Spatial realization of a Lie algebra and Bar construction of a group
Yves F\'elix, Daniel Tanr\'e

TL;DR
This paper establishes an isomorphism between the spatial realization of a rational Lie algebra and the simplicial bar construction of a group, linking algebraic and topological structures through the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff product.
Contribution
It demonstrates a novel isomorphism connecting the spatial realization of a Lie algebra with the bar construction of a group, advancing the understanding of their algebraic-topological relationship.
Findings
Spatial realization of a Lie algebra is isomorphic to the bar construction of a group.
The isomorphism is established via the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff product.
The work bridges Lie algebra structures with simplicial group constructions.
Abstract
We prove that the spatial realization of a rational complete Lie algebra , concentrated in degree 0, is isomorphic to the simplicial bar construction on the group, obtained from the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff product on .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Spatial realization of a Lie algebra and the Bar construction
Yves Félix
Institut de Mathématiques et Physique
Université Catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve
Louvain-la-Neuve
Belgique
and
Daniel Tanré
Département de Mathématiques
UMR 8524
Université de Lille
59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex
France
Abstract.
We prove that the spatial realization of a rational complete Lie algebra , concentrated in degree 0, is isomorphic to the simplicial bar construction on the group, obtained from the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff product on .
Key words and phrases:
Rational homotopy theory. Realization of Lie algebras. Lie models of simplicial sets. Model category.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary: 55P62, 17B55; Secondary: 55U10
The authors are partially supported by the MINECO-FEDER grant MTM2016-78647-P. The second author is partially supported by the ANR-11-LABX-0007-01 “CEMPI”
Introduction
In [4], we construct a cosimplicial differential graded complete Lie algebra (henceforth ) , in which is the Lawrence-Sullivan model of the interval introduced in [7]. As in the work of Sullivan ([9]) for differential commutative graded algebras, the existence of this cosimplicial object gives an adjoint pair of functors between the category of cdgl’s and the category of simplicial sets, see [4] or [2]. In this work, we focus on one of them, the spatial realization functor,
[TABLE]
defined by for . (Let us also notice that is isomorphic to the nerve of , a deformation retract of the Getzler-Hinich realization, see [1], [8].)
More precisely, we are interested in the realization of a complete Lie algebra, , concentrated in degree 0 and (thus) with the differential 0. In this case, a group structure can be defined on the set from the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula. We denote by this group. The realization is an Eilenberg-MacLane space of type , see [5]. The purpose of this work is the determination of up to isomorphism.
Main Theorem **.**
Let be a complete differential graded Lie algebra, concentrated in degree 0. Then, its spatial realization is isomorphic to the simplicial bar construction on .
Let us emphasize that for an Eilenberg-Maclane space , of associated Lie algebra , then the realizations of the of Sullivan ([9]) and of Getzler ([6]) are weakly equivalent to the simplicial bar resolution. In our setting, the simplicial set is isomorphic to the simplicial bar resolution. With [2], we know that spaces more general than a admits a cdgl model . For them, the simplicial set appears as a natural extension of the bar construction. We will come back on this point in a forthcoming work.
In Section 1, we recall basic background on and our construction . Section 2 consists of the proof of the Main theorem.
1. Some reminders
We first recall the construction of the cosimplicial . Let be a finite dimensional graded vector space. The completion of the free graded Lie algebra on , , is the inverse limit,
[TABLE]
where is the ideal generated by the Lie brackets of length . We call the free complete graded Lie algebra on .
As a graded Lie algebra, is the free complete graded Lie algebra on the rational vector space generated by the elements of degree , with . We denote by the Lie derivation . The satisfies the following properties.
– is the free on a Maurer-Cartan element , that is:
[TABLE]
– is the Lawrence-Sullivan interval (see [7]), where and are Maurer-Cartan elements and
[TABLE]
– A model for the triangle has been described in [4] (see also [3]):
[TABLE]
Here denotes the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff product defined for any pair of elements , of degree 0 by .
– Moreover these structures appear in each : each vertex is a Maurer-Cartan element, each triple is a Lawrence-Sullivan interval and each family is a triangle as above.
The family forms a cosimplicial which allows the definition of the spatial realization of by,
[TABLE]
The cofaces and the codegeneracies of the cosimplicial are defined by
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
2. Proof of the main theorem
The simplicial bar construction on a group , is the simplicial set with set of -simplices . Its elements are denoted , with . The faces and degeneracies of are defined as follows:
[TABLE]
The degeneracy inserts the identity of in position .
Let be generated in degree 0 and a morphism in . For degree reasons, we have if . Moreover, since commutes the differential, from the definition of the differential in , we get
[TABLE]
Therefore, for any , we have
[TABLE]
The map being entirely defined by its values on the , we have a bijection
[TABLE]
We now determine the image of the faces and degeneracies on , induced from (1.1) and (1.6). For the face operators, as only the elements play a role, it suffices to consider,
[TABLE]
Let be specified by . Then is described by
[TABLE]
Therefore, the face operator on , induced from , is
[TABLE]
Similar arguments give, for ,
[TABLE]
As for the degeneracies, starting from
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
we get
[TABLE]
and for ,
[TABLE]
Now a straightforward and easy computation shows that the morphism
[TABLE]
defined by
[TABLE]
is an isomorphism of simplicial sets.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Urtzi Buijs, Yves Félix, Aniceto Murillo, and Daniel Tanré, The infinity Quillen functor, Maurer-Cartan elements and DGL realizations , ar Xiv e-prints (2017), ar Xiv:1702.04397.
- 2[2] by same author, Homotopy theory of complete Lie algebras and Lie models of simplicial sets , J. Topol. 11 (2018), no. 3, 799–825. MR 3989431
- 3[3] by same author, Symmetric Lie models of a triangle , Fund. Math. 246 (2019), no. 3, 289–300. MR 3959254
- 4[4] by same author, Lie models of simplicial sets and representability of the Quillen functor , Israel J. Math. 238 (2020), no. 1, 313–358. MR 4145802
- 5[5] Xue Zhi Cheng and Ezra Getzler, Transferring homotopy commutative algebraic structures , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 212 (2008), no. 11, 2535–2542. MR 2440265
- 6[6] Ezra Getzler, Lie theory for nilpotent L ∞ subscript 𝐿 L_{\infty} -algebras , Ann. of Math. (2) 170 (2009), no. 1, 271–301. MR 2521116
- 7[7] Ruth Lawrence and Dennis Sullivan, A formula for topology/deformations and its significance , Fund. Math. 225 (2014), no. 1, 229–242. MR 3205571
- 8[8] Daniel Robert-Nicoud, Representing the deformation ∞ \infty –groupoid , Algebr. Geom. Topol. 19 (2019), no. 3, 1453–1476. MR 3954288
