Neural-Symbolic Argumentation Mining: an Argument in Favor of Deep Learning and Reasoning
Andrea Galassi, Kristian Kersting, Marco Lippi, Xiaoting Shao, Paolo, Torroni

TL;DR
This paper advocates for combining neural-symbolic and statistical relational learning to enhance argumentation mining with advanced reasoning capabilities, bridging the gap left by pure deep learning approaches.
Contribution
It introduces the idea of integrating neural-symbolic methods with deep learning to improve reasoning in argumentation mining, a novel perspective in the field.
Findings
Neural-symbolic approaches can enhance reasoning in argumentation mining.
Combining symbolic and sub-symbolic methods addresses current limitations.
The proposed integration could lead to more advanced argumentation analysis.
Abstract
Deep learning is bringing remarkable contributions to the field of argumentation mining, but the existing approaches still need to fill the gap toward performing advanced reasoning tasks. In this position paper, we posit that neural-symbolic and statistical relational learning could play a crucial role in the integration of symbolic and sub-symbolic methods to achieve this goal.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
