A gender analysis of top scientists' collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Flavia Di Costa

TL;DR
This study examines gender differences in collaboration among top Italian scientists, finding minimal overall disparities but some discipline-specific variations, with implications for science policy to promote female research excellence.
Contribution
It provides a detailed gender-based analysis of collaboration behaviors among top scientists in Italy across multiple disciplines.
Findings
No significant overall gender difference in collaboration propensity.
Males collaborate more internationally in Mathematics and Chemistry.
Females have higher domestic extramural collaboration in Physics.
Abstract
This work analyzes the differences in collaboration behavior between males and females among a particular type of scholars: top scientists, and as compared to non top scientists. The field of observation consists of the Italian academic system and the co-authorships of scientific publications by 11,145 professors. The results obtained from a cross-sectional analysis covering the five-year period 2006-2010 show that there are no significant differences in the overall propensity to collaborate in the top scientists of the two genders. At the level of single disciplines there are no differences in collaboration behavior, except in the case of: i) international collaborations, for Mathematics and Chemistry - where the propensity for collaboration is greater for males; and ii) extramural domestic collaborations in Physics, in which it is the females that show greater propensity for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
