Mean dimension and metric mean dimension for non-autonomous dynamical systems
Fagner Bernardini Rodrigues, Jeovanny de Jesus Muentes Acevedo

TL;DR
This paper extends the concepts of mean dimension and metric mean dimension to non-autonomous dynamical systems, exploring their properties and applications to single continuous maps.
Contribution
It introduces new definitions for mean dimension and metric mean dimension in non-autonomous systems and investigates their properties and applications.
Findings
Extended mean dimension concepts to non-autonomous systems
Analyzed properties of the extended definitions
Applied the concepts to single continuous maps
Abstract
In this paper we extend the definitions of mean dimension and metric mean di-mension for non-autonomous dynamical systems. We show some properties of this extension and furthermore some applications to the mean dimension and metric mean dimension of single continuous maps.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Mean dimension and metric mean dimension for non-autonomous dynamical systems
Fagner B. Rodrigues and Jeovanny Muentes Acevedo
Fagner B. Rodrigues, Departamento de Matemática, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Jeovanny de Jesus Muentes Acevedo, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, Cartagena de Indias - Colombia
Abstract.
In this paper we extend the definitions of mean dimension and metric mean dimension for non-autonomous dynamical systems. We show some properties of this extension and furthermore some applications to the mean dimension and metric mean dimension of single continuous maps.
Key words and phrases:
Non-autonomous dynamical systems, mean dimension, metric mean dimension, topological entropy
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
37B55, 37B40, 37A35
1. Introduction
In the late 1990’s, M. Gromov in [2] introduced the notion of mean dimension for a topological dynamical system ( is a compact topological space and is a continuous map on ), which is, as well as the topological entropy, an invariant under conjugacy. In [11], Lindenstrauss and Weiss showed that the mean dimension is zero if the topological dimension of is finite. They gave some examples where the mean dimension is positive. For instance, they proved that the mean dimension of , where is the two-sided full shift map on , which has infinite topological entropy, is equals to and that any non-trivial factor of has positive mean dimension.
Given a dynamical system , an interesting question related to such a system is the following: under what conditions is it possible to imbed such a system in the shift space ? That is, what properties the system must have to guarantee the existence of a continuous map satisfying ? In [11] the authors proved that a necessary condition for an invertible system to be embedded in is that , where denotes the mean dimension of the system . In [12] it was proved that if is an invertible system which is an extension of a minimal system, and is a convex set with non-empty interior such that , then can be embedded in the shift space . In particular, if , then can be embedded in . More recently, Gutman and Tsukamoto [4] showed that, that if is a minimal system with then we can embed it in . In [13, Theorem 1.3], Lindenstrauss and Tsukamoto constructed a minimal system with mean dimension equal to which cannot be embedded into , showing that the constant obtained in [4] is optimal.
The notion of metric mean dimension for a dynamical system was introduced in [11], where is a compact metric space with metric and is a continuous map. It refines the topological entropy for systems with infinite entropy, which, in the case of a manifold of dimension greater than one, form a residual subset of the set consisting of homeomorphisms defined on the manifold (see [18]). In fact, every system with finite topological entropy has metric mean dimension equals to zero and for any metric equivalent to on one has , where denotes the metric mean dimension of with respect to (see [10], [11]). The metric mean dimension depends on the metric , therefore it is not a topological invariant. However, for a metrizable topological space , is invariant under topological conjugacy, where the infimum is taken over all the metrics on which induce the topology on . In [10], Theorem 4.3, the author proved that if is an extension of a minimal system, then there exists a metric on , equivalent to , such that .
B. Kloeckner ([7]) studied the dynamical system , where is the space of probability measures on the circle and is the push-forward map induced by a -expanding map . The author shows if we take the Wasserstein metric with cost function () on , denoted by , then . H. Lee (in [9]) introduced the mean dimension for continuous actions of countable sofic groups on compact metrizable spaces and proved that, in this setting, the mean dimension is an important tool for distinguishing continuous actions of countable sofic groups with infinite entropy.
A non-autonomous dynamical system (or a sequential dynamical system) is a sequence of continuous maps , where is a compact topological space for every . In the last two decades, several authors have tried to extend some results that are valid for autonomous systems for the non-autonomous case. Kolyada and Snoda in [8] introduced the notion of topological entropy for this setting and proved that, just as in the case of autonomous systems, it is an invariant under equiconjugacy and furthermore that it is concentrated in the non-wandering set of the dynamics (see [8] and [15]). In a more recent work, Freitas et al [1] have analyzed the existence of Extreme Value Laws in this setting. In [16] Stadlbauer guarantees, under appropriate conditions, the existence of a spectral gap for transference operators associated with sequential systems.
As we said above, the set consisting of continuous maps with infinite topological entropy is residual. On the other hand, it is easy to build non-autonomous dynamical systems with infinite topological entropy (take a continuous map with positive topological entropy, then is a non-autonomous dynamical systems with infinite topological entropy). This is the main reason to extend the concepts of mean dimension and metric mean dimension to non-autonomous systems, since these become a tool to classify non-autonomous dynamical systems with infinite topological entropy (see Theorem 6.1).
In the next two sections we will extend the mean dimension and the metric mean dimension for a non-autonomous dynamical system , which will be denoted by . Furthermore, we will prove some properties which are valid for the entropy of non-autonomous dynamical systems (see [8] and [15]). An application of these properties is that, for any continuous maps and on , the compositions and have the same mean dimension (see Corollary 2.7). Furthermore, Remark 4.2 proves the inequality can be strict. Proposition 3.5 proves if or then for each , there exists a continuous map on with metric mean dimension equals to . In Theorem 4.6 we show that, as the topological entropy, the metric mean dimension is concentrated in the non-wandering set of the dynamics.
In Section 5 we will discuss some upper bounds for the metric mean dimension of both autonomous and non-autonomous dynamical systems.
As we said above, the metric mean dimension for single continuous maps, and consequently for non-autonomous dynamical systems, depends on the metric . In Section 6 we will discuss some properties related to the invariance of the metric mean dimension under topological equiconjugacy.
In the last section we will present some results related to the continuity of the metric mean dimension.
Some ideas given to proof the results that are well-known for the autonomous case work or can be adapted for the non-autonomous case. We will present these proofs for the sake of comprehensiveness.
2. Mean dimension for non-autonomous dynamical systems
Let be a compact metric space. In this section we will suppose that is a non-autonomous dynamical system, where is a continuous map for all . We write to denote a non-autonomous dynamical system f on endowed with the metric . For define
[TABLE]
Set
[TABLE]
Given an open cover of define
[TABLE]
and set
[TABLE]
where is the indicator function and means that is an open cover of finner than .
Definition 2.1**.**
The mean dimension of is defined to be
[TABLE]
By Corollary 2.5 of [11] we have that , for any open covers and . It follows that the limit that defines the mean dimension is well defined.
Remark 2.2**.**
We present a list of some important properties about the mean dimension for both autonomous and non-autonomous dynamical systems:
- (1)
For a non-autonomous dynamical system given by the iterates of a single continuous map , i.e., , the definition of mean dimension coincides with the one presented in [11], that is, 2. (2)
Recall that for a topological space , the topological dimension is defined as
[TABLE]
where runs the open covers of . If , then for all and therefore for any . 3. (3)
In [11], Proposition 3.1, is proved that where is the shift on . Analogously we can prove 4. (4)
If , then (see [11], Proposition 3.3). 5. (5)
It is clear that if is an invariant subset by a continuous map , then . We can define the mean dimension for any as follows: let be an open cover of and consider , the open cover of given by the restriction of to . Then define
[TABLE]
It is clear that . 6. (6)
A necessary condition for an invertible dynamical system to be imbeddable in is that (see [11], Corollary 3.4). 7. (7)
Any nontrivial factor of has positive mean dimension (see [11], Theorem 3.6).
We will show some properties of the mean dimension which are valid for the topological entropy. Denote by the topological entropy of f (see [8], [15]).
Definition 2.3**.**
For any , set
[TABLE]
It is well-known that for any , where is any continuous map. For non-autonomous dynamical systems we have
[TABLE]
(see [8], Lemma 4.2). In general, the equality is not valid, as we can see in the next example, which was given by Kolyada and Snoha in [8].
Example 2.4**.**
Take defined by for any . Consider , where
[TABLE]
for any . Then and .
The equality is valid if the sequence is equicontinuous (see [8], Lemma 4.4). On the other hand, the equality always holds for the mean dimension.
Proposition 2.5**.**
For any and we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let be an open cover of . Note that, for ,
[TABLE]
which implies that . For the converse, note that
[TABLE]
and therefore
[TABLE]
which proves the proposition. ∎
In [8], Lemma 4.5, Kolyada and Snoha proved that
[TABLE]
where is the left shift . Furthermore, in [15], Corollary 5.6, the author showed that if each is an homeomorphism then the equality holds, that is, the topological entropy for non-autonomous dynamical systems is independent on the first maps on a sequence of homeomorphisms . Next proposition shows that these properties also hold for the mean dimension.
Proposition 2.6**.**
Let be two positive integers with . Then
[TABLE]
If each is a homeomorphism then the equality holds.
Proof.
It is enough to prove the proposition for and . For any open cover of we have
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
and therefore
Next, suppose that each is a homeomorphism. Note that if refines then . Therefore, we have
[TABLE]
Hence . ∎
If some is not a homeomorphism, then the inequality above can be strict. In fact, take for any , where is any continuous map with positive mean dimension and a constant map. Then and .
Next corollary follows from Propositions 2.5 and 2.6:
Corollary 2.7**.**
Let and , where are continuous maps. Then
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
Proof.
It follows directly from Proposition 2.6 that . Now, by Proposition 2.5 we have
[TABLE]
which proves the corollary. ∎
It follows directly from Corollary 2.7 that if and are topologically conjugate continuous maps, then
[TABLE]
since if is a topological conjugacy between and , that is, is a homeomorphism and , then
[TABLE]
For any , the asymptotic mean dimension is defined by the limit
[TABLE]
It follows from Proposition 2.6 that the asymptotic mean dimension always exists.
Theorem 2.8**.**
Let . If f converges uniformly to a continuous map , then
[TABLE]
In particular,
Proof.
Let be a sequence of mutually different point converging to a point . Define the map by , where
[TABLE]
Note that the non wandering set of , , is a subset of the fix fiber . Since
[TABLE]
(by [3, Lemma 7.2]), we have that
[TABLE]
Therefore,
[TABLE]
for all (see Remark 2.2, item (3)). Next, note that by the definition of we have that
[TABLE]
and . Hence, , for all . ∎
Next example proves that the inequality above can be strict.
Example 2.9**.**
Let be a continuous map with positive mean dimension. For each , set defined by
[TABLE]
where and as . Note that converges uniformly on to as and
[TABLE]
On the other hand, note that as for any and . Hence for any , where and therefore .
3. Metric mean dimension for non-autonomous dynamical systems
Throughout this section, we will fix where is a compact metric space with metric . For any let defined by
[TABLE]
Thus is a metric on for all and generates the same topology induced by . Fix . We say that is an -separated set if , for any two distinct points . We denote by the maximal cardinality of an -separated subset of . Given an open cover of , we say that is an -cover if the -diameter of any element of is less than . Let be the minimum number of elements in an -cover of . We say that is an -spanning set for if for any there exists such that . Let be the minimum cardinality of any -spanning subset of . By the compactness of , , and are finite real numbers.
Definition 3.1**.**
We define the lower metric mean dimension of and the upper metric mean dimension of by
[TABLE]
respectively, where .
It is not difficult to see that
[TABLE]
where and This fact holds for the upper metric mean dimension. We will write to refer to both and .
Topological entropy for non-autonomous dynamical systems is invariant under uniform equiconjugacy (see [8] and [15]). Metric mean dimension for single dynamical systems depends on the metric on . Consequently, it is not an invariant under conjugacy and therefore it is not an invariant under uniformly equiconjugacy between non-autonomous dynamical systems. Set
[TABLE]
and take
[TABLE]
For single maps, is an invariant under topological conjugacy. In Proposition 6.1 we will prove an analogous result for non-autonomous dynamical systems.
Remark 3.2**.**
It follows from the definition of the topological entropy for non-autonomous dynamical systems introduced in [8] that if the topological entropy of the non-autonomous system is finite then its metric mean dimension is zero.
Next, we will present some examples of the the metric mean dimension for both autonomous and non-autonomous dynamical systems. In Section 5 we will show more examples.
Take or . Consider the metric on defined by
[TABLE]
Take , endowed with the metric for In [12], Example E, is proved that Analogously, we can prove that
Lemma 3.3**.**
Take endowed with the metric for Thus
[TABLE]
Proof.
Fix and take , where . Note that . Consider the open cover of given by
[TABLE]
Note that has length . Let . Next, consider the following open cover of :
[TABLE]
Each open set has diameter less than with respect to the distance (see (3.2)). Therefore
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
On the other hand, any two distinct points in the sets
[TABLE]
have distance with respect to . It follows that
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Hence ∎
Next example proves that there exist dynamical systems on the interval with positive metric mean dimension (see also [17]).
Example 3.4**.**
Take , defined by , and , where for . For each , let be the unique increasing affine map from (which has length ) onto and take any strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers . Consider the continuous map such that, for each , .
Fix . Note that can be divided into intervals with the same length , such that
[TABLE]
Next, can be divided into intervals with the same length such that
[TABLE]
Inductively, we can prove that for all and , where , we can divide into intervals with the same length such that
[TABLE]
Each has length for each . Furthermore, each has length for each .
Take for each . If and where and each is odd, then
[TABLE]
For each there are more than intervals with odd, . Hence and then
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
hence We will obtain from Proposition 5.4 that . Therefore
Since and , the map induces a continuous map on with metric mean dimension equal to 1. More generally, we have:
Proposition 3.5**.**
Take or For each , there exists with .
Proof.
Any constant map has metric mean dimension equal to 0. On the other hand, Example 3.4 proves that there exist continuous maps on with metric mean dimension equal to 1. Fix and take . Set and for , where . For each , take , and as in Example 3.4. Consider the continuous map such that, for each , (note that and , consequently induces a continuous map on ). Fix . Each can be divided into intervals with the same length , such that
[TABLE]
Next, can be divided into intervals with the same length such that
[TABLE]
Inductively, we can prove that for all and , where , we can divide into intervals with the same length such that
[TABLE]
Each has length for each .
Take for each . Each has -diameter equal to . Consequently, and then
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
On the other hand, fix . Let be such that . Therefore
[TABLE]
Note that for each and , where , the subintervals have diameter less than with the metric for any . Consequently, we have
[TABLE]
For each , divide each interval into subintervals with the same length, where . Each subinterval has -diameter less than , thus
[TABLE]
For , each has -diameter less than , thus
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
Therefore ∎
Example 3.6**.**
Let with its usual metric and consider , where is given by , for any . Note that . We claim that . Fix . Take a positive integer so that . Now consider a -separated set for the shift map of maximum cardinality and note that is an -separated set for f. Therefore, and then
[TABLE]
Hence, by the definition of the upper metric mean dimension, we have
[TABLE]
In [19], Zhu, Liu, Xu, and Zhang showed that if is a -dimensional Riemannian manifold and is a sequence of -maps on such that for all , then
[TABLE]
Hence, by Remark 3.2, we have:
Proposition 3.7**.**
If , we have
Any sequence of homeomorphisms on both the interval or the circle has zero topological entropy (see [8], Theorem D). Therefore, the metric mean dimension of any f on both the interval or the circle is equal to zero. In the next example we will see that there exist non-autonomous dynamical systems consisting of diffeomorphisms on a surface with infinite metric mean dimension.
Example 3.8**.**
Let be the diffeomorphism induced by a hyperbolic matrix with eigenvalue , where is the torus endowed with the metric inherited from the plane. Consider where for each . We have where is the set consisting of fixed points of a continuous map (see [5], Proposition 1.8.1). Furthermore,
[TABLE]
(see [5], Chapter 3, Section 2.e). Therefore,
[TABLE]
and hence .
Suppose the Hausdorff dimension of is finite. Let be a non-autonomous dynamical system where each is a -map on . We have that if then Therefore, if , where is the Lipschitz constant of , we have that and hence Thus if , then In particular, if is a compact Riemannian manifold and is a sequence of differentiable maps that , where is the derivative of we have that and hence
4. Some fundamental properties of the metric mean dimension
In this section we show some properties which are well-known for topological entropy and metric mean dimension for dynamical systems. In the next proposition we will consider , which was defined in Definition 2.3.
It is well-known that and if the sequence is equicontinuous, then the equality holds (see [8], Lemma 4.2). For the case of the metric mean dimension, we always have that . However we will present an example where the inequality can be strict even for single continuous maps (see Remark 4.2).
Proposition 4.1**.**
For any and , we have
[TABLE]
Consequently (see (3.1)),
[TABLE]
Proof.
Note that, for any positive integer , we have
[TABLE]
Thus and therefore
[TABLE]
Hence ∎
Remark 4.2**.**
In Example 3.4 we prove that there exists a continuous map such that , where for . It follows from Proposition 5.4 that for any we have Consequently, for any , which proves that the inequality in Proposition 4.1 can be strict for autonomous systems and therefore for non-autonomous systems.
If are invariant subsets under a continuous map , then
[TABLE]
It is clear this property is also valid for the metric mean dimension.
Proposition 4.3**.**
If are invariant subsets under , then
[TABLE]
If , , is a sequence of invariant subsets under , then
[TABLE]
Example 3.4 proves that the inequality can be strict (the sets , , are invariant under , however for each ).
Metric mean dimension can be defined on any subset of . Kolyada and Snoha in [8], Lemma 4.1, proved that if , then
[TABLE]
Analogously we can prove that:
Proposition 4.4**.**
If , then
[TABLE]
Definition 4.5**.**
We say that is a nonwandering point for f if for every neighbourhood of there exist positive integers and with . We denote by the set consisting of the nonwandering points of f.
It is well-known that for any continuous map we have This fact was proved for non-autonomous dynamical systems by Kolyada and Snoha in [8]. For mean dimension of single continuous maps this fact was proved by Gutman in [3], Lemma 7.2. For the metric mean dimension of non-autonomous dynamical systems we also have:
Theorem 4.6**.**
We have
[TABLE]
Proof.
It is clear that . Fix and . Let be an open -cover of with minimum cardinality. Take a minimal finite open subcover of , chosen from (note that is an -cover of ). By the minimality of we have that is an -cover of with minimum cardinality, which we denote by , i.e., .
The set is compact and consists of wandering points. We can cover by a finite number of wandering subsets, each of them contained in some element of . The sets defined before together with form a finite open cover of , finer than . Consider, for each , the open cover associated to the sequence . Note that each element of is of the form
[TABLE]
where , for . It implies that is a -cover of . Let and be nonempty open sets of for some . If , then
[TABLE]
intersects . In that case does not contain non-wandering points for f (and hence ). Now we estimate the number of elements of . Setting
[TABLE]
we have . In this case we have possibilities of the choice of a -element subset of and then these sets can appear as various s in ways. For the rest of s we can choice any element of . So, the number of elements of is bounded by
[TABLE]
Since and , this number is not larger than . Thus, using the fact that , we have
[TABLE]
As
[TABLE]
it follows that
[TABLE]
Taking the limsup as we obtain
[TABLE]
So,
[TABLE]
which proves the theorem. ∎
Definition 4.7**.**
A continuous map will be called -compatible if it is possible to find a finite open cover of such that .
Lindenstrauss and Weiss in [11], Theorem 4.2, proved that for any metric compatible with the topology of , we have
[TABLE]
for any continuous map . These ideas work in order to show the non-autonomous case: metric mean dimension is an upper bound for the mean dimension of non-autonomous dynamical systems. We will need the next proposition, whose proof can be found in [11], Proposition 2.4.
Proposition 4.8**.**
If is an open cover of , then if and only if there exists an -compatible continuous map , where has topological dimension .
Theorem 4.9**.**
For any metric on compatible with the topology of we have that
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let be an open cover of . We can assume that is of the form
[TABLE]
where each is an open cover of with two elements. For each define by
[TABLE]
It is not difficult to see that is Lipschitz, and .
Let be a common bound for the Lipschitz constants of all . For each positive integer define by
[TABLE]
As and we have that .
Now for each , for , denote by the projection of to the coordinates of the index set .
Claim. Let and . There exists so that, for all there exists which satisfies
[TABLE]
for any subset that satisfies .
Proof.
Let such that
[TABLE]
We notice that for sufficiently large we can cover by dynamical balls . Since is the common Lipschitz constant for all , we conclude that
[TABLE]
where . This fact implies that can be covered by balls in the norm of radius . Let be these balls, with .
Choose with uniform probability and notice that
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
Hence, with high probability, a random will satisfies the requirements. ∎
Claim. If satisfies for both and , and all ,
[TABLE]
then is compatible with .
Proof.
Given , define for and
[TABLE]
By the definition of we have that . It follows that is compatible with . ∎
For a fixed , consider and as in the first Claim. Set
[TABLE]
Then, .
Now, for each , denote by the set
[TABLE]
Since is in the interior of , one can define by mapping each to the intersection of the ray starting at and passing through and . For each of the -dimensional cubes that comprises we can define a retraction on in a similar fashion using as a center the projection of on . This will define a continuous retraction of onto . As long as there is some intersection of with the cubes in this process can be continued, thus we finally get a continuous projection of onto , a space of topological dimension equals to , with
[TABLE]
where . By construction, satisfies the hypotheses of the second claim. Thus . Moreover, since , we have .
Putting all together, we have constructed a compatible function from to a space of topological dimension less or equal to , and so
[TABLE]
As goes to zero we get that . ∎
The inequality in the theorem above can be strict for single maps and therefore for non-autonomous dynamical systems. In [10], Theorem 4.3, is proved that if a continuous map is an extension of a minimal system, then there is a metric on , equivalent to , such that
[TABLE]
5. Upper bound for the metric mean dimension
As we saw in Remark 2.2, we have , where or . Furthermore, if , then . In this section we will prove that the metric mean dimension of the shift on is equal to the box dimension of with respect to the metric , which will be defined below. This fact implies that the metric mean dimension of any continuous map is less or equal to the box dimension of with respect to the metric (see Proposition 5.4).
Definition 5.1**.**
For let be the minimum number of closed balls of radious needed to cover . The numbers
[TABLE]
are called, respectively, the upper Minkowski dimension (or upper box dimension) of and the lower Minkowski dimension (or lower box dimension) of , with respect to .
For any metric space we have
[TABLE]
where is the Hausdorff dimension of with respect to (see [6], Section II, A). If , then . However, there exist sets such that the inequalities above can be strict, as we will see in the next example, which also proves that neither nor are upper bounds for .
Example 5.2**.**
Let endowed with the metric for . In [6], Lemma 3.1, is proved that while Furthermore, we have
[TABLE]
(see [12], Section VII).
Using the Classical Variational Principle, in [17], Theorem 5, the authors claim to have proven that for any
[TABLE]
This fact can be proved generalizing the ideas given in [12], Example E:
Theorem 5.3**.**
For or we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
We will prove the case (the case can be proved analogously as in Lemma 3.3). Fix and take big enough such that . Let be the minimum number of closed -balls needed to cover . Consider the open cover of given by the open sets
[TABLE]
Note that each one of these open sets has diameter less than with respect to the distance on . Therefore and hence
[TABLE]
which implies that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
To prove the converse inequality, for let be a maximal set of points in which are -separated. For , consider the set
[TABLE]
and notice that it is -separated and its cardinality is bounded from below by . So
[TABLE]
and it implies that
[TABLE]
which proves the theorem. ∎
Next proposition proves the metric mean dimension of any dynamical system is bounded by the box dimension of the space (see [17], Remark 4).
Proposition 5.4**.**
For any continuous map we have
[TABLE]
In particular, if , then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Consider the embedding , defined by . We have . Therefore, is a closed subset of invariant by . Take the metric on defined by for any Clearly for any , therefore any -separated subset of with respect to is a -separated subset of with respect to . Hence
[TABLE]
and, analogously, ∎
Example 3.4 proves that there exist dynamical systems such that
[TABLE]
We can consider the asymptotic metric mean dimension as the limit
[TABLE]
Theorem 5.5**.**
If converges uniformly to a continuous map , then, for any ,
[TABLE]
Consequently,
[TABLE]
Proof.
See the proof of Theorem 2.8 and use Theorem 4.6. ∎
We can prove, as in Example 2.9, that the inequality above can be strict.
Theorem 5.5 and Proposition 5.4 imply that:
Corollary 5.6**.**
If converges uniformly to a continuous map on , then
[TABLE]
and therefore
[TABLE]
In particular, if then .
Example 3.6 proves that the box dimension is not an upper bound for the metric mean dimension of sequences that are not convergent. Next example shows the inequality in Corollary 5.6 can be strict.
Example 5.7**.**
For each take and
[TABLE]
where is the map in Example 3.4. Thus converges uniformly to as . In [8], Figure 3, is proved that the topological entropy for each . Hence, and therefore
[TABLE]
Example 5.8**.**
The sequence
[TABLE]
converges uniformly to as , where is the map in Example 3.4. Note that for (see Example 3.4). Hence
[TABLE]
Therefore By (5.1) we obtain that . Note that for any .
6. Uniform equiconjugacy and metric mean dimension
We say that the systems on and on are uniformly equiconjugate if there exists a equicontinuous sequence of homeomorphisms so that , for all , that is, the following diagram
[TABLE]
is commutative for all . In the case where , for all , we say that f and g are uniformly conjugate.
Note that the notion of uniform equiconjugacy does not depend on the metric on and . Indeed, if and are another metrics on and , respectively, then and are uniformly equiconjugate by the sequence and and are uniformly equiconjugate by the sequence . Hence, if and are uniformly equiconjugate by the sequence , then and are uniformly equiconjugate by the sequence .
Theorem 6.1**.**
Let and be two non-autonomous dynamical systems defined on the metric spaces and respectively.
- (i)
If f and g are uniformly conjugate then
[TABLE] 2. (ii)
If and are uniformly equiconjugate by a sequence of homeomorphisms that satisfies for any , then (see (3.1))
[TABLE] 3. (iii)
If and are uniformly equiconjugate by a sequence of homeomorphisms that satisfies for any , then
[TABLE] 4. (iv)
If and are uniformly equiconjugate by a sequence of homeomorphisms that satisfies for any and , then
[TABLE]
Proof.
(i) Let be a homeomorphism which conjugates f and g, i.e., for all . For an open cover of , consider , which is an open cover of . Now we notice that
[TABLE]
It implies that . Since, for any open cover of is of the form , for some open cover of ,
[TABLE]
(ii) Let be the sequence of equicontinuous homeomorphisms that equiconjugates f and g. So,
[TABLE]
By assumption we have
[TABLE]
Hence, we can define on the metric
[TABLE]
In particular, if is a -spanning set of in the metric and , then
[TABLE]
It follows that is an -spanning set of in the metric . So we obtain that
[TABLE]
and therefore
By an analogous argument we can prove (iii). Item (iv) follows from (ii) and (iii). ∎
Clearly the theorem implies that if and are topologically conjugate continuous maps, then
[TABLE]
which is a well-known fact.
The next corollaries follow from Theorem 6.1.
Corollary 6.2**.**
If are homeomorphisms, and , then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Note that the following diagram is commutative
[TABLE]
where is the identity of and , , …, . Furthermore, is an equicontinuous sequence of homeomorphisms. Therefore, f and g are uniformly equiconjugate. The corollary follows from Theorem 6.1, since the infimum is taken over a finite set. ∎
Next corollary means that if f is a sequence of homeomorphisms then the metric mean dimension is independent on the firsts elements in the sequence
Corollary 6.3**.**
Let be a non-autonomous dynamical system consisting of homeomorphisms. For any we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
It is sufficient to prove that for all . Fix . Take , where, for each , is the identity on and for . It follows from Corollary 6.2 that
[TABLE]
For each and we have
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
which proves the corollary. ∎
Next corollary follows from Corollary 6.3 and Proposition 4.1 (see the proof of Corollary 2.7).
Corollary 6.4**.**
For any homeomorphisms and defined on , we have
[TABLE]
7. On the continuity of the metric mean dimension
In this section we will show some results related to the continuity of the metric mean dimension of sequences of diffeomorphisms defined on a manifold. For any set
[TABLE]
where 111If we assume that is a Riemannian manifold Hence can be endowed with the product topology, which is generated by the sets
[TABLE]
where is an open subset of , for for some . The space with the product topology will be denoted by We can consider the map
[TABLE]
Clearly, if is a constant map, then is continuous.
Proposition 7.1**.**
If is not constant then is discontinuous at any .
Proof.
Fix . Since is not constant, there exists such that Let be any open neighborhood of f. For some , the sequence , defined by
[TABLE]
belongs to , by definition of . It is follow from Corollary 6.2 that which proves the proposition. ∎
Let be a -metric on . Suppose that . For any , if , then and therefore On the other hand, if , then is not necessarily zero.
In [15], Section 6, is proved that:
Proposition 7.2**.**
If is a sequence of -diffeomorphisms, there exists a sequence of positive numbers such that every sequence of diffeomorphisms with for each is uniformly equiconjugate to f by a sequence such that as .
Note that, if as , then for any and we have . Hence, it follows from Theorems 6.1 and Proposition 7.2 that
Corollary 7.3**.**
Given a sequence of diffeomorphisms , there exists a sequence of positive numbers such that if is a sequence of diffeomorphisms such that for each then
[TABLE]
Roughly, Corollary 7.3 means that if converges very quickly to zero as , then
[TABLE]
For each sequence of diffeomorphisms and a sequence of positive numbers , a strong basic neighborhood of f is the set
[TABLE]
The strong topology (or Whitney topology) on is generated by the strong basic neighborhoods of each . The space with the strong topology will be denoted by
Corollary 7.4**.**
For , let be the set consisting of diffeomorphisms. Then
[TABLE]
is a continuous map.
Proof.
Let . If follows from Theorem 7.2 that there exists a strong basic neighborhood such that every is uniformly equiconjugate to f. Thus, from Proposition 6.1 we have for all , which proves the corollary. ∎
A real valued function is called lower (respectively upper) semi-continuous on a point if
[TABLE]
is called lower (respectively upper) semi-continuous if is lower (respectively upper) semi-continuous on any point of .
Remark 7.5**.**
From now on, we will consider or .
Misiurewicz in [14], Corollary 1, proved that is lower semi-continuous. For the case of the metric mean dimension we have:
Proposition 7.6**.**
* is nor lower neither upper semi-continuous on maps with metric mean dimension in . Furthermore, is not lower semi-continuous on maps with metric mean dimension in and is not upper semi-continuous on maps with metric mean dimension in .*
Proof.
Let be a continuous map on . If , we can approximate by a continuous map with zero metric mean dimension (take a sequence of -maps converging to ). Next, suppose that . Firstly, take . Fix . Let be a fixed point of . Choose such that for any with . Let and be as in Example 3.4, with , , and . Take the continuous map on defined as
[TABLE]
where is the affine map on such that and Note that It follows from Proposition 4.3 that
[TABLE]
since . Analogously we can prove that any with metric mean dimension in can be approximated by both a continuous map with metric mean dimension equal to 1 and a continuous map with metric mean dimension equal to 0. These facts prove the proposition for . For , we can approximate any by a map with periodic points. We can prove analogously that can be approximate by a continuous map on with metric mean dimension equal to 0 or equal to 1, which proves the proposition for . ∎
Next, Kolyada and Snoha in [8], Theorem F, showed that is not lower semi-continuous, endowing with the metric
[TABLE]
Furthermore, they proved in Theorem G that is lower semi-continuous on any constant sequence . However, It follows from Proposition 7.6 that:
Corollary 7.7**.**
* is nor lower neither upper semi-continuous on any constant sequence . Consequently, is nor lower neither upper semi-continuous.*
Take on defined by for each , where is the map from Example 3.4. We have (see Example 3.8). Thus there exist non-autonomous dynamical systems on with infinite metric mean dimension. Consequently is unbounded.
We finish this work with the next result:
Theorem 7.8**.**
* is not lower semi-continuous on any non-autonomous dynamical system with non-zero metric mean dimension.*
Proof.
Let be a non-autonomous dynamical system with positive metric mean dimension. Let be a sequence in such that and as . Take . Thus as . However, for any , as . Consequently, the metric mean dimension of is zero for each . ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Freitas, Ana Cristina Moreira, Jorge Milhazes Freitas, and Sandro Vaienti. “Extreme value laws for non stationary processes generated by sequential and random dynamical systems.” Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, Probabilités et Statistiques . Vol. 53. No. 3. Institut Henri Poincaré, 2017.
- 2[2] Gromov, Misha. “Topological invariants of dynamical systems and spaces of holomorphic maps: I.” Mathematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry 2.4 (1999): 323-415.
- 3[3] Gutman, Yonatan. “Embedding topological dynamical systems with periodic points in cubical shifts.” Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 37.2 (2017): 512-538.
- 4[4] Gutman, Yonatan, and Masaki Tsukamoto. “Embedding minimal dynamical systems into Hilbert cubes.” ar Xiv preprint ar Xiv:1511.01802 (2015).
- 5[5] Katok, Anatole, and Boris Hasselblatt. Introduction to the modern theory of dynamical systems . Vol. 54. Cambridge university press, 1995.
- 6[6] Kawabata, Tsutomu, and Amir Dembo. “The rate-distortion dimension of sets and measures.” IEEE transactions on information theory 40.5 (1994): 1564-1572.
- 7[7] Kloeckner, Benoit. “Optimal transport and dynamics of expanding circle maps acting on measures.” Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 33.2 (2013): 529-548.
- 8[8] Kolyada, Sergii, and Lubomir Snoha. “Topological entropy of nonautonomous dynamical systems.” Random and computational dynamics 4.2 (1996): 205.
