Simulation Typology and Termination Risks
Alexey Turchin, Michael Batin, David Denkenberger, Roman Yampolskiy

TL;DR
This paper classifies possible human-involving simulations, argues they are likely run by aliens, and analyzes their risks of termination due to glitches or catastrophic events, highlighting short-term vulnerabilities.
Contribution
It introduces a new perspective that aliens are likely the simulators and classifies various simulation types, assessing their termination risks.
Findings
Simulations are likely run by alien civilizations.
Most simulations face termination risks within centuries.
Certain simulations, like resurrectional ones, are more resilient.
Abstract
The goal of the article is to explore what is the most probable type of simulation in which humanity lives (if any) and how this affects simulation termination risks. We firstly explore the question of what kind of simulation in which humanity is most likely located based on pure theoretical reasoning. We suggest a new patch to the classical simulation argument, showing that we are likely simulated not by our own descendants, but by alien civilizations. Based on this, we provide classification of different possible simulations and we find that simpler, less expensive and one-person-centered simulations, resurrectional simulations, or simulations of the first artificial general intelligence's (AGI's) origin (singularity simulations) should dominate. Also, simulations which simulate the 21st century and global catastrophic risks are probable. We then explore whether the simulation could…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life · Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
