# Control limit on quantum state preparation under decoherence

**Authors:** Kohei Kobayashi, Naoki Yamamoto

arXiv: 1905.12250 · 2019-05-30

## TL;DR

This paper establishes a practical lower bound on the fidelity-based distance between controlled and target quantum states in open systems, aiding in assessing and optimizing quantum state preparation under decoherence.

## Contribution

It introduces a simple, calculable lower bound for state reachability in open quantum systems, applicable to various controls and useful for quantum metrology limits.

## Key findings

- Lower bound is straightforward to compute.
- Guides target state selection in quantum control.
- Derives theoretical limits in quantum metrology.

## Abstract

Quantum information technologies require careful control for generating and preserving a desired target quantum state. The biggest practical obstacle is, of course, decoherence. Therefore, the reachability analysis, which in our scenario aims to estimate the distance between the controlled state under decoherence and the target state, is of great importance to evaluate the realistic performance of those technologies. This paper presents a lower bound of the fidelity-based distance for a general open Markovian quantum system driven by the decoherence process and several types of control including feedback. The lower bound is straightforward to calculate and can be used as a guide for choosing the target state, as demonstrated in some examples. Moreover, the lower bound is applied to derive a theoretical limit in some quantum metrology problems based on a large-size atomic ensemble under control and decoherence.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.12250/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.12250/full.md

## References

51 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.12250/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.12250