From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices
Jessica Morley, Luciano Floridi, Libby Kinsey, Anat Elhalal

TL;DR
This paper reviews existing AI ethics tools and methods, aiming to bridge the gap between ethical principles and practical implementation in machine learning development.
Contribution
It introduces a typology to help developers apply ethics throughout the AI pipeline and identifies areas needing further research.
Findings
Initial typology of AI ethics tools and methods
Identification of gaps between principles and practices
Guidance for integrating ethics in ML development
Abstract
The debate about the ethical implications of Artificial Intelligence dates from the 1960s. However, in recent years symbolic AI has been complemented and sometimes replaced by Neural Networks and Machine Learning techniques. This has vastly increased its potential utility and impact on society, with the consequence that the ethical debate has gone mainstream. Such debate has primarily focused on principles - the what of AI ethics - rather than on practices, the how. Awareness of the potential issues is increasing at a fast rate, but the AI community's ability to take action to mitigate the associated risks is still at its infancy. Therefore, our intention in presenting this research is to contribute to closing the gap between principles and practices by constructing a typology that may help practically-minded developers apply ethics at each stage of the pipeline, and to signal to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
