# ALMA observations require slower Core Accretion runaway growth

**Authors:** S. Nayakshin, G. Dipierro, J. Szulagyi

arXiv: 1905.13104 · 2019-06-19

## TL;DR

Recent ALMA observations of young protoplanetary discs reveal giant planets at various separations, providing new constraints on gas accretion models and suggesting that slower core accretion growth better matches observed planet populations.

## Contribution

This study introduces a time-resolved population synthesis approach to compare synthetic planets with ALMA data, highlighting the need to suppress gas accretion rates for consistency.

## Key findings

- Standard gas accretion models overpredict Jupiter-mass planets.
- Slowing gas accretion by an order of magnitude aligns models with observations.
- Planet mass may correlate with disc age, awaiting future confirmation.

## Abstract

Thanks to recent high resolution ALMA observations, there is an accumulating evidence for presence of giant planets with masses from $\sim 0.01$ Jupiter mass to a few Jupiter mass with separations up to $ 100$~AU in the annular structures observed in young protoplanetary discs. We point out that these observations set unique "live" constraints on the process of gas accretion onto sub-Jovian planets that were not previously available. Accordingly, we use a population synthesis approach in a new way: we build time-resolved models and compare the properties of the synthetic planets with the ALMA data at the same age. Applying the widely used gas accretion formulae leads to a deficit of sub-Jovian planets and an over-abundance of a few Jupiter mass planets compared to observations. We find that gas accretion rate onto planets needs to be suppressed by about an order of magnitude to match the observed planet mass function. This slower gas giant growth predicts that the planet mass should correlate positively with the age of the protoplanetary disc, albeit with a large scatter. This effect is not clearly present in the ALMA data but may be confirmed in the near future with more observations.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.13104/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.13104/full.md

## References

69 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.13104/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.13104