Significance of parallel computing on the performance of Digital Image Correlation algorithms in MATLAB

TL;DR

This study evaluates how parallel computing impacts the performance of Digital Image Correlation algorithms in MATLAB, highlighting the importance of implementation choices and hardware in achieving real-time analysis.

Contribution

It systematically compares various DIC algorithms and parallelization strategies, revealing practical performance insights and optimal configurations for real-time applications.

Findings

Newton-Raphson with modified Particle Swarm is most effective

Implementation issues can negate theoretical algorithm advantages

Proper parallel task selection is crucial for speedup

Abstract

Digital Image Correlation (DIC) is a powerful tool used to evaluate displacements and deformations in a non-intrusive manner. By comparing two images, one of the undeformed reference state of a specimen and another of the deformed target state, the relative displacement between those two states is determined. DIC is well known and often used for post-processing analysis of in-plane displacements and deformation of specimen. Increasing the analysis speed to enable real-time DIC analysis will be beneficial and extend the field of use of this technique. Here we tested several combinations of the most common DIC methods in combination with different parallelization approaches in MATLAB and evaluated their performance to determine whether real-time analysis is possible with these methods. To reflect improvements in computing technology different hardware settings were also analysed. We found that implementation problems can reduce the efficiency of a theoretically superior algorithm such that it becomes practically slower than a sub-optimal algorithm. The Newton-Raphson algorithm in combination with a modified Particle Swarm algorithm in parallel image computation was found to be most effective. This is contrary to theory, suggesting that the inverse-compositional Gauss-Newton algorithm is superior. As expected, the Brute Force Search algorithm is the least effective method. We also found that the correct choice of parallelization tasks is crucial to achieve improvements in computing speed. A poorly chosen parallelisation approach with high parallel overhead leads to inferior performance. Finally, irrespective of the computing mode the correct choice of combinations of integer-pixel and sub-pixel search algorithms is decisive for an efficient analysis. Using currently available hardware real-time analysis at high framerates remains an aspiration.