Branching ratios in the $\beta$ decay of $^{16}$N
O. S. Kirsebom, E. R. Christensen (for the IS605 Collaboration)

TL;DR
This paper reports high-precision measurements of the branching ratios in the beta decay of nitrogen-16, providing valuable data for nuclear physics research.
Contribution
The study presents new, precise experimental measurements of the branching ratios in $^{16}$N beta decay, improving upon previous data.
Findings
Determined several branching ratios with high precision.
Enhanced accuracy over previous measurements.
Contributes to better understanding of nuclear decay processes.
Abstract
In this brief note, we present the results of an experiment performed at the ISOLDE Decay Station at CERN in which several of the branching ratios in the decay of N were determined with high precision and accuracy.
| Transition | (%) |
|---|---|
| Level | (%) |
|---|---|
| 8.87 | |
| 7.12 | |
| 6.92 | |
| 6.13 |
| Level | (%) |
|---|---|
| 0 | |
| 6.05 | |
| 6.13 | |
| 6.92 | |
| 7.12 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Nuclear physics research studies · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Branching ratios in the decay of 16N
O. S. Kirsebom
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Denmark
Institute for Big Data Analytics, Dalhousie University, Canada
E. R. Christensen
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Denmark
the IS605 Collaboration
Abstract
In this brief note, we present the results of an experiment performed at the ISOLDE Decay Station at CERN in which several of the branching ratios in the decay of 16N were determined with high precision and accuracy.
The -ray spectrum of 16N was measured at ISOLDE using an array of HPGe detectors, as previously reported in Ref. Kirsebom et al. (2018). The -ray peaks were well resolved, allowing the number of counts in each peak to be determined with high precision. Yields of individual -ray transitions were determined by dividing the number of counts with the energy-dependent detection efficiency of the array. Yields were further corrected for summation of rays emitted in cascade transitions, taking into account the known angular correlations Vermeer and Poletti (1982). Summation was found to be significant only for the 8.87-MeV peak, where it accounts for 90% of the observed yield.
The -ray yields obtained in the present study are given in Table 1. For unobserved transitions we report upper limits at 95% C.L. The -decay branching ratios are given in Table 2. Finally, the branching ratios for the de-excitation of the 8.87-MeV level are given in Table 3. The present results generally have better precision than existing literature values Tilley et al. (1993). Where previous data exist, the agreement with the present data is good or fair with one notable exception: The present value for the branching ratio of the transition (Table 3) is a factor of smaller than the value reported in Ref. Wilkinson et al. (1968). The likely explanation for this discrepancy is that the authors of Ref. Wilkinson et al. (1968) failed to account for the summation of rays emitted in cascade transitions, thereby incorrectly attributing the entire yield of the 8.87-MeV peak to the transition. Given the information provided in Ref. Wilkinson et al. (1968) it is possible to obtain a rough estimate of the summation yield, which in fact is comparable to the observed yield.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Kirsebom et al. (2018) O. S. Kirsebom et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 , 142701 (2018) . · doi ↗
- 2Vermeer and Poletti (1982) W. J. Vermeer and A. R. Poletti, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear Physics 8 , 743 (1982) . · doi ↗
- 3Tilley et al. (1993) D. Tilley, H. Weller, and C. Cheves, Nuclear Physics A 564 , 1 (1993) . · doi ↗
- 4Wilkinson et al. (1968) D. H. Wilkinson, D. E. Alburger, and J. Lowe, Phys. Rev. 173 , 995 (1968) . · doi ↗
