A SiO J = 5 - 4 Survey Toward Massive Star Formation Regions

TL;DR

This survey of 199 massive star-forming regions using SiO J=5-4 line emission reveals diverse shock-related phenomena across different evolutionary stages, with no significant variation in SiO abundance or luminosity among these stages.

Contribution

First large-scale SiO J=5-4 survey across multiple evolutionary stages of massive star formation regions, providing new insights into shock activities and chemical properties.

Findings

SiO emission detected in 57% of sources, with varying detection rates across stages.

Presence of both broad and narrow SiO lines indicating high-velocity and low-velocity shocks.

No significant difference in SiO luminosity or abundance among different evolutionary stages.

Abstract

We performed a survey in the SiO $J=5\rightarrow4$ line toward a sample of 199 Galactic massive star-forming regions at different evolutionary stages with the SMT 10 m and CSO 10.4 m telescopes. The sample consists of 44 infrared dark clouds (IRDCs), 86 protostellar candidates, and 69 young \HII\ regions. We detected SiO $J=5\rightarrow4$ line emission in 102 sources, with a detection rate of 57\%, 37\%, and 65\% for IRDCs, protostellar candidates, and young \HII\ regions, respectively. We find both broad line with Full Widths at Zero Power (FWZP) $>$ 20 \kms and narrow line emissons of SiO in objects at various evolutionary stages, likely associated with high-velocity shocks and low-velocity shocks, respectively. The SiO luminosities do not show apparent differences among various evolutionary stages in our sample. We find no correlation between the SiO abundance and the luminosity-to-mass ratio, indicating that the SiO abundance does not vary significantly in regions at different evolutionary stages of star formation.

Full text

An example of a Research Note of the American Astronomical Society (RNAAS)

Ethan Vishniac

Editor-in-Chief

Johns Hopkins University

Chris Lintott

RNAAS Editor

Oxford University

Greg J. Schwarz

American Astronomical Society

2000 Florida Ave., NW, Suite 300

Washington, DC 20009-1231, USA

August Muench

American Astronomical Society

2000 Florida Ave., NW, Suite 300

Washington, DC 20009-1231, USA

editorials, notices — miscellaneous — catalogs — surveys

1

Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society (RNAAS) is a publication in the AAS portfolio (alongside ApJ, AJ, ApJ Supplements, and ApJ Letters) through which authors can promptly and briefly share materials of interest with the astronomical community in a form that will be searchable via ADS and permanently archived.

The astronomical community has long faced a challenge in disseminating information that may not meet the criteria for a traditional journal article. There have generally been few options available for sharing works in progress, comments and clarifications, null results, and timely reports of observations (such as the spectrum of a supernova), as well as results that wouldn’t traditionally merit a full paper (such as the discovery of a single exoplanet or contributions to the monitoring of variable sources).

Launched in 2017, RNAAS was developed as a supported and long-term communication channel for results such as these that would otherwise be difficult to broadly disseminate to the professional community and persistently archive for future reference.

Submissions to RNAAS should be brief communications - 1,000 words or fewer 111An easy way to count the number of words in a Research Note is to use the texcount utility installed with most LaTeX installations. The call texcount -incbib -v3 rnaas.tex) gives 57 words in the front matter and 493 words in the text/references/captions of this template. Another option is by copying the words into MS/Word, and using “Word Count” under the Tool tab., and no more than a single figure (e.g. Figure 1) or table (but not both) - and should be written in a style similar to that of a traditional journal article, including references, where appropriate, but not including an abstract.

Unlike the other journals in the AAS portfolio, RNAAS publications are not peer reviewed; they are, however, reviewed by an editor for appropriateness and format before publication. If accepted, RNAAS submissions are typically published within 72 hours of manuscript receipt. Each RNAAS article is issued a DOI and indexed by ADS (Kurtz et al., 2000) to create a long-term, citable record of work.

Articles can be submitted in LaTeX (preferably with the new ”RNAAS” style option in AASTeX v6.2), MS/Word, or via the direct submission in the Authorea or Overleaf online collaborative editors.

Authors are expected to follow the AAS’s ethics (Kennicutt et al., 2006), including guidance on plagiarism (Vishniac, 2012).

Acknowledge people, facilities, and software here but remember that this counts against your 1000 word limit.