# Low-redshift measurement of the sound horizon through gravitational   time-delays

**Authors:** Nikki Arendse, Adriano Agnello, Rados{\l}aw Wojtak

arXiv: 1905.12000 · 2020-02-20

## TL;DR

This paper presents a low-redshift, model-independent measurement of the cosmic sound horizon using gravitational time-delays, supernovae, and BAO, providing a robust test of the Standard Model independent of CMB data.

## Contribution

It introduces a novel, cosmology-independent method to measure the sound horizon using gravitational time-delays and other low-redshift indicators, avoiding reliance on CMB inference.

## Key findings

- Measured sound horizon $r_s$ between 133 and 138 Mpc.
- Results are consistent across different models and robust against systematics.
- Provides a competitive, independent test of the Standard Model.

## Abstract

The matter sound horizon can be inferred from the cosmic microwave background within the Standard Model. Independent direct measurements of the sound horizon are then a probe of possible deviations from the Standard Model. We aim at measuring the sound horizon $r_s$ from low-redshift indicators, which are completely independent of CMB inference. We used the measured product $H(z)r_s$ from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) together with supernovae~\textsc{I}a to constrain $H(z)/H_{0}$ and time-delay lenses analysed by the H0LiCOW collaboration to anchor cosmological distances ($\propto H_{0}^{-1}$). {Additionally, we investigated the influence of adding a sample of quasars with higher redshift with standardisable UV-Xray luminosity distances. We adopted polynomial expansions in $H(z)$ or in comoving distances} so that our inference was completely independent of any cosmological model on which the expansion history might be based. Our measurements are independent of Cepheids and systematics from peculiar motions {to within percent-level accuracy.} The inferred sound horizon $r_s$ varies between $(133 \pm 8)$~Mpc and $(138 \pm 5)$~Mpc across different models. The discrepancy with CMB measurements is robust against model choice. Statistical uncertainties are comparable to systematics. The combination of time-delay lenses, supernovae, and BAO yields a distance ladder that is independent of cosmology (and of Cepheid calibration) and a measurement of $r_s $ that is independent of the CMB. These cosmographic measurements are then a competitive test of the Standard Model, regardless of the hypotheses on which the cosmology is based.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.12000/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.12000/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.12000/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.12000