# Inverse Blaschke-Santal\'o inequality for convex curves enclosing the   origin several times

**Authors:** K. J. B\"or\"oczky, E. Makai Jr

arXiv: 1905.11766 · 2019-05-29

## TL;DR

This paper investigates a conjecture on the minimal volume product of convex curves enclosing the origin multiple times, providing proofs for specific cases and bounds for others, advancing understanding of geometric inequalities.

## Contribution

The paper proves the conjecture for certain convex polygons with equal central angles and establishes bounds for other cases, extending previous results on volume product inequalities.

## Key findings

- Proved the conjecture for convex n-gons with 2k+1 ≤ n ≤ 4k and equal central angles.
- Established that for n ≥ 4k+1, stationary volume product values occur when vertices lie on the unit circle with equal angles.
- Provided a bound of approximately 0.43 for the conjecture in inscribed polygons with 2k+1 ≤ n.

## Abstract

H. Guggenheimer generalized the planar volume product problem for locally convex curves $C$ enclosing the origin $k \ge 2$ times. He conjectured that the minimal volume product $V(C)V(C^*)$ for these curves is attained if the curve consists of the longest diagonals of a regular $(2k+1)$-gon, with centre $0$, these diagonals taken always in the positive orientation. This conjectured minimum is of the form $k^2 + O(k)$. We investigate special cases of this conjecture. We prove it for locally convex $n$-gons with $2k+1 \le n \le 4k$, if the central angles at $0$ of all sides are equal to $2k \pi /n$. For $4k+1 \le n$ we prove that for locally convex $n$-gons enclosing the origin $k \ge 2$ times the critical (stationary) values of the volume product $V(K)V(K^*)$ are attained exactly when up to a non-singular linear map the vertices lie on the unit circle about $0$, and the central angles of all sides are equal to $2k \pi /n$. For locally convex $n$-gons enclosing the origin $k \ge 2$ times, and inscribed to the unit circle, with $2k+1 \le n$, we prove the conjecture up to a multiplicative factor about $0.43$.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.11766/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.11766