Equitable Allocations of Indivisible Goods
Rupert Freeman, Sujoy Sikdar, Rohit Vaish, Lirong Xia

TL;DR
This paper explores fair division of indivisible goods, demonstrating algorithms that achieve equitability, Pareto optimality, and their combinations, supported by experiments on real data.
Contribution
It introduces a novel algorithm guaranteeing Pareto optimality and equitability up to one good, advancing fair division methods for indivisible items.
Findings
Leximin algorithm satisfies equitability up to any good and Pareto optimality.
New algorithm guarantees Pareto optimality and equitability up to one good in pseudopolynomial time.
Experiments show multiple fairness and efficiency criteria can be achieved simultaneously.
Abstract
In fair division, equitability dictates that each participant receives the same level of utility. In this work, we study equitable allocations of indivisible goods among agents with additive valuations. While prior work has studied (approximate) equitability in isolation, we consider equitability in conjunction with other well-studied notions of fairness and economic efficiency. We show that the Leximin algorithm produces an allocation that satisfies equitability up to any good and Pareto optimality. We also give a novel algorithm that guarantees Pareto optimality and equitability up to one good in pseudopolynomial time. Our experiments on real-world preference data reveal that approximate envy-freeness, approximate equitability, and Pareto optimality can often be achieved simultaneously.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Auction Theory and Applications
