# Underwater Fish Detection with Weak Multi-Domain Supervision

**Authors:** Dmitry A. Konovalov, Alzayat Saleh, Michael Bradley, Mangalam, Sankupellay, Simone Marini, Marcus Sheaves

arXiv: 1905.10708 · 2019-11-05

## TL;DR

This paper presents a data-efficient CNN training method for underwater fish detection using limited project-specific images combined with diverse general-domain datasets, achieving high accuracy and low error rates.

## Contribution

It introduces a multi-domain supervised training approach that reduces labeling effort while maintaining high detection accuracy for underwater fish classification.

## Key findings

- Achieved 0.17% false positives and 0.61% false negatives.
- Attained 99.94% AUC on holdout test images.
- Utilized a small, diverse dataset to train an effective fish detector.

## Abstract

Given a sufficiently large training dataset, it is relatively easy to train a modern convolution neural network (CNN) as a required image classifier. However, for the task of fish classification and/or fish detection, if a CNN was trained to detect or classify particular fish species in particular background habitats, the same CNN exhibits much lower accuracy when applied to new/unseen fish species and/or fish habitats. Therefore, in practice, the CNN needs to be continuously fine-tuned to improve its classification accuracy to handle new project-specific fish species or habitats. In this work we present a labelling-efficient method of training a CNN-based fish-detector (the Xception CNN was used as the base) on relatively small numbers (4,000) of project-domain underwater fish/no-fish images from 20 different habitats. Additionally, 17,000 of known negative (that is, missing fish) general-domain (VOC2012) above-water images were used. Two publicly available fish-domain datasets supplied additional 27,000 of above-water and underwater positive/fish images. By using this multi-domain collection of images, the trained Xception-based binary (fish/not-fish) classifier achieved 0.17% false-positives and 0.61% false-negatives on the project's 20,000 negative and 16,000 positive holdout test images, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 99.94%.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.10708/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.10708/full.md

## References

46 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.10708/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.10708