TL;DR
This paper introduces a method for estimating uncertainty in one-stage object detection models, enhancing detection accuracy and providing valuable confidence measures for autonomous vehicle perception tasks.
Contribution
It proposes a novel approach to quantify uncertainty in one-stage detectors, improving detection performance and enabling better decision-making in autonomous driving.
Findings
Uncertainty estimates correlate with detection accuracy.
The approach improves baseline detection performance.
Uncertainty relates to pedestrian occlusion levels.
Abstract
Environment perception is the task for intelligent vehicles on which all subsequent steps rely. A key part of perception is to safely detect other road users such as vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists. With modern deep learning techniques huge progress was made over the last years in this field. However such deep learning based object detection models cannot predict how certain they are in their predictions, potentially hampering the performance of later steps such as tracking or sensor fusion. We present a viable approaches to estimate uncertainty in an one-stage object detector, while improving the detection performance of the baseline approach. The proposed model is evaluated on a large scale automotive pedestrian dataset. Experimental results show that the uncertainty outputted by our system is coupled with detection accuracy and the occlusion level of pedestrians.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Uncertainty Estimation in One-Stage Object Detection
Florian Kraus1 and Klaus Dietmayer2 1Florian Kraus is with Daimler AG, 89081 Ulm, Germany, 2Klaus Dietmayer is with Institute of Measurement, Control and Microtechnology, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
abstract introduction related_work method experiments conclusion_and_acknowledgments
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Y. Gal and Z. Ghahramani, “Bayesian convolutional neural networks with Bernoulli approximate variational inference,” in 4th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) workshop track , 2016.
- 2[2] A. Kendall and Y. Gal, “What uncertainties do we need in bayesian deep learning for computer vision?” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 , I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, Eds. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017, pp. 5574–5584.
- 3[3] D. Feng, L. Rosenbaum, and K. Dietmayer, “Towards safe autonomous driving: Capture uncertainty in the deep neural network for lidar 3d vehicle detection,” in 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) , Nov 2018, pp. 3266–3273.
- 4[4] S. Wirges, M. Reith- Braun, M. Lauer, and C. Stiller, “Capturing object detection uncertainty in multi-layer grid maps,” ar Xiv:1901.11284 [cs.RO] , Jan 2019.
- 5[5] D. Miller, L. Nicholson, F. Dayoub, and N. Sünderhauf, “Dropout sampling for robust object detection in open-set conditions,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , May 2018, pp. 1–7.
- 6[6] J. Redmon and A. Farhadi, “Yolov 3: An incremental improvement,” ar Xiv:1804.02767 [cs.CV] , Apr 2018. [Online]. Available: https://pjreddie.com/darknet/yolo/
- 7[7] M. Abadi et al. , “Tensor Flow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems,” 2015. [Online]. Available: www.tensorflow.org
- 8[8] J. Huang, V. Rathod, C. Sun, M. Zhu, A. Korattikara, A. Fathi, I. Fischer, Z. Wojna, Y. Song, S. Guadarrama, and K. Murphy, “Speed/accuracy trade-offs for modern convolutional object detectors,” in The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , July 2017.
