Magnification Cross Sections for the Elliptic Umbilic Caustic Surface

TL;DR

This paper analyzes how the magnification volume cross section scales asymptotically near elliptic umbilic caustic surfaces, revealing specific power-law behaviors in different image regions.

Contribution

It provides the first detailed asymptotic scaling laws for the magnification cross section near elliptic umbilic caustics.

Findings

Magnification cross section scales as μ^{-2.5} in two-image regions.

Magnification cross section scales as μ^{-2} in four-image regions.

Results clarify the behavior of gravitational lensing near elliptic umbilic caustics.

Abstract

We show that the asymptotic scaling of the magnification volume cross section corresponding to an elliptic umbilic caustic surface is $\mu^{-2.5}$ in the two-image region and $\mu^{-2}$ in the four-image region, where $\mu$ is the total unsigned magnification.

Equations

$$\eta (x,y)=(x^2-y^2,-2xy+4cy)=(s_1,s_2),$$

$$\tilde{\mu }(x,y)=\frac{1}{\det (\mathrm{Jac}\eta )(x,y)}=\frac{1}{8cx-4(x^2+y^2)}\cdot$$

$$V(\mu )={\int }_{c_1}^{c_2}A(\mu ,c)dc,$$

$$\displaystyle 2\pi c^{4}-\Big{(}2\pi c^{4}-\frac{\pi}{8\tilde{\mu}^{2}}\Big{)}=\frac{\pi}{8\tilde{\mu}^{2}}\cdot$$

$$\sum _{i=1}^4{\tilde{\mu }}_i=0,$$

Full text

I Introduction

Magnification cross sections are an important tool in gravitational lensing. Knowing the magnification cross section allows one to determine the probability that a light source will have magnification greater than some fixed value. This in turn gives information about the accuracy of cosmological models, since these predict different probabilities regarding source magnifications (see Schneider et al. 1992 Sch-EF , Kaiser 1992 Kaiser , Bartelmann et al. 1998 Bart , and Petters et al. 2001 (Petters, , Chapter 13)). Knowing magnification cross sections is also important for observational programs that use lensing magnification to help detect extremely faint galaxies (see, e.g., Lotz et al. 2017 Lotz , and references therein).

It is well known that for the so-called “fold” and “cusp” caustic singularities, the area cross sections scale asymptotically as $\mathfrak{\mu}^{-2}$ and $\mathfrak{\mu}^{-2.5}$, respectively, where $\mathfrak{\mu}$ is the total unsigned magnification of a lensed source (for the cusp caustic, it is assumed that the source lies in the one-image region locally). In the case of single-plane lensing, the fold scaling was determined by Blandford and Narayan 1986 Blan-Nar , while the cusp scaling was determined by Mao 1992 Mao and Schneider and Weiss 1992 Sch-Weiss92 . For multiple-plane lensing, the fold and cusp scalings were determined by Petters et al. (Petters, , Chapter 13).

In this paper we commence the study of magnification cross sections of “higher-order” caustic surfaces; in particular, we derive the (single-plane) asymptotic limit of the magnification cross section for the “elliptic umbilic” caustic surface, which is not a curve but rather a two-dimensional stable caustic surface in a three-dimensional parameter space (for precise definitions, consult, e.g., Arnold 1973 Arnold73 , Callahan 1974 & 1977 Callahan ; Callahan2 , Majthay 1985 Majthay , Arnold et al. 1985 AGV1 , Petters 1993 Petters93 , Sch-EF ; Petters ); its magnification “cross section” is therefore a region with volume. As hypothesized in Rusin et al. 2001 Rusin and Blandford 2001 Blandford2001 , the elliptic umbilic is likely to be manifested inside a triangle formed by three lensing galaxies, and to involve one positive-parity and three negative-parity images. As shown in Shin and Evans 2008 Shin-Evans and de Xivry and Marshall 2009 O-Marshall , elliptic umbilics can also appear in lensing by binary galaxies, if the binary separation is small enough. The asymptotic scaling of the elliptic umbilic volume cross section will depend on whether the source gives rise to two or four lensed images locally. We show that, in the two-image region, this volume cross section scales to leading order as $\mathfrak{\mu}^{-2.5}$, whereas in the four-image region, its leading order scales as $\mathfrak{\mu}^{-2}$. In both cases, our results are supported numerically and analytically. In our derivation of $\mathfrak{\mu}^{-2}$ in the four-image region, we make use of a certain magnification relation that holds for higher-order caustic singularities, and the elliptic umbilic in particular, that was shown to hold in Aazami and Petters 2009 AP .

II The elliptic umbilic caustic surface

Let $(x,y)$ denote coordinates on the lens plane and $(s_{1},s_{2})$ those on the source plane. Like all higher-order caustic surfaces, the elliptic umbilic caustic has parameters in addition to the two source plane coordinates. (Such higher-order parameters can, depending on the setting, be used to model the source redshift, radii of galaxies, ellipticities, distance along the line of sight, etc., of the lens system in question; see, e.g., (Sch-EF, , Chapter 8)). A gravitational lensing map in the neighborhood of an elliptic umbilic critical point, as derived in (Sch-EF, , Chapter 5), takes the form

[TABLE]

where $c\in\mathbb{R}$ is a parameter in addition to the source plane coordinates $s_{1},s_{2}$; i.e., the elliptic umbilic caustic is a surface in the parameter space $\{(s_{1},s_{2},c)\}=\mathbb{R}^{3}$, not a curve in the source plane $S:=\{(s_{1},s_{2})\}=\mathbb{R}^{2}$. Accordingly, the “magnification cross section” is a (three-dimensional) volume, and the asymptotic scaling is the leading order term in the limit as the magnification goes to infinity. Figure 1 shows the elliptic umbilic caustic surface, while Figure 2 shows a $c$-slice of it on the source plane $S$.

If a source located at $(s_{1},s_{2})$ on the source plane has a lensed image located at $(x,y)$ on the lens plane, then the magnification $\tilde{\mu}$ of this lensed image is given by

[TABLE]

Now fix $c\in\mathbb{R}$ and $\mu>0$. Consider first the four-image region enclosed by the caustic curve in Figure 2. Let $C_{\mu}$ denote the subset consisting of those source positions $(s_{1},s_{2})$ in the four-image region with total unsigned magnification equal to $\mu$, where the unsigned magnification of each image $(x_{i},y_{i})$ belonging to $(s_{1},s_{2})$ is given by $|\tilde{\mu}(x_{i},y_{i})|$ in (2). $C_{\mu}$ will consist of the closed dashed curve inside the caustic curve in Figure 2; any source inside the dashed region will have total unsigned magnification less than $\mu$, while a source in the region $D$ will have total unsigned magnification equal to $\mu$. Likewise for the two-image region, which is the (unbounded) region outside the caustic curve: for $\mu$ large enough, the enclosed regions $A$, $B$, and $C$ comprise those sources whose two lensed images will have total unsigned magnification greater than $\mu$. (By symmetry, $A$, $B$, and $C$ all have the same areas.)

Whether in the two- or the four-image region, the asymptotic scaling there is determined as follows. The areas labeled $A$, $B$, $C$, and $D$ will in general be functions of $\mu$ and $c$; denote any one of these, e.g., by $A(\mu,c)$. To obtain a volume section, denoted $V(\mu)$, we integrate

[TABLE]

where $c_{1}<c_{2}$ are arbitrary but of the same sign. Finally, we take the limit $\lim_{\mu\to\infty}V(\mu)$ and identify the leading order term; this is the asymptotic scaling of the elliptic umbilic magnification volume.

We first examine the scalings numerically. For a given $c$-slice, we compute the total magnification on a grid in plane $S$, as shown in Figure 3. The grid is adaptive, meaning that more grid points are used in regions where the magnification changes quickly and high resolution is needed to obtain accurate results. We use the grid to approximate the area integral and compute $A(\mu,c)$. We then combine different $c$-slices to approximate the integral in (3) and obtain $V(\mu)$. Figure 4 shows examples of $A(\mu,c)$ and $V(\mu)$ for the two-image region, while Figure 5 shows $A(\mu,c)$ for the four-image region.

We support our numerical findings with the following analytical arguments. For the four-image region, there is in fact a succinct argument that confirms the numerical result $\mu^{-2}$, as follows. For any source in the four-image region (and assuming $c\neq 0$), the lensing map (1) has three lensed images with negative magnification and one lensed image with positive magnification, where the magnification of a lensed image is given by (2). Fix $\tilde{\mu}>0$ and let $S_{\tilde{\mu}}$ denote the set of sources in the four-image region whose one positive-magnification image has magnification $\tilde{\mu}$; as usual, let $\mu$ denote the total unsigned magnification of this source. In fact $S_{\tilde{\mu}}$ comprises the closed dashed curve inside the caustic that we saw in Figure 2. It is straightforward to compute that the area labeled $D$ — that is, the area outside $S_{\tilde{\mu}}$ but inside the caustic — is equal to

[TABLE]

Observe that this area is $c$-independent. This area is related to $A(\mu,c)$, the magnification (area) cross section, as follows. Let $\vec{s}$ be a source in the four-image region whose total unsigned magnification is $\mu$. Clearly $\vec{s}\notin S_{\mu}$, since its one positive-magnification image must be less than $\mu$. However, it is known that the four-image region of the elliptic umbilic, for any $c\neq 0$, satisfies the following magnification relation,

[TABLE]

with $\tilde{\mu}_{i}$ is the signed magnification of lensed image $i$; see AP for a proof. (For clarity, we use the notation “$\tilde{\mu}$” to denote the magnification belonging to an individual image, and reserve the notation “$\mu$” to denote the total unsigned magnification of a source.) It follows that $\vec{s}\in S_{\mu/2}$, because the positive-magnification image must have magnification $\mu/2$, since the other three magnifications are negative and must cancel it out. Thus the closed curve $S_{\mu/2}$ is precisely the level curve of sources with total unsigned magnification $\mu$. Observe that when $\tilde{\mu}=\mu/2$ in (4), then $A(\mu,c)=\pi/(2\mu^{2})$, as in Figure 5. And thus the area cross section scales like (4). Figure 5 confirms this result numerically. Integrating (4) from $c_{1}$ to $c_{2}$ yields a volume cross section that clearly scales as $V(\mu)\propto\mu^{-2}$.

There remains, finally, the two-image region outside the caustic curve shown in Figure 2. Here, for $\mu>0$ large enough, those sources with total unsigned magnification greater than $\mu$ comprise the regions labeled $A$, $B$, and $C$, which three enclosed areas are equal by symmetry. In this case the area enclosed by them is not as easily derivable analytically, due to the complicated nature of the intersection points of the dashed curves with the caustic. However, it is possible to bound the areas $A$, $B$, and $C$, from above and below, and to show that these lower and upper bounds, which are functions of $\mu$ and $c$, both scale to leading order in $\mu$ as $\sim\!\mu^{-2.5}$, thereby supporting our numerical results in Figure 4. Figure 6 briefly describes the procedure, foregoing technical details.

CONCLUSION

We have shown that the asymptotic scaling of the magnification volume cross section corresponding to an elliptic umbilic caustic surface is $\mathfrak{\mu}^{-2.5}$ in the two-image region and $\mathfrak{\mu}^{-2}$ in the four-image region, where $\mathfrak{\mu}$ is the total unsigned magnification. In both cases our results are supported both numerically and analytically. The goal was to extend to higher-order caustic singularities the well known (area) cross sections for fold ($\mu^{-2}$) and cusp ($\mu^{-2.5}$) caustics, in particular given that the elliptic umbilic caustic can be manifested in both binary and three-galaxy lensing systems.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Some of this work was done at the American Mathematical Society’s June, 2018, Mathematics Research Conference on the “Mathematics of Gravity and Light.” This material is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1641020.