On Free Polyadic Groups
Gholamhosein Fathtabar, Hamid Khodabandeh, Kosar Yousefi

TL;DR
This paper characterizes when a polyadic group derived from a group G, automorphism G, and element b is free, providing a necessary and sufficient condition based on these components.
Contribution
It introduces a precise criterion for the freeness of polyadic groups constructed from given groups, automorphisms, and elements.
Findings
Provides a necessary and sufficient condition for freeness
Links group properties with polyadic group structure
Advances understanding of free polyadic groups
Abstract
In this article, for a polyadic group(G,f),derived from group G by automorphism G and element b, we give a necessary and sufficient condition in terms of the group, the automorphism G, and the element b, in order that the polyadic group becomes free.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
On free polyadic groups
H. Khodabandeh
H. Khodabandeh
and
K.Yousefi
K. Yousefi
Abstract.
In this article, for a polyadic group , we give a necessary and sufficient condition in terms of the group , the automorphism , and the element , in order that the polyadic group becomes free.
MSC(2010): Primary 20N15, Secondary 08A99 and 14A99
Keywords: Polyadic groups; -ary groups; Post’s cover; Free polyadic groups; Free group
1. Introduction
In this article, we continue our study of the structure of free polyadic groups and we will answer a question of M. Shahryari. A polyadic group is a natural generalization of the concept of group to the case where the binary operation of group replaced with an -ary associative operation, one variable linear equations in which have unique solutions (see the next section for the detailed definitions). These interesting algebraic objects are introduced by Kasner and Dörnte ([14] and [3]) and studied extensively by Emil Post during the first decades of the last century, [18]. During decades, many articles are published on the structure of polyadic groups. Already homomorphisms and automorphisms of polyadic groups are studied in [15]. A characterization of the simple polyadic groups is obtained by them in [16]. Also representation theory of polyadic groups is studied in [9]. The complex characters of finite polyadic groups are also investigated by the M. Shahryari in [19].
It is known that for every polyadic (-ary) group , there exists a corresponding ordinary group , an automorphism of this ordinary group, and an element , the structure of in which complectly determined by , , and . M. Shahryari, asked us to find a necessary and sufficient condition for a polyadic group to be free in terms of the group , the automorphism , and the element . Our aim is to give an answer to this question.
2. Polyadic groups
This section contains basic notions and properties of polyadic groups as well as some literature. Let be a non-empty set and be a positive integer. If is an -ary operation, then we use the compact notation for the elements . In general, if is an arbitrary sequence of elements in , then we denote it as . In the special case, when all terms of this sequence are equal to a constant , we denote it by , where is the number of terms. We say that an -ary operation is associative, if for any , the equality
[TABLE]
holds for all . An -ary system is called an -ary group or a polyadic group, if is associative and for all and , there exists a unique element such that
[TABLE]
It is proved that the uniqueness assumption on the solution can be dropped [5]. Clearly, the case is just the definition of ordinary groups. During this article, we assume that . The classical paper of E. Post [18], is one of the first articles published on the subject. In this paper, Post proves his well-known coset theorem. Many basic properties of polyadic groups are studied in this paper. The articles [3] and [14] are among the first materials written on the polyadic groups. Russian reader, can use the book of Galmak [10], for an almost complete description of polyadic groups. The articles [2], [4], [11], and [12] can be used for study of axioms of polyadic groups as well as their varieties.
Note that an -ary system of the form , where is a group and a fixed element belonging to the center of , is an -ary group. Such an -ary group is called -derived from the group and it is denoted by . In the case when is the identity of , we say that such a polyadic group is reduced to the group or derived from and we use the notation for it. For every , there are -ary groups which are not derived from any group. An -ary group is derived from some group if and only if it contains an element (called an -ary identity) such that
[TABLE]
holds for all and for all , see [5].
From the definition of an -ary group , we can directly see that for every , there exists only one , satisfying the equation
[TABLE]
This element is called skew to and it is denoted by . As Dörnte [3] proved, the following identities hold for all , ,
[TABLE]
These identities together with the associativity identities, axiomatize the variety of polyadic groups in the algebraic language .
Suppose is a polyadic group and is a fixed element. Define a binary operation
[TABLE]
Then is an ordinary group, called the retract of over . Such a retract will be denoted by . All retracts of a polyadic group are isomorphic [8]. The identity of the group is . One can verify that the inverse element to has the form
[TABLE]
One of the most fundamental theorems of polyadic group is the following, now known as Hosszú -Gloskin’s Theorem. We will use it frequently in this article and the reader can use [6], [7], [13] and [20] for detailed discussions.
Theorem 2.1**.**
Let be an -ary group. Then there exists an ordinary group , an automorphism of and an element such that
1. ,
2. , for every ,
3. , for all .
According to this theorem, we use the notation for and we say that is -derived from the group . During this paper, we will assume that .
Varieties of polyadic groups and the structure of congruences on polyadic groups are studied in [2] and [4]. It is proved that all congruences on polyadic groups are commute and so the lattice of congruences is modular.
There is one more important object associated to polyadic groups. Let be a polyadic group. Then, as Post proved, there exists a unique group (which we call now the Post’s cover of ) such that
*1- is contained in as a coset of a normal subgroup .
*2- is isomorphic to a retract of .
*3- We have .
*4- Inside , for all , we have .
*5- is generated by .
The group is also universal in the class of all groups having properties 1, 4. More precisely, if is a polyadic homomorphism, then there exists a unique ordinary homomorphism such that . This universal property characterizes uniquely. The explicit construction of the Post’s cover can be find in [19].
3. Free polyadic groups
The structure of free polyadic groups, their construction, and their Post’s cover are studied in [17]. Let be a polyadic group. It is natural to ask when this polyadic group is free. Our main theorem gives a complete solution for this problem. We will need the following well-known theorem of Nielsen-Schrier on the bases of free groups. Note that if is the free group on a set , is any subgroup, and is a right transversal for , then by the notation we denote the unique element of satisfying . The proof of the following theorem can be find in any standard book of presentation theory of groups.
Theorem 3.1**.**
Let be the free group of rank , be a subgroup of index and be a right transversal of . Then the rank of is equal to and the set
[TABLE]
is a basis of .
We can now prove our main theorem.
Theorem 3.2**.**
*Let be a polyadic group. The necessary and sufficient condition for to be free of rank is that
1- the group is a free of rank and
[TABLE]
2- there exists a subset , such that the set
[TABLE]
is a basis of .
Proof.
First, assume that is free of rank and let
[TABLE]
be a basis. By [17], we have
[TABLE]
where is the homomorphism .
Suppose that . Then we have
[TABLE]
By [1], we know that is the Post’s cover of and since the index of in is , so is free of rank and by the coset theorem of Post we have . So, is also a free group of rank and this proves 1. Now, consider the right transversal . By the above theorem, the set
[TABLE]
is a basis of . Note that if , then
[TABLE]
and hence for , we have and for , we have . If , then
[TABLE]
and since , so we have . This means that . Consequently
[TABLE]
Now, recall that . By [16] and its notations, the identity of is and we have , for all . Also, we have
[TABLE]
So, using the relations of Sokolov, we have
[TABLE]
Again, if we use the notations of [16], we have
[TABLE]
and the map , defined by , is an isomorphism. Hence, the set
[TABLE]
is a basis of . Using Nielsen transformations, the next set is also a basis:
[TABLE]
But, since
[TABLE]
so we have
[TABLE]
This proves the assertion 2.
Now, assume that 1 and 2 are true and we prove that
[TABLE]
is free. By 2, suppose and , where is the identity of . Consider the group . Inside this group, we have
[TABLE]
We know that . So, is a free group. Define a homomorphism by
[TABLE]
Put . For any , we have
[TABLE]
and hence for any , we have
[TABLE]
This shows that for all ,
[TABLE]
Note that and , and hence . On the other side, has a normal subgroup , with , and such that . Since , so and this shows that is the Post’s cover of . Now, since , by [1], is free.
∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Artamonov V., Free n 𝑛 n -groups , Matematicheskie Zametki, 1970, 8 , pp. 499-507.
- 2[2] Artamonov V., On Schreier varieties of n 𝑛 n -groups and n 𝑛 n -semigroups , Trudy Semin. im. I. G. Petrovskogo, 1979, 5 , pp. 193-203.
- 3[3] Dörnte W., Unterschungen über einen verallgemeinerten Gruppenbegriff , Math. Z., 1929, 29 , pp. 1-19.
- 4[4] Dudek W., Varieties of polyadic groups , Filomat, 1995, 9 , pp. 657-674.
- 5[5] Dudek W., Remarks on n 𝑛 n -groups , Demonstratio Math., 1980, 13 , pp. 65-181.
- 6[6] Dudek W., Glazek K., Around the Hosszú-Gluskin Theorem for n 𝑛 n -ary groups , Discrete Math., 2008, 308 , pp. 4861-4876.
- 7[7] Dudek W., Michalski J., On a generalization of Hosszú theorem , Demonstratio Math., 1982, 15 , pp. 437-441.
- 8[8] Dudek W. , Michalski J., On retract of polyadic groups , Demonstratio Math., 1984, 17 , pp. 281-301.
