Automorphisms of weighted complete intersections
Victor Przyjalkowski, Constantin Shramov

TL;DR
This paper proves that smooth, well-formed weighted complete intersections generally have finite automorphism groups, with some clearly identified exceptions, advancing understanding of their symmetry properties.
Contribution
It establishes the finiteness of automorphism groups for a broad class of weighted complete intersections, identifying specific cases where this does not hold.
Findings
Finite automorphism groups for smooth well-formed weighted complete intersections
Identification of obvious exceptions to finiteness
Contribution to the classification of symmetries in algebraic geometry
Abstract
We show that smooth well formed weighted complete intersections have finite automorphism groups, with several obvious exceptions.
| No. | Degrees | |
| dimension | ||
| 1.1 | ||
| 1.2 | ||
| dimension | ||
| 2.1 | ||
| 2.2 | ||
| 2.3 | ||
| 2.4 | ||
| 2.5 | ||
| 2.6 | ||
| No. | Degrees | |
| dimension | ||
| 1.1 | ||
| 1.2 | ||
| 1.3 | ||
| 1.4 | ||
| dimension | ||
| 2.1 | ||
| 2.2 | ||
| 2.3 | ||
| 2.4 | ||
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Automorphisms of weighted complete intersections
Victor Przyjalkowski and Constantin Shramov
Victor Przyjalkowski
Steklov Mathematical Institute of RAS, 8 Gubkina street, Moscow 119991, Russia.
HSE University, Russian Federation, Laboratory of Mirror Symmetry, NRU HSE, 6 Usacheva str., Moscow, Russia, 119048.
[email protected], [email protected]
Constantin Shramov
Steklov Mathematical Institute of RAS, 8 Gubkina street, Moscow 119991, Russia.
HSE University, Russian Federation, Laboratory of Algebraic Geometry, 6 Usacheva str., Moscow, 119048, Russia.
Abstract.
We show that smooth well formed weighted complete intersections have finite automorphism groups, with several obvious exceptions.
Victor Przyjalkowski was partially supported by Laboratory of Mirror Symmetry NRU HSE, RF Government grant, ag. № 14.641.31.0001. Constantin Shramov was supported by the Russian Academic Excellence Project “5-100” and by the Foundation for the Advancement of Theoretical Physics and Mathematics “BASIS”. Both authors are Young Russian Mathematics award winners and would like to thank its sponsors and jury.
1. Introduction
Studying algebraic varieties, it is important to understand their automorphism groups. In some particular cases these groups have especially nice structure. For instance, recall the following classical result due to H. Matsumura and P. Monsky (cf. [KS58, Lemma 14.2]).
Theorem 1.1** (see [MaMo63, Theorems 1 and 2]).**
Let , , be a smooth hypersurface of degree . Suppose that . Then the group is finite.
The following beautiful generalization of Theorem 1.1 was proved by O. Benoist.
Theorem 1.2** ([Be13, Theorem 3.1]).**
Let be a smooth complete intersection of dimension at least in that is not contained in a hyperlplane. Suppose that does not coincide with , is not a quadric hypersurface in , and is not a surface. Then the group is finite.
The goal of this paper is to generalize Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 to the case of smooth weighted complete intersections. We refer the reader to [Do82] and [IF00] (or to §2 below) for definitions and basic properties of weighted projective spaces and complete intersections therein. Our main result is as follows.
Theorem 1.3**.**
Let be a smooth well formed weighted complete intersection of dimension . Suppose that either , or . Then the group is finite unless is isomorphic either to or to a quadric hypersurface in .
Under a minor additional assumption (cf. Definition 2.2 below) one can make the assertion of Theorem 1.3 more precise.
Corollary 1.4**.**
Let be a smooth well formed weighted complete intersection of dimension that is not an intersection with a linear cone. Suppose that either , or . Then the group is finite unless or is a quadric hypersurface in .
Note that if is not an intersection with a linear cone, then the assumption of Theorem 1.3 is equivalent to the requirement that is not one of the weighted complete intersections listed in Table LABEL:table:K3 below.
We refer the reader to [HMX13], [KPS18, Theorem 1.1.2], and [CPS19, Theorem 1.2] for other results concerning finiteness of automorphism groups.
Theorem 1.3 is mostly implied by the results of [Fle81] (see Theorem 4.5 below). However, some cases are not covered by [Fle81] and have to be classified and treated separately (see Proposition 3.7(iv) and Lemma 4.8).
To deduce Corollary 1.4 from Theorem 1.3, we need the the following assertion that is well known to experts but for which we did not manage to find a proper reference (and which we find interesting on its own). We will say that a weighted complete intersection of multidegree is normalized if the inequalities and hold.
Proposition 1.5** (cf. [IF00, Lemma 18.3]).**
Let and be normalized quasi-smooth well formed weighted complete intersections of multidegrees and , respectively, such that and are not intersections with linear cones. Suppose that and . Then , , for every , and for every .
When the first draft of this paper was completed, A. Massarenti informed us that a result essentially similar to Theorem 1.3 was proved earlier in [ACM18, Proposition 5.7]. Note however that in [ACM18, §5] the authors work with smooth weighted complete intersections subject to certain strong additional assumptions (see [ACM18, Assumptions 5.2] for details).
Throughout the paper we work over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero.
The plan of our paper is as follows. In §2 we recall some preliminary facts on weighted complete intersections. In §3 we show uniqueness of presentation of a variety as a weighted complete intersection, that is, we prove Proposition 1.5. Finally, in §4 we prove Theorem 1.3 and Corollary 1.4.
We are grateful to B. Fu, B. van Geemin, A. Kuznetsov, A. Massarenti, and T. Sano for useful discussions. We also thank the referee for his suggestions regarding the first draft of the paper.
2. Preliminaries
In this section we recall the basic properties of weighted complete intersections. We refer the reader to [Do82] and [IF00] for more details. Some properties of smooth weighted complete intersections can be also found in the earlier paper [Mo75].
Let be positive integers. Consider the graded algebra , where the grading is defined by assigning the weights to the variables . Put
[TABLE]
The weighted projective space is said to be well formed if the greatest common divisor of any of the weights is . Every weighted projective space is isomorphic to a well formed one, see [Do82, 1.3.1]. A subvariety is said to be well formed if is well formed and
[TABLE]
where the dimension of the empty set is defined to be .
We say that a subvariety of codimension is a weighted complete intersection of multidegree if its weighted homogeneous ideal in is generated by a regular sequence of homogeneous elements of degrees . This is equivalent to the requirement that the codimension of (every irreducible component of) the variety equals the (minimal) number of generators of the weighted homogeneous ideal of , cf. [Ha77, Theorem II.8.21A(c)]. Note that can be thought of as a weighted complete intersection of codimension [math] in itself; this gives us a smooth Fano variety if and only if .
Definition 2.1** (see [IF00, Definition 6.3]).**
Let be the natural projection to the weighted projective space. A subvariety is called quasi-smooth if is smooth.
Note that a smooth well formed weighted complete intersection is always quasi-smooth, see [PSh16, Corollary 2.14].
The following definition describes weighted complete intersections that are to a certain extent analogous to complete intersections in a usual projective space that are contained in a hyperplane.
Definition 2.2** (cf. [IF00, Definition 6.5]).**
A weighted complete intersection is said to be an intersection with a linear cone if one has for some and .
Remark 2.3*.*
A general quasi-smooth well formed weighted complete intersection is isomorphic to a quasi-smooth well formed weighted complete intersection that is not an intersection with a linear cone, cf. [PSh16, Remark 5.2]. Note however that this does not hold without the generality assumption. For instance, a general weighted complete intersection of bidegree in is isomorphic to a quartic hypersurface in , while certain weighted complete intersections of this type are isomorphic to double covers of an -dimensional quadric branched over an intersection with a quartic.
Given a subvariety , we denote by the restriction of the sheaf to , see [Do82, 1.4.1]. Note that the sheaf may be not invertible. However, if is well formed, then is a well-defined divisorial sheaf on . Furthermore, if is well formed and smooth, then is a line bundle on .
Lemma 2.4** ([Ok16, Remark 4.2], [PST17, Proposition 2.3], cf. [Mo75, Theorem 3.7]).**
Let be a quasi-smooth well formed weighted complete intersection of dimension at least . Then the class of the divisorial sheaf generates the group of classes of Weil divisors on . In particular, under the additional assumption that is smooth, the class of the line bundle generates the group .
One can describe the canonical class of a weighted complete intersection. For a weighted complete intersection of multidegree in , define
[TABLE]
Let be the dualizing sheaf on .
Theorem 2.5** (see [Do82, Theorem 3.3.4], [IF00, 6.14]).**
Let be a quasi-smooth well formed weighted complete intersection. Then
[TABLE]
Using the bounds on numerical invariants of smooth weighted complete intersections found in [CCC11, Theorem 1.3], [PSh16, Theorem 1.1], and [PST17, Corollary 5.3(i)], one can easily obtain the classically known lists of all smooth Fano weighted complete intersections of small dimensions. Namely, we have the following.
Lemma 2.6**.**
Let be a smooth well formed Fano weighted complete intersection of dimension at most in that is not an intersection with a linear cone. Then is one of the varieties listed in Table LABEL:table:dim_12.
Remark 2.7*.*
Let be a smooth well formed Fano weighted complete intersection of dimension . If we do not assume that is not an intersection with a linear cone, we cannot use the classification provided by Lemma 2.6. However, Lemma 2.6 applied together with Remark 2.3 shows that if , then is a del Pezzo surface of (anticanonical) degree at most .
Recall that the Fano index of a Fano variety is defined as the maximal integer such that the canonical class is divisible by in the Picard group of . Theorem 2.5 and Lemmas 2.4 and 2.6 imply the following.
Corollary 2.8**.**
Let be a smooth Fano well formed weighted complete intersection of dimension at least . Then the Fano index of equals .
Proof.
Suppose that . Note that the Fano index is constant in the family of smooth weighted complete intersections of a given multidegree in a given weighted projective space. Similarly, is constant in such a family. Thus, by Remark 2.3 we may assume that is not an intersection with a linear cone. Now the assertion follows from the classification provided in Lemma 2.6.
If , then we apply Theorem 2.5 together with Lemma 2.4. ∎
Note that the assertion of Corollary 2.8 fails in dimension : if is a conic in , then , while the Fano index of equals .
Lemma 2.9**.**
Let be a smooth well formed weighted complete intersection of multidegree . Then a general weighted complete intersection of multidegree in is smooth and well formed, and .
Proof.
Straightforward. ∎
For the converse of Lemma 2.9, see [PST17, Theorem 1.2].
Similarly to Lemma 2.6, we can classify three-dimensional smooth well formed Fano weighted complete intersections that are not intersections with a linear cone (see [PSh18, Table 2]). This together with Lemma 2.9 allows us to classify smooth well formed weighted complete intersections of dimension up to with trivial canonical class.
Lemma 2.10**.**
Let be a smooth well formed weighted complete intersection of dimension at most in that is not an intersection with a linear cone. Suppose that . Then is one of the varieties listed in Table LABEL:table:K3.
Remark 2.11*.*
Note that each of the four families of elliptic curves listed in Table LABEL:table:K3 in fact contains all elliptic curves up to isomorphism. This is not the case for surfaces. For instance, a general member of the family 2.2 in Table LABEL:table:K3 does not appear in the family 2.1 due to degree reasons.
3. Uniqueness of embeddings
In this section we prove Proposition 1.5. Let us start with a couple of facts that are well known and can be proved similarly to their analogs for complete intersections in the usual projective space. However, we provide their proofs for the reader’s convenience.
The proof of the following was suggested to us by A. Kuznetsov.
Lemma 3.1**.**
Let be a subvariety. Let be a complement of the affine cone over to its vertex, and let be the projection. Then one has
[TABLE]
Proof.
Denote the polynomial ring by and let
[TABLE]
Let
[TABLE]
be the relative spectrum. Since , one obtains the map
[TABLE]
which is a weighted blow up of the origin (with weights ). Cutting out the origin one gets the isomorphism
[TABLE]
Consider the fibered product
[TABLE]
Taking into account that by definition, we obtain an isomorphism
[TABLE]
and the assertion of the lemma follows. ∎
For a subvariety , we define the Poincaré series
[TABLE]
The proof of the following fact was kindly shared with us by T. Sano.
Proposition 3.2** (see [Do82, Theorem 3.4.4], [PST17, Lemma 2.4], [Do82, Theorem 3.2.4(iii)]).**
Let be a weighted complete intersection of multidegree . The following assertions hold.
- (i)
One has
[TABLE]
- (ii)
One has for all and all .
Proof.
Denote the graded polynomial ring by , denote the weighted homogeneous ideal that defines by , and put , so that . From regularity of the sequence it easily follows that
[TABLE]
where is the -th graded component of .
Denote the affine cone
[TABLE]
over by . By construction, one has an isomorphism of graded algebras
[TABLE]
Following Lemma 3.1 denote the complement of to its vertex by . Consider the local cohomology groups , see, for instance, [Ha67, p. 2, Definition]. We have the exact sequence
[TABLE]
see [Ha67, Corollary 1.9]. Since is a complete intersection in the affine space, it is Cohen–Macaulay. Therefore, by [Ha67, Proposition 3.7] and [Ha67, Theorem 3.8] one has
[TABLE]
for all . Hence, we obtain an isomorphism
[TABLE]
for all .
Finally, denote the natural projection by . Then
[TABLE]
for all . On the other hand, by Lemma 3.1 we have
[TABLE]
For , we combine the isomorphisms (3.2), (3.3), (3.4), and (3.5) to obtain an isomorphism of graded algebras
[TABLE]
This together with (3.1) gives assertion (i).
For , we combine the isomorphisms (3.3), (3.4), and (3.5) to obtain an isomorphism
[TABLE]
Since is an affine variety, we have for all , see for instance [Ha77, Theorem III.3.5]. This proves assertion (ii). ∎
Proposition 3.2(i) implies the following property that can be considered as an analog of linear normality for usual complete intersections.
Corollary 3.3**.**
Let be a quasi-smooth well formed weighted complete intersection. Then the restriction map
[TABLE]
is surjective for every .
Proof.
The dimension of the image of the restriction map is computed by the coefficient in the Poincaré series (3.1). On the other hand, by Proposition 3.2(i) this coefficient also equals the dimension of . ∎
To proceed, we will need an elementary observation.
Lemma 3.4** (see [IF00, Lemma 18.3]).**
Let and be positive integers, and and be non-negative integers. Let , , , and be positive integers. Suppose that
[TABLE]
as rational functions in the variable . Suppose that for all and , and for all and . Then , , for every , and for every .
Proof.
Note that numerators and denominators of the rational functions in the left and the right hand sides of (3.6) may have common divisors (for instance, if some is divisible by some , or another way around). To prove the assertion, we will keep track of the numbers that are roots of either the numerator or the denominator, but not both of them.
Observe that equality (3.6) is equivalent to the equality obtained from (3.6) by interchanging the collections , with , , respectively. Thus we may assume that is the maximal number among , , , and . By assumption we know that . Let be a primitive -th root of unity. Then is a root of the numerator of the left hand side of (3.6) but not the root of its denominator. Hence is a root of the numerator of the right hand side of (3.6) as well. Since for all , we see that is divisible by . Cancelling the factor from (3.6), we complete the proof of the lemma by induction. ∎
Now we prove the main result of this section.
Proof of Proposition 1.5.
By Lemma 2.4, the group is generated by the class of the line bundle , while the group is generated by the class of the line bundle . Therefore, we see from Proposition 3.2(i) that
[TABLE]
Since neither nor is an intersection with a linear cone, the required assertion follows from Lemma 3.4. ∎
Remark 3.5*.*
The assertion of Proposition 1.5 also holds for smooth Fano weighted complete intersections of dimension . This follows from their explicit classification, see Lemma 2.6. Note however that the assertion fails in dimension . Indeed, a conic in is isomorphic to (which can be considered as a complete intersection of codimension [math] in itself).
Remark 3.6*.*
We point out that the assumption that is Fano is essential for the validity of Proposition 1.5 in dimension . For instance, there exist smooth quartics in that also have a structure of a double cover of branched in a sextic curve, see e.g. [MaMo63, Proof of Theorem 4]. Similarly, by Remark 2.11 the assertion of Proposition 1.5 fails for elliptic curves.
We do not know if the assertion of Proposition 1.5 holds in dimension in the case when and are quasi-smooth del Pezzo surfaces. We point out that the assumption that alone is quasi-smooth is not enough for this. Indeed, the weighted projective plane (which can be considered as a quasi-smooth well formed weighted complete intersection of codimension [math] in itself) can be embedded as a quadratic cone into (which is not quasi-smooth).
In the proof of Theorem 1.3, we will need a classification of weighted complete intersections of large Fano index.
Proposition 3.7** (cf. [PSh18, Theorem 2.7]).**
Let be a smooth well formed Fano weighted complete intersection of dimension . Then
- (i)
one has ;
- (ii)
if , then ;
- (iii)
if , then is isomorphic to a quadric in ;
- (iv)
if and , then is isomorphic to a hypersurface of degree in , or to a hypersurface of degree in , or to a cubic hypersurface in , or to an intersection of two quadrics in .
Proof.
Recall that equals the Fano index of by Corollary 2.8. By [IP99, Corollary 3.1.15], we know that ; if , then is isomorphic to ; and if , then is isomorphic to a quadric in . This proves assertions (i), (ii), and (iii).
Now suppose that and . Note that by Lemma 2.4. Thus it follows from the classification of smooth Fano varieties of Fano index (see [Fu80-84] or [IP99, Theorem 3.2.5]) that is isomorphic either to one of the weighted complete intersections listed in assertion (iv), or to a linear section of the Grassmannian in its Plücker embedding.
It remains to show that a weighted complete intersection cannot be isomorphic to a linear section of the Grassmannian . Suppose that is isomorphic to such a variety. Then . If , then the Fano index of equals and its anticanonical degree is equal to . If , then the Fano index of equals and its anticanonical degree is equal to . In both cases we see from Remark 2.3 that there exists a smooth weighted complete intersection with the same and that is not an intersection with a linear cone. This is impossible by a classification of smooth Fano weighted complete intersections of dimensions and , see [PSh18, Table 2] (cf. [IP99, §12]) and [PSh16, Table 1], respectively.
Therefore, we see that . Recall that
[TABLE]
Thus, Lefschetz hyperplane section theorem implies that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, since is a weighted complete intersection of dimension greater than , one has by the Lefschetz-type theorem for complete intersections in toric varieties, see [Ma99, Proposition 1.4]. The obtained contradiction completes the proof of assertion (iv). ∎
Proposition 1.5 allows us to prove more precise classification results concerning Fano weighted complete intersections (which we will not use directly in our further proofs).
Corollary 3.8**.**
Let be a smooth well formed Fano weighted complete intersection of dimension that is not an intersection with a linear cone. Then
- (i)
if , then ;
- (ii)
if , then is a quadric in ;
- (iii)
if , then is either a hypersurface of degree in , or a hypersurface of degree in , or a cubic hypersurface in , or an intersection of two quadrics in .
Proof.
Assertions (i) and (ii) follow from assertions (ii) and (iii) of Proposition 3.7, respectively, applied together with Proposition 1.5. If , assertion (iii) follows from Lemma 2.6. If , assertion (iii) follows from Proposition 3.7(iv) and Proposition 1.5. ∎
Remark 3.9*.*
An alternative way to prove Corollary 3.8 (which in turn can be used to deduce Proposition 3.7) is by induction on dimension using the classification of smooth well formed Fano weighted complete intersections of low dimension (say, one provided by Lemma 2.6) together with [PST17, Theorem 1.2].
4. Automorphisms
In this section we prove Theorem 1.3.
Let be a weighted projective space. For any subvariety , we denote by the stabilizer of in . We denote by the image of under the restriction map to . In other words, the group consists of automorphisms of induced by automorphisms of .
We start with a general result that is well known to experts (see for instance [KPS18, Lemma 3.1.2]) and that was pointed out to us by A. Massarenti.
Lemma 4.1**.**
Let be a normal variety, let be a very ample Weil divisor on , and let be the class of in . Denote by the stabilizer of in . Then is a linear algebraic group.
Corollary 4.2**.**
Let be a quasi-smooth well formed weighted complete intersection of dimension . Suppose that either , or . Then is a linear algebraic group.
Proof.
Note that the divisor class is -invariant. Moreover, if , then either or is ample by Theorem 2.5. On the other hand, if , then by Lemma 2.4, so that an ample generator of is -invariant. In both cases we see that preserves some ample (and thus also some very ample) divisor class on . Hence is a linear algebraic group by Lemma 4.1. ∎
The following lemma will not be used in the proof of Theorem 1.3, but will allow us to prove its (weaker) analog that applies to a slightly wider class of smooth weighted complete intersections, see Corollary 4.7(ii) below.
Lemma 4.3**.**
Let be a subvariety of . Then is a linear algebraic group.
Proof.
The group is obviously a linear algebraic group. The stabilizer of in and the kernel of its action on are cut out in by algebraic equations, so that they are linear algebraic groups. The group is a normal subgroup of . Therefore, the group
[TABLE]
is a linear algebraic group as well, see [Bo69, Theorem 6.8]. ∎
Corollary 4.4**.**
Let be a smooth irreducible subvariety of . Suppose that is numerically effective. Then the group is finite.
Proof.
By Lemma 4.3, the group is a linear algebraic group. Therefore, if is infinite, then it contains a subgroup isomorphic either to or to , which implies that is covered by rational curves. On the other hand, since is numerically effective, can’t be covered by rational curves, see [MiMo86, Theorem 1]. ∎
The main tool we use in the proof of Theorem 1.3 is the following result from [Fle81].
Theorem 4.5** (see [Fle81, Satz 8.11(c)]).**
Let be a smooth weighted complete intersection of dimension . Then
[TABLE]
for every integer .
Remark 4.6*.*
Actually, the assertion of [Fle81, Satz 8.11(c)] gives more vanishing results and holds under the weaker assumption that is quasi-smooth. However, we do not want to go into details with the definition of the sheaf here, and in any case we will need smoothness of on the next step.
Theorem 4.5 allows us to prove finiteness of various automorphism groups.
Corollary 4.7**.**
Let be a smooth well formed weighted complete intersection of dimension . Suppose that . The following assertions hold.
- (i)
One has .
- (ii)
The group is finite.
- (iii)
If either or , then the group is finite.
Proof.
By Theorem 4.5 we have
[TABLE]
Recall that by Theorem 2.5. Thus assertion (i) follows from Serre duality. Assertion (ii) follows from assertion (i), because is a linear algebraic group by Lemma 4.3. Similarly, assertion (iii) follows from assertion (i), because the automorphism group of any variety subject to the above assumptions is a linear algebraic group by Corollary 4.2. ∎
Recall that the smooth Fano threefold of Fano index that is defined as an intersection of the Grassmannian in its Plücker embedding with a linear section of codimension has infinite automorphism group , see [Mu88, Proposition 4.4] or [CS15, Proposition 7.1.10]. The next lemma shows that such a situation is impossible for smooth weighted complete intersections.
Lemma 4.8**.**
Let be a smooth well formed weighted complete intersection of dimension . Suppose that . Then the group is finite.
Proof.
If , the assertion follows from Remark 2.7 and the properties of automorphism groups of smooth del Pezzo surfaces, see for instance [Do12, Corollary 8.2.40]. Thus, we assume that and use the classification provided by Proposition 3.7(iv). If is isomorphic to an intersection of two quadrics in or to a cubic hypersurface in , then the assertion follows from Theorem 1.2 (in the latter case one can also use Theorem 1.1).
Now suppose that is isomorphic either to a hypersurface of degree in , or to a hypersurface of degree in . The argument in these cases is similar to that in the proof of [KPS18, Lemma 4.4.1]. Denote by the ample divisor such that . Then there exists an -equivariant double cover , where in the former case and is given by the linear system , while in the latter case and is given by the linear system . Let be the ample Weil divisor generating the group , and let be the branch divisor of . In the former case one has , and in the latter case one has . Note that in the latter case is not Cartier, but is; note also that in this case is branched over the singular point of as well. In both cases is smooth. Furthermore, it follows from adjunction formula that either is ample, or , or is a (smooth well formed) Fano weighted hypersurface of dimension and Fano index .
Since the double cover is -equivariant, we see that the quotient of the group by its normal subgroup of order generated by the Galois involution of is isomorphic to a subgroup of the stabilizer of in . Since is not contained in any divisor linearly equivalent to the very ample divisor , we conclude that acts faithfully on , see for instance [CPS19, Lemma 2.1]. Hence
[TABLE]
On the other hand, the group is finite by Corollary 4.7(ii); alternatively, one can apply Corollaries 4.4 and 4.7(iii). This means that the group is finite as well. ∎
Now we prove our main results.
Proof of Theorem 1.3.
First suppose that . We may assume that is ample. In this case the finiteness of is well-known, see for instance [Ha77, Exercise IV.5.2].
Now suppose that . If , then the group is finite by Corollary 4.7(iii). If , then the group is finite by Lemma 4.8. Finally, if , then we know from Proposition 3.7 that is isomorphic either to or to a quadric hypersurface in . ∎
Corollary 1.4 immediately follows from Theorem 1.3 and Proposition 1.5.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[ACM 18] C. Araujo, M. Corr e ^ ^ e \hat{\mathrm{e}} a, A. Massarenti, Codimension one Fano distributions on Fano manifolds , Commun. Contemp. Math. 20 (2018), no. 5, 1750058.
- 2[Be 13] O. Benoist, Séparation et propriété de Deligne–Mumford des champs de modules d’intersections complètes lisses , J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 87 (2013), no. 1, 138–156.
- 3[Bo 69] A. Borel, Linear algebraic groups , W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York-Amsterdam, 1969.
- 4[CPS 19] I. Cheltsov, V. Przyjalkowski, C. Shramov, Fano threefolds with infinite automorphism groups , Izv. Math. 83:4 (2019), 860–907.
- 5[CS 15] I. Cheltsov, C. Shramov, Cremona groups and the icosahedron , Monographs and Research Notes in Mathematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2016.
- 6[CCC 11] J.-J. Chen, J. Chen, M. Chen, On quasismooth weighted complete intersections , J. Algebraic Geom. 20 (2011), no. 2, 239–262.
- 7[Do 82] I. Dolgachev, Weighted projective varieties , in “Lecture Notes in Math.”, 956, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1982), 34–71.
- 8[Do 12] I. Dolgachev, Classical algebraic geometry. A modern view. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.
