# Image quality assessment for determining efficacy and limitations of   Super-Resolution Convolutional Neural Network (SRCNN)

**Authors:** Chris M. Ward, Josh Harguess, Brendan Crabb, Shibin Parameswaran

arXiv: 1905.05373 · 2019-05-15

## TL;DR

This paper evaluates the effectiveness of Super-Resolution CNNs in image quality enhancement using traditional metrics like BRISQUE, SSIM, and PSNR, highlighting their limitations and capabilities.

## Contribution

It introduces a framework for assessing super-resolution methods with standard quality metrics to understand their efficacy and limitations.

## Key findings

- BRISQUE, SSIM, and PSNR effectively quantify image quality improvements.
- Metrics help determine the lowest recoverable image quality.
- Evaluation reveals strengths and limitations of SRCNN.

## Abstract

Traditional metrics for evaluating the efficacy of image processing techniques do not lend themselves to understanding the capabilities and limitations of modern image processing methods - particularly those enabled by deep learning. When applying image processing in engineering solutions, a scientist or engineer has a need to justify their design decisions with clear metrics. By applying blind/referenceless image spatial quality (BRISQUE), Structural SIMilarity (SSIM) index scores, and Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) to images before and after image processing, we can quantify quality improvements in a meaningful way and determine the lowest recoverable image quality for a given method.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.05373/full.md

## Figures

84 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.05373/full.md

## References

7 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.05373/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.05373