Digital Normativity: A challenge for human subjectivization and free will
\'Eric Fourneret, Blaise Yvert

TL;DR
This paper discusses how the rise of AI-driven digital normativity challenges human autonomy and free will, emphasizing the need for ethical reflection and education to maintain human subjectivity amid technological progress.
Contribution
It analyzes the normative influence of AI on human decision-making and advocates for ethical considerations and educational integration to preserve human subjectivity.
Findings
AI's normative role may threaten human autonomy
Ethical reflection is essential in AI development
Educational programs should address AI implications
Abstract
Over the past decade, artificial intelligence has demonstrated its efficiency in many different applications and a huge number of algorithms have become central and ubiquitous in our life. Their growing interest is essentially based on their capability to synthesize and process large amounts of data, and to help humans making decisions in a world of increasing complexity. Yet, the effectiveness of algorithms in bringing more and more relevant recommendations to humans may start to compete with human-alone decisions based on values other than pure efficacy. Here, we examine this tension in light of the emergence of several forms of digital normativity, and analyze how this normative role of AI may influence the ability of humans to remain subject of their life. The advent of AI technology imposes a need to achieve a balance between concrete material progress and progress of the mind to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
