy reddening cannot be well constrained. However, prominent absorption features of Na ID
are not visible, suggesting a modest host galaxy reddening contribution.
Later spectra with higher S/N show only a narrow Na ID in absorption centered at 5884Å (rest wavelength), hence
likely a feature intrinsic to AT2017jfs. For this reason, we adopt = 0.022 mag as the total reddening towards AT2017jfs.
3 Photometric evolution
The follow-up campaign started soon after the classification of AT~2017jfs, and continued for about 7 months. Photometry data were reduced following standard prescriptions (see, e.g., Cai et al., 2018), using the SNOoPy package (Cappellaro, 2014). The magnitudes are listed in Table 1, available at the CDS, which contains the following information: Column 1 lists the date of the observation, Column 2 lists the MJD, Columns 3 to 11 give the optical and near-infrared (NIR) magnitudes, and Column 12 reports a numeric code for the instrumental configuration. The multi-band light curves are shown in Fig. 1. The Sloan- light curve shows a monotonic decline after maximum, with an average rate of 6.5 0.9 mag (100 d)-1. The photometric evolution in the other bands is somewhat different. The -band maximum is constrained to MJD = 58114.8 1.8 (2017 December 27.8 UT) through a low-order polynomial fit (at mag, hence mag).
The -band light curve has a rise time to maximum of about 4 d, followed by a rapid decline (6.5 0.2 mag (100 d)-1) until 50 d. The light curve follows a plateau-like evolution until 110 d when it begins a faster decline (7.0 0.4 mag (100 d)-1) that lasts until it has faded below the detection threshold. The evolution in the Johnson and bands is similar to the band, although the -band light curve shows a low-contrast second peak, broader than the early one.
The light curve is remarkably different in the red and NIR bands. The transient reaches a peak at mag on MJD = 58115.6, followed by a fast decline (6.3 0.3 mag (100 d)-1) lasting three weeks and reaching a minimum at mag. Subsequently, from about 50 d after maximum, the -band luminosity rises again and reaches a second maximum on MJD = 58209.0, at mag. This second peak is much broader than the early one. Later on, from 110 to 200 d after the first peak, the -band light curve declines with a rate of 3.90 0.04 mag (100 d)-1. The -band light curve is very similar, with the two peaks reaching comparable luminosities.
The NIR light curves have a second maximum, brighter than the early one. As an additional feature, GROND (Greiner et al., 2008) observations reveal a moderate rebrightening of the NIR light curves from 170 to 220 d. Although we do not have very late spectroscopic observations to support this (Sect. 4), a late-time NIR luminosity excess can be associated with the formation of new dust or IR echoes, occasionally observed in LRNe at late phases (see, e.g., Banerjee et al., 2015; Exter et al., 2016). The late NIR brightening may also be a consequence of the transition to the brown (L-type) supergiant stage, as happened for V838 Mon (Evans et al., 2003; Munari et al., 2007), although this scenario does not comfortably explain the late blue-shift of the H emission observed in the late spectra of AT~2017jfs (see Sect. 4).
4 Spectral evolution
We collected 14 epochs of optical spectroscopy, spanning about six months of the evolution of AT2017jfs. Information on the instrumental configurations is given in Table 1.
Our spectral sequence of AT2017jfs is presented in Fig. 2, while the comparison with a few LRNe at similar epochs and the line identification are shown in Fig. 3. We remark that the transient lies in a crowded region of NGC~4470, rich in nearby sources. As a consequence, the late spectra
show some contamination from host galaxy lines.
The spectral evolution of AT 2017jfs follows a three-phase behavior, as observed in other extra-galactic LRNe.
In particular, we note a remarkable similarity with NGC4490-2011OT1 (Smith et al., 2016; Pastorello et al., 2019) at all phases.
At early epochs (until 3-4 weeks after the first -band peak) the spectrum of AT2017jfs shows a blue continuum, dominated by prominent H lines in emission, with a Lorentzian profile
and a full width at half maximum velocity km s*-1* (corrected for spectral resolution).
In this period, the temperature inferred from a black-body fit to the spectral continuum, , decreases from about K (in the +9.5d spectrum) to K (in the +23.4 d spectrum).
Emission lines from a number of Fe II multiplets are also detected, along with O I. The Ca II NIR triplet is also identified in emission, while the HK feature, which is usually prominent in absorption
in other LRNe (see Fig. 3, top panel), is marginally detected in AT2017jfs.
With time, the continuum becomes redder and the spectrum experiences an evident metamorphosis. During the second peak, from 50 d to 4 months, the red spectrum ( K at 82.3 d) is dominated by a forest of metal lines in absorption. The H lines become much weaker, showing now a P Cygni profile (see Fig. 2, left panel), although an over-subtraction of the narrow H emission from a nearby H II region may affect the apparent strength of the absorption. The spectrum in this phase is reminiscent of intermediate-type stars (e.g., late G to K types). We identify a number of metal lines (from Fe II, Ti II, Sc II and Ba II multiplets), along with the Na I 5889, 5895 Å doublet (see Fig. 3, mid panel). The O I and the NIR Ca II triplet are now seen in absorption. The velocity of the narrow Fe II lines deduced from the wavelengths of absorptions is about 450 km s*-1*. Some of the absorption lines visible at this stage are likely due to neutral metals, in particular Fe I at red wavelengths.
From about 5 months after maximum (hence during the steep, late luminosity decline; see Sect. 3), the spectrum changes again, becoming much redder ( K at 157 d) and closer to that of an M-type star. H is now mostly in emission, with an evident blue-shift of its peak (by about 400 km s*-1*; see Fig. 2, right), and a deep absorption at the rest velocity. While an over-subtraction of the contaminant H II region can be responsible in part for this absorption, the strong blue-shift of the emission is real. The H profile is similar to that of LRN NGC4490-2011OT1 about 200 days after maximum (Smith et al., 2016), whose bluest emission peak was shifted by 280 km s*-1*. Following Smith et al. (2016), the development of a blue-shifted component in emission would be consistent with an expanding, shock-heated line-forming region, possibly with aspherical symmetry. A peculiar geometry or, alternatively, the formation of dust hiding the rear emitting region (or both) may explain the late H profile for both NGC4490-2011OT1 and AT~2017jfs. Higher-resolution spectra and a wider temporal monitoring would help in discriminating the different scenarios.
As observed in similar transients (e.g., Pastorello et al., 2019), the late-time spectrum is also characterized by broad absorption bands. The features are generally identified as being due to molecules, in particular TiO and VO, although CN and CaH are not ruled out (see Fig. 3, top panel).
5 Evolution of the temperature and the radius
The double-peaked light-curve evolution and the major spectroscopic transition from an SN IIn-like spectrum to that of a late-type star are two remarkable properties of LRNe (Pastorello et al., 2019). The photometric information in particular can be used to study how the spectral energy distribution (SED), the effective temperature, and the photospheric radius evolve with time.
To this aim, the SED is computed for a few representative epochs, and the observed data are fitted by a single black-body function. The early-time (near the blue maximum) SEDs do not contain , , -band and NIR observations, while -band data are not available from about two months after peak. Finally, the fluxes in the blue optical bands are not available at very late phases, because the object was below the detection thresholds in those filters. The resulting black-body fits are shown in Fig. 4 (left panel). Until about three months after maximum, observations are well modeled by black-body fits, although from 3-4 weeks the line-blanketed -band sits below the adopted models. After the red peak, a single black body is not sufficient to accurately represent the observed SEDs in the blue region (see the inset in the left panel of Fig. 4). This happens when the NIR light curves of AT~2017jfs start a new rise before the object is in heliacal conjunction. This is possibly due to the contribution of a second black-body component peaking at longer wavelengths that cannot be properly fitted because of the inadequate wavelength coverage of our observed SED, in particular towards the mid- and far-infrared domains. The nature of this putative cold component is unclear. It is possibly due to an IR echo from distant pre-existing dust or, more likely, to the condensation of newly formed dust, as suggested by the early appearance of molecular bands in the spectra and the strong blue-shift of the late H emission (Section 4).
The evolution of the effective temperature is shown in the top-right panel of Fig. 4. The temperature remains roughly constant at about 7000 K during the blue peak. Soon after maximum, the temperature declines very rapidly, reaching 4500 K at 50 d. Later on, the temperature fades more slowly, down to about 2300 K at 215 d, although this value is uncertain, as it was inferred from a poor, single black-body fit (see inset in Fig. 4, left panel).
The temporal evolution of the bolometric luminosity of AT2017jfs, inferred by integrating the black-body fluxes over the entire wavelength range,
is shown in Fig. 4 (mid-right panel), and is compared with the pseudo-bolometric curves obtained by accounting for the contribution
of the optical plus NIR bands (uvoir), and the optical bands (opt) only. For the first peak we obtain a bolometric luminosity erg s*-1*, which is comparable to those of other intermediate-luminosity optical transients
(Berger et al., 2009; Soker & Kashi, 2012) or faint core-collapse SNe (Pastorello et al., 2004; Spiro et al., 2014). After the post-peak decline (with a minimum of
erg s*-1*), the bolometric light curve rises to the second peak with erg s*-1*,
and then declines again. After 150 d, in coincidence with the late NIR brightening, the bolometric light curve flattens to
erg s*-1*. We note that the bolometric luminosity of the blue peak in AT2017jfs is twice that of the red peak.
This is a major difference with NGC4490-2011OT1, where the red peak was twice as luminous as the early blue peak (see Pastorello et al., 2019, their Fig. 11).
This discrepancy is likely a consequence of the large UV contribution during the blue peak that was not accounted for in the pseudo-bolometric light
curve of NGC4490-2011OT1.
Using the Stefan-Boltzmann law, with the luminosities and temperatures estimated above, we infer the evolution of the radius at the photosphere
for AT2017jfs (Fig. 4, bottom-right panel). The radius at blue peak slightly exceeds cm ().
After a modest decline, the radius rapidly increases reaching at about 80 d, and then remains roughly constant until months.
During the last month of the monitoring campaign of AT2017jfs, we observe a further fast increase in the photospheric radius, which exceeds
at 215 d. This rise in the photospheric radius and the dramatic decline of the effective temperature at very late
phases favor the formation of new dust, like in RN V838~Mon (Bond, 2003). This is also consistent with the blueshift
of the H emission shown in Fig. 2 (left).
6 Discussion and conclusions
Pastorello et al. (2019) presented optical data for a wide sample of extra-galactic LRNe, all of them showing double-peaked light curves with maximum absolute magnitudes
in the range to mag. They discuss the observational similarity of LRNe with fainter ( mag) RNe
discovered in the Milky Way, and agree with Kochanek et al. (2014) and Smith et al. (2016) that all these transients are explained in a similar binary-interaction
framework. Most likely, they result from stellar merging events that occurred after the ejection of the common envelope. Lipunov et al. (2017) and MacLeod et al. (2017)
discuss the structured light curves of LRNe. A plausible scenario for the double-peak light curve of AT2017jfs invokes an initial mass outflow as
a consequence of the merging event, followed by a later interaction with the common envelope. This would produce the first luminosity peak and the
spectra resembling those of type-IIn SNe. During the second peak, the photospheric radius () is likely coincident with
that of the ejected common envelope. With the temperature decline, the H recombines, and the released radiation determines the broad red maximum.
According to Metzger & Pejcha (2017), the double-peak light curve of LRNe is explained with a modest mass ejection following the coalescence, with
the early peak being due to the release of thermal energy from the fast ejecta in free expansion along the polar axes. The late red peak
would result from shock-powered emission in the collision between the fast shell and pre-existing material in the equatorial plane. This would also generate
a cool dense shell, which is an ideal site for late dust formation, as likely observed in AT2017jfs.
Barsukova et al. (2014) provided a somewhat different interpretation. The rapid coalescence generates a violent forward shock which leads the photospheric temperature to largely increase,
producing the blue light curve peak. This phase is followed by the fast adiabatic expansion of the envelope with thermal energy carried out with some delay to the outer layers
producing the broad red maximum.
Kochanek et al. (2014) proposed that the wide range of peak luminosities observed in RN/LRN events (over 4 orders of magnitudes in luminosity) is tightly connected
with the total mass of the binary system, with faint RNe having progenitor systems of the order of and intermediate-luminosity events like
V838Mon of .
Luminous transients such as AT2017jfs, SNhunt248 (Mauerhan et al., 2015; Kankare et al., 2015), and NGC4490-2011OT1 (Smith et al., 2016; Pastorello et al., 2019)
likely arise from more massive binaries (up to , Mauerhan et al., 2018). While for AT2017jfs we do not have any direct
information on the progenitor system and the pre-outburst light-curve evolution, its luminous light curve would favor a massive binary
as precursor of AT~2017jfs.
A possible correlation between outflow velocities and light-curve peak luminosities for merger candidates is presented in Mauerhan et al. (2018), but
includes intermediate-luminosity red transients similar to SN2008S and M85-OT whose nature is debated (e.g., Botticella et al., 2009; Kasliwal et al., 2011; Kulkarni et al., 2007; Pastorello et al., 2007).
Since for AT2017jfs we measure an expansion velocity
km s*-1* and log , the object is positioned very close to NGC4490-2011OT1 in their Fig. 12, hence supporting
the parameters trend discussed in Mauerhan et al. (2018).
While RNe from relatively low-mass stars are expected to be quite common, luminous events are
extremely rare (Kochanek et al., 2014). In particular, following Kochanek et al. (2014, their Fig. 3), AT 2017jfs-like events would occur at a rate of
yr*-1* within 1 Mpc. Therefore, within a volume of 40 Mpc in radius, we should find about three events per year,
which is roughly consistent with observations.
In fact, while we observed at least four RNe with mag in the Milky Way in the past two decades (V4332Sgr, V838Mon, V1309~Sco and OGLE-2002-BLG-360),
LRNe brighter than mag were never discovered in our Galaxy, with only less that ten objects observed within
40 Mpc in the past few years.
Due to the limited number of objects discovered so far and incomplete data sets, RNe/LRNe are still not fully understood. Well-sampled, multi-band light curves extending to longer wavelengths and high-S/N spectra with good resolution are essential tools for improving their characterization. Discovering new LRNe at larger distances and RNe outside the Local Group is crucial for understanding the physics of these objects, and for providing reliable intrinsic rates. These are key objectives of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST Science Collaboration, 2009) and other future-generation surveys.
Acknowledgements.
We thank Rubina Kotak for useful suggestions. YZC is supported by the China Scholarship Council (No. 201606040170). MF is supported by a Royal Society - Science Foundation Ireland University Research Fellowship. NER acknowledges support from the Spanish MICINN grant ESP2017-82674-R and FEDER funds. S.Bose, PC and SD acknowledge Project 11573003 supported by NSFC. This research uses data obtained through the Telescope Access Program (TAP), which has been funded by the National Astronomical Observatories of China, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the Special Fund for Astronomy from the Ministry of Finance. S.Benetti is partially supported by PRIN-INAF 2017 ”Toward the SKA and CTA era: discovery, localization, and physics of transient sources.” (PI: M. Giroletti). KM acknowledges support from STFC (ST/M005348/1) and from H2020 through an ERC Starting Grant (758638). AF acknowledges the support of an ESO Studentship. AMT acknowledges the support from the Program of development of M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University (Leading Scientific School “Physics of stars, relativistic objects and galaxies”. CT, AdUP, DAK and LI acknowledge support from the Spanish research project AYA2017-89384-P, and from the “Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa” award for the IAA (SEV-2017-0709). CT and AdUP acknowledge support from funding associated to Ramón y Cajal fellowships (RyC-2012-09984 and RyC-2012-09975). DAK and LI acknowledge support from funding associated to Juan de la Cierva Incorporación fellowships (IJCI-2015-26153 and IJCI-2016-30940). The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys (PS1) have been made possible through contributions of the Institute for Astronomy, the University of Hawaii, the Pan-STARRS Project Office, the Max-Planck Society and its participating institutes, the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg and the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching, The Johns Hopkins University, Durham University, the University of Edinburgh, Queen’s University Belfast, the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network Incorporated, the National Central University of Taiwan, STScI, NASA under Grant No. NNX08AR22G issued through the Planetary Science Division of the NASA Science Mission Directorate, the US NSF under Grant No. AST-1238877, the University of Maryland, and Eotvos Lorand University (ELTE). Operation of the Pan-STARRS1 telescope is supported by NASA under Grant No. NNX12AR65G and Grant No. NNX14AM74G issued through the NEO Observation Program. This paper is also based upon work supported by AURA through the National Science Foundation under AURA Cooperative Agreement AST 0132798 as amended. ATLAS observations were supported by NASA grant NN12AR55G. NUTS is supported in part by the Instrument Center for Danish Astrophysics (IDA). This work is based on observations collected at the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere under ESO programmes 199.D-0143(G,I,K,L). This work makes use of observations from the LCOGT network. It as also based on observations made with the 2.2m MPG telescope at the La Silla Observatory, the Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT), operated on the island of La Palma jointly by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden, in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias; the 1.82 m Copernico Telescope of INAF-Asiago Observatory; the Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC), installed in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, in the Island of La Palma; the Liverpool Telescope operated on the island of La Palma by Liverpool John Moores University at the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias with financial support from the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council; the 6m Big Telescope Alt-azimuth and the Zeiss-1000 Telescope of the Special Astrophysical Observatory, Russian Academy of Sciences. We thank Las Cumbres Observatory and its staff for their continued support of ASAS-SN. ASAS-SN is supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through grant GBMF5490 to the Ohio State University and NSF grant AST-1515927. Development of ASAS-SN has been supported by NSF grant AST-0908816, the Mt. Cuba Astronomical Foundation, the Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics at the Ohio State University, the Chinese Academy of Sciences South America Center for Astronomy (CAS-SACA), the Villum Foundation, and George Skestos.
Appendix A Additional data
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Banerjee et al. (2015) Banerjee, D. P. K., et al. 2015, Ap J, 814, 109
- 2Barsukova et al. (2014) Barsukova, E. A., Goranskij, V. P., Valeev, A. F., Zharova, A. V., 2014, Astrophysical Bulletin, 69, 67
- 3Berger et al. (2009) Berger, E. et al. 2009, Ap J, 699, 1850
- 4Blagorodnova et al. (2017) Blagorodnova, N., et al. 2017, Ap J, 834, 107
- 5Bond (2003) Bond, H. E. 2003, Nature, 422, 405
- 6Botticella et al. (2009) Botticella, M. T., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 1041
- 7Bufano et al. (2018) Bufano, M., et al. 2018, Astron. Telegram 11135
- 8Cai et al. (2018) Cai, Y.-Z., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480,3424
