The Convolutional Tsetlin Machine

TL;DR

The paper introduces the Convolutional Tsetlin Machine (CTM), an interpretable, hardware-friendly alternative to CNNs that uses clauses as convolution filters, achieving high accuracy on several benchmarks.

Contribution

It extends the Tsetlin Machine framework by developing the CTM, which employs clauses as convolution filters with location-awareness, maintaining interpretability and competitive accuracy.

Findings

Achieves 99.4% accuracy on MNIST

Attains 96.31% on Kuzushiji-MNIST

Reaches 91.5% on Fashion-MNIST

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have obtained astounding successes for important pattern recognition tasks, but they suffer from high computational complexity and the lack of interpretability. The recent Tsetlin Machine (TM) attempts to address this lack by using easy-to-interpret conjunctive clauses in propositional logic to solve complex pattern recognition problems. The TM provides competitive accuracy in several benchmarks, while keeping the important property of interpretability. It further facilitates hardware-near implementation since inputs, patterns, and outputs are expressed as bits, while recognition and learning rely on straightforward bit manipulation. In this paper, we exploit the TM paradigm by introducing the Convolutional Tsetlin Machine (CTM), as an interpretable alternative to CNNs. Whereas the TM categorizes an image by employing each clause once to the whole image, the CTM uses each clause as a convolution filter. That is, a clause is evaluated multiple times, once per image patch taking part in the convolution. To make the clauses location-aware, each patch is further augmented with its coordinates within the image. The output of a convolution clause is obtained simply by ORing the outcome of evaluating the clause on each patch. In the learning phase of the TM, clauses that evaluate to 1 are contrasted against the input. For the CTM, we instead contrast against one of the patches, randomly selected among the patches that made the clause evaluate to 1. Accordingly, the standard Type I and Type II feedback of the classic TM can be employed directly, without further modification. The CTM obtains a peak test accuracy of 99.4% on MNIST, 96.31% on Kuzushiji-MNIST, 91.5% on Fashion-MNIST, and 100.0% on the 2D Noisy XOR Problem, which is competitive with results reported for simple 4-layer CNNs, BinaryConnect, Logistic Circuits and an FPGA-accelerated Binary CNN.