Not all groups are LEF groups, or can you know if a group is infinite?
Melvyn B. Nathanson

TL;DR
This paper introduces the class of locally embeddable into finite groups (LEF groups), exploring their properties and significance in group theory.
Contribution
It provides an introduction and foundational overview of LEF groups, clarifying their characteristics and importance.
Findings
LEF groups are a significant class in group theory
Not all groups are LEF groups, especially infinite groups
Understanding LEF groups aids in the study of group approximations
Abstract
This is an introduction to the class of groups that are locally embeddable into finite groups.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Not all groups are LEF groups, or
can you know if a group is infinite?
Melvyn B. Nathanson
Lehman College (CUNY), Bronx, New York 10468
Abstract.
This is an introduction to the class of groups that are locally embeddable into finite groups.
Key words and phrases:
Infinite group, LEF group, local embeddings of groups.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
20E25, 20F05,20-02.
1. Finite or infinite?
A simple question: Do the finite subsets of a group tell us if the group is infinite? Assume that we can only see the finite subsets of a group, and, also, that we can determine if a finite subset is a subset of some finite group. This means that we can answer the following question. Let be a finite subset of a group . Does there exist a finite group and a partial homomorphism that is one-to-one. A partial homomorphism from a subset of a group to a group is a function such that, if and , then . A one-to-one partial homomorphism is also called a local embedding. Of course, if the group is finite, then, for every subset of , the restriction of the identity homomorphism on to the subset is a local embedding into a finite group.
Does there exist an infinite group such that every finite subset of looks like (equivalently, can be partially embedded into) a subset of a finite group? Does there exist an infinite group in which some finite subset of is not also a subset of a finite group?
Theorem 3 answers the second question. The following example answers the first question. Let be a nonempty finite subset of the infinite abelian group . Choose an integer
[TABLE]
Consider the function defined by for all . This is a partial homomorphism because it is the restriction of the canonical homomorphism from to . For , we have if and only if if and only if divides . The inequality implies that if and only if , and so is a local embedding. Thus, every finite subset of the infinite group can be embedded into a finite cyclic group. By looking only at finite subsets, we cannot decide if is infinite.
Let us call a group locally embeddable into finite groups, or an LEF group, if every finite subset of can be embedded into a finite group. Mal’cev [5] introduced this concept in general algebraic structures. Vershik and Gordon [8] extended it to groups, and obtained many fundamental results.
Here are two classes of LEF groups.
Theorem 1**.**
Every locally finite group is an LEF group. Every abelian group is an LEF group.
Proof.
A group is locally finite if every finite subset generates a finite group. For such groups, the proof is immediate from the definition.
For abelian groups, the proof follows easily from the structure theorem for finitely generated abelian groups, and an easy modification of the preceding argument that is an LEF group. ∎
It is natural to ask: Is every infinite group an LEF group, or does there exist an infinite group that is not an LEF group?
2. Finitely presented groups
Let be a group with identity , and let be a subset of that generates . We assume that . The length of an element with is the smallest positive integer such that there is a representation of in the form
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
We define . Note that if and only if or for some .
For every nonnegative integer , we define the “closed ball”
[TABLE]
We have
[TABLE]
If the generating set is finite, then, for every , the group contains only finitely many elements of length , and so the is a finite subset of .
If , then satisfies (1) and (2) for some . For all , the partial product
[TABLE]
has length , and so . (We observe that if , then , which is absurd. Therefore, for all .) Let . Note that and that
[TABLE]
for all . If is a partial homomorphism, then
[TABLE]
For partial products in finite groups, see Nathanson [6].
Let be a nonempty set, and let be the free group generated by . Let be a nonempty subset of . The normal closure of in , denoted , is the smallest normal subgroup of that contains . The subgroup is generated by the set
[TABLE]
A group is finitely presented if
[TABLE]
where is the free group generated by a finite set and the subgroup is the normal closure of a finite subset of . If is the canonical homomorphism, then the set
[TABLE]
generates .
The following result is Proposition 1.10 in Pestov and Kwiatkowska [7].
Theorem 2**.**
Let be a finitely presented infinite group. If is an LEF group, then contains a nontrivial proper normal subgroup. Equivalently, a finitely presented infinite simple group is not an LEF group.
Proof.
Let be a finitely presented infinite group, where is the free group generated by a finite set , and is the normal closure of a finite subset of . Let be the identity in . The identity in is . The canonical homomorphism is defined by for all .
Choose an integer such that
[TABLE]
The closed ball
[TABLE]
is a finite subset of . We have
[TABLE]
The set
[TABLE]
is a finite subset of that contains . Also, .
If is an LEF group, then there exist a finite group and a local embedding of into . Let be the identity in . For all , we have and so
[TABLE]
By the universal property of a free group, there exists a unique homomorphism
[TABLE]
such that
[TABLE]
for all . The subgroup
[TABLE]
is a normal subgroup of . We shall prove that
[TABLE]
The diagram is
[TABLE]
If , then for all . Because and , we have
[TABLE]
Because is one-to-one and , it follows that for all . The set generates , and so is the trivial group, which is absurd. Therefore, is a proper normal subgroup of .
Next we prove that contains . Let . There is a nonnegative integer such that
[TABLE]
where is a sequence of elements of and is a sequence of elements of .
Because , we have and
[TABLE]
Therefore, . Because and is a normal subgroup of , it follows that contains , which is the normal closure of , and so .
Finally, if , then is isomorphic to a subgroup of the finite group , and so is finite, which is absurd. Therefore, is a proper subgroup of .
This proves relation (3). The correspondence theorem in group theory implies that is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup of , and so is not a simple group. It follows that no finitely presented infinite simple group is an LEF group. This completes the proof. ∎
Theorem 3**.**
There exist infinite groups that are not LEF groups. In particular, the Thompson groups and are not LEF groups.
Proof.
The Thompson groups and are finitely presented infinite simple groups (Cannon, Floyd, and Parry [2],Cannon and Floyd [1]). ∎
For recent work, including other examples of groups that are not LEF groups, see [4] and [3].
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] J. W. Cannon and W. J. Floyd, What is … … \ldots Thompson’s group? , Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 58 (2011), no. 8, 1112–1113.
- 2[2] J. W. Cannon, W. J. Floyd, and W. R. Parry, Introductory notes on Richard Thompson’s groups , Enseign. Math. (2) 42 (1996), no. 3-4, 215–256.
- 3[3] Y. Cornulier, Sofic profile and computability of Cremona groups , Michigan Math. J. 62 (2013), no. 4, 823–841.
- 4[4] Y. de Cornulier, L. Guyot, and W. Pitsch, On the isolated points in the space of groups , J. Algebra 307 (2007), no. 1, 254–277.
- 5[5] A. Malcev, On isomorphic matrix representations of infinite groups , Rec. Math. [Mat. Sbornik] N.S. 8 (50) (1940), 405–422.
- 6[6] M. B. Nathanson, Partial products in finite groups , Discrete Math. 15 (1976), no. 2, 201–203.
- 7[7] V. G. Pestov and A. Kwiatkowska, An introduction to hyperlinear and sofic groups , Appalachian Set Theory 2006–2012, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 406, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013, pp. 145–185.
- 8[8] A. M. Vershik and E. I. Gordon, Groups that are locally embeddable in the class of finite groups , Algebra i Analiz 9 (1997), no. 1, 71–97.
