Reply to arXiv:1810.11506: Size Effect According to the Critical Shear Crack Theory (CSCT) for Reinforced Concrete Beams and Slabs
Aurelio Muttoni, Miguel Fern\'andez Ruiz

TL;DR
This paper defends the Critical Shear Crack Theory (CSCT) against criticisms, reaffirming its validity for predicting size effects in reinforced concrete beams and slabs by referencing prior supporting research.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive rebuttal to criticisms of CSCT, consolidating previous evidence to reinforce the theory's credibility in structural engineering.
Findings
CSCT effectively predicts size effects in reinforced concrete.
Previous research supports the validity of CSCT hypotheses.
The critique in arXiv:1810.11506 is addressed and countered.
Abstract
This document is a reply to arXiv:1810.11506. In that document, D\"onmez and Ba\v{z}ant raise a number of criticism on the hypotheses Critical Shear Crack Theory (CSCT). The aspects criticized have however been largely discussed in previous works of the CSCT, proving the validity of the theory. This document compiles such previous knowledge as a reply to the authors of the report.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
