A 3+1 Decomposition of the Minimal Standard-Model Extension Gravitational Sector
Nils A. Nilsson, Kellie O'Neal-Ault, Quentin G. Bailey

TL;DR
This paper develops a 3+1 decomposition of the minimal Standard-Model Extension gravity Lagrangian, facilitating comparisons with other gravity models and aiding in canonical quantum gravity and numerical relativity.
Contribution
It introduces a novel 3+1 (ADM) decomposition of the SME gravity Lagrangian aligned with a timelike vector field, enabling better integration with existing gravity frameworks.
Findings
Decomposition aligns SME gravity with ADM formalism
Facilitates comparison with other gravity theories
Supports applications in quantum gravity and numerical relativity
Abstract
The 3+1 (ADM) formulation of General Relativity is used in, for example, canonical quantum gravity and numerical relativity. Here we present a 3+1 decomposition of the minimal Standard-Model Extension gravity Lagrangian. By choosing the leaves of foliation to lie along a timelike vector field we write the theory in a form which will allow for comparison and matching to other gravity models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
A 3+1 Decomposition of the Minimal Standard-Model Extension Gravitational Sector
Nils A. Nilsson
1 Kellie O’Neal-Ault
2
and Quentin G. Bailey2
1National Centre for Nuclear Research, Pasteura 7, 05-077, Warsaw, Poland
2Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, 3700 Willow Creek Road, Prescott, AZ 86301, USA
Abstract
The 3+1 (ADM) formulation of General Relativity is used in, for example, canonical quantum gravity and numerical relativity. Here we present a 3+1 decomposition of the minimal Standard-Model Extension gravity Lagrangian. By choosing the leaves of foliation to lie along a timelike vector field we write the theory in a form which will allow for comparison and matching to other gravity models.
\bodymatter
1 Introduction
Local Lorentz invariance is one of the cornerstones of General Relativity (GR) and modern physics. As such it is an excellent probe of new physics, and Lorentz violation is a large and active area of research.[1] The Standard-Model Extension (SME) is an often-used effective field theory framework which includes all Lorentz and CPT violating terms.[2, 3, 4]
The 3+1 (ADM) version of GR is used in for example canonical quantum gravity and numerical relativity.[5, 6] Here we present a 3+1 decomposition of the minimal SME gravity Lagrangian in the case of explicit Lorentz- symmetry breaking. By choosing the hypersurfaces to be spatial, we write the framework in a form which will allow for comparison and matching to other gravity models.
2 The Decomposition
Using the ADM variables, the metric reads:
[TABLE]
where is the lapse function and is the shift vector. These ADM variables relate points on different constant-time hypersurfaces (see Figure 1), Decomposition of the manifold induces the metric , where is a vector normal to the foliation. The minimal gravitational sector of the SME reads as:[4, 7]
[TABLE]
where , is the trace-free Ricci tensor, and is the Weyl tensor. In the isotropic limit we can write the above Lagrangian as:
[TABLE]
where a superscript (4) denotes quantities defined on . Here, we focus on explicit symmetry breaking so that dynamical terms in the action vanish.[8] The above Lagrangian can be rewritten as:
[TABLE]
and by using the Gauss, Gauss-Codazzi, and Ricci equations we can write down the fully decomposed formulation of the gravitational sector (GR + minimal SME):
[TABLE]
where is the Lie derivative along the vector field , is the covariant derivative associated with the induced metric , is the trace of the spatial part of , and denotes the extrinsic curvature of the foliation. Moreover, we define the acceleration vector and the three-dimensional Ricci scalar . GR is recovered when .
3 Discussion & Conclusions
Using standard tools in numerical relativity theory we have derived a 3+1 decomposition of the minimal SME gravity Lagrangian in the isotropic limit. We make no linearised gravity approximations, and thus this is an exact result. This complements other exact studies of the SME.[9] Our results can be used in ongoing work on identifying the dynamical degrees of freedom in the explicit symmetry breaking case and matching to proposed models of quantum gravity.
Acknowledgments
NAN was partly supported by NCBJ Young Scientist Grant MNiSW 212737/E-78/M/2018. QGB and KA acknowledge support National Science Foundation grant number 1806871, and support of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT Violation , V.A. Kostelecký, N. Russel, Rev.Mod.Phys. 83 (2011) 11-31
- 2[2] CPT violation and the standard model , V.A. Kostelecký, D. Colladay, Phys.Rev. D 55 (1997) 6760-6774
- 3[3] Lorentz violating extension of the standard model , V.A. Kostelecký, D. Colladay, Phys.Rev. D 58 (1998) 116002
- 4[4] Gravity, Lorentz Violation, and the Standard Model , V.A. Kostelecký, Phys.Rev. D 69 (2004) 105009
- 5[5] Numerical Relativity: Solving Einstein’s Equations on the Computer , T.W. Baumgarte and S.L. Shapiro, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
- 6[6] Quantum Gravity , K. Kiefer, Oxford University press, 2012.
- 7[7] Signals for Lorentz violation in post-Newtonian gravity , Q.G. Bailey, V.A. Kostelecký, Phys.Rev. D 74 (2006) 045001
- 8[8] Gravity Theories with Background Fields and Spacetime Symmetry Breaking , R. Bluhm, Symmetry 9, 230 (2017) .
