High-order derivatives of the Bessel functions with an application
R B Paris

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the asymptotic behavior of high-order derivatives of Bessel functions and applies these results to evaluate related Laplace transforms as the order or transform variable becomes large.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed asymptotic analysis of the derivatives of Bessel functions and their application to incomplete Laplace transforms.
Findings
Asymptotic formulas for the derivatives of $J_ u(a)$ and $K_ u(a)$ as $n o
Asymptotic evaluation of two incomplete Laplace transforms involving Bessel functions.
Brief discussion on similar integrals with $Y_ u(t)$ and $I_ u(t)$.
Abstract
We determine the asymptotic behaviour of the th derivatives of the Bessel functions and , where is a fixed positive quantity, as . These results are applied to the asymptotic evaluation of two incomplete Laplace transforms of these Bessel functions on the interval as the transform variable . Similar evaluation of the integrals involving the Bessel functions and is briefly mentioned.
| 0 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||
| 2 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFractional Differential Equations Solutions · Mathematical functions and polynomials · Differential Equations and Boundary Problems
High-order derivatives of the Bessel functions with an application
R. B. Paris111E-mail address: [email protected]
*Division of Computing and Mathematics,
Abertay University, Dundee DD1 1HG, UK
Abstract
We determine the asymptotic behaviour of the th derivatives of the Bessel functions and , where is a fixed positive quantity, as . These results are applied to the asymptotic evaluation of two incomplete Laplace transforms of these Bessel functions on the interval as the transform variable . Similar evaluation of the integrals involving the Bessel functions and is briefly mentioned.
MSC: 33C10, 34E05, 41A30, 41A60
Keywords: high-order derivatives, Bessel functions, asymptotic expansion, Hadamard series, exponentially small terms
1. Introduction
In this note we examine the asymptotic behaviour of high derivatives of the Bessel functions and , where ; that is, we determine order estimates of and as . When is a non-negative integer, we determine an asymptotic expansion for as . These results are then applied to determine the asymptotic expansion of the integrals
[TABLE]
as . In the first integral we restrict to satisfy although it converges for ; in the second integral we can omit consideration of the case , since .
In the application of Watson’s lemma [4, p. 44], [5, p. 15] to the above integrals for large , the Bessel functions are replaced by their series expansions about and integration is extended to the infinite interval . This procedure then simply produces the convergent series expansions with the evaluations
[TABLE]
and222When , we have the limiting value .
[TABLE]
The above values of and coincide, of course, with the evaluations when the upper limit is replaced by ; see [6, p. 386(8), 388(9)].
As an application we employ the asymptotic behaviour of the high-order derivatives of and to determine the character of the exponentially small contributions to the asymptotic expansion of the integrals in (1.2) and (1.3) as . Similar integrals involving the Bessel functions and are briefly mentioned.
**2. The derivatives **
Let denote a positive integer and be a parameter. Then the th derivative of the Bessel function at can be written by Cauchy’s integral formula as
[TABLE]
where the integration path is a closed loop surrounding the origin in the positive sense not enclosing the branch point (when is non-integer). Now expand the contour into a large circular path of radius , together with paths along the upper and lower sides of the branch cut along connected by a small circular path of radius about the branch point. When there is no branch point and the integration path can be taken to be the circular circuit of radius .
For we can employ the asymptotic expansion of the Bessel function in the form [4, p. 228]
[TABLE]
valid as in , where \omega=x-\mbox{{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}}\pi\nu-\mbox{{\textstyle\frac{1}{4}}}\pi and the coefficients are given by
[TABLE]
It then follows that for large in
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and the bar denotes the complex conjugate.
The contribution to (2.1) from the expanded contour is then
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
upon making the change of variable . Here we have introduced
[TABLE]
and denotes a circular path of radius .
With , the exponential factor appearing in has a saddle point (where ) at , where . The path of steepest descent through the saddle is locally horizontal and passes to infinity in the upper half-plane. The path can be deformed to pass over the saddle and application of the method of steepest descents then yields
[TABLE]
where \psi_{s}\equiv\psi(w_{s})=1+\mbox{{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}}\pi i and [5, pp. 13–14]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
with
[TABLE]
being derivatives evaluated at . Using the values , , and , we find the values
[TABLE]
Combination of the expansions (2.3) and (2.4), together with the conjugate form of expansion for (with saddle point at ), then leads to
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
by Stirling’s formula for . The first few coefficients and are given by
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Now we deal with the branch-point contribution. First, the contribution from the small circular path of radius about the branch point is proportional to , which vanishes as since . The contribution from the upper and lower sides of the branch cut is
[TABLE]
since . Now [2, 6.563]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and we have employed the well-known bound for , to bound the second integral over . Making use of the fact that as [4, (5.11.12)], we find
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
as . Hence, it follows that333Use of for , shows immediately that in (2.6) is bounded by . for
[TABLE]
We remark that, when is an integer, the branch-point contribution is not present. Thus, collecting together the results in (2.5) and (2.7) we have the following theorem:
Theorem 1
* Let , and be a positive integer. Then*
[TABLE]
as , where \Phi=\mbox{{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}}\pi n+a-\mbox{{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}}\pi\nu.
The second result in (2.8) when and was given in [5, p. 126].
In Table 1 we present some numerical values of the absolute error in the computation of compared with the asymptotic expansion in (2.5). The numerical value of the th derivative follows from the expression [4, (10.6.7)]
[TABLE]
which can be further simplified when is an integer since .
3. The derivatives
Proceeding in the same manner as in Section 2, we have the th derivative of the modified Bessel function given by
[TABLE]
where the closed loop surrounds the origin in the positive sense excluding the branch point at . Note that the branch point is present when on account of the logarithmic nature of near .
We now expand the loop in (3.1) into a large circular contour of radius together with the indentation around the branch point . Since for in , it is readily seen that the above integral possesses a saddle point at on the branch cut. Choose ; the saddle-point contribution is then of order
[TABLE]
The contribution from the small circular path of radius round the branch point is controlled by as for ; in the case , the contribution is controlled by as .
The contribution from the upper and lower sides of the branch cut is
[TABLE]
From the result [4, (10.34.2)], we have
[TABLE]
In the appendix it is established that
[TABLE]
as . Hence
[TABLE]
to yield the following theorem:
Theorem 2
* Let , and be a positive integer. Then*
[TABLE]
as .
We remark that the derivatives of the -Bessel function can be evaluated by means of the formula [4, (10.29.5)]
[TABLE]
4. The asymptotic expansion of the integrals and
We first consider the integral which can be written as
[TABLE]
where and we take . Thus [6, p. 386(8)]
[TABLE]
where we have put .
The Taylor series expansion of is
[TABLE]
where, from Theorem 1 describing the behaviour of for large , it is seen that the series converges for when is non-integer, but converges for when \nu=0,1,2,\ldots\. When is non-integer the integral on the right-hand side of (4.1) becomes
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where is the normalised incomplete gamma function and
[TABLE]
Use of the bound shows that .
The series in (4.2) is an example of a Hadamard expansion; see [5, Ch. 2] for a full discussion of the use of such expansions in hyperasymptotic evaluation. The presence of the incomplete gamma function in this series acts as a ‘smoothing’ factor on the coefficients , since the behaviour of is given by
[TABLE]
Thus, changes from approximately unity when \alpha\,\raisebox{-3.44444pt}{\mbox{\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\textstyle<}}{{\sim}}}}\,x to a rapid decay to zero when \alpha\,\raisebox{-3.44444pt}{\mbox{\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\textstyle>}}{{\sim}}}}\,x. Consequently, the early terms () in the above series behave like those of the associated Poincaré asymptotic series
[TABLE]
Hence, for and non-integer we have the asymptotic expansion
[TABLE]
as and fixed finite .
For integer values of we have the absolutely convergent expansion
[TABLE]
The case of (4.4) when , has been given444There is a misprint in [5, (2.3.5)]: the should be . in [5, p. 125].
A similar treatment of the integral yields, when ,
[TABLE]
where [6, p. 388(9)]
[TABLE]
The Taylor series series expansion of given by
[TABLE]
converges for by Theorem 2. Thus, the integral appearing on the right-hand side of (4.5) becomes
[TABLE]
where, by the inequality in (A.1) valid for ,
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
From [4, (8.11.2)] the upper incomplete gamma function has the behaviour as , so that is exponentially small555When , the bound () [1] shows that is also exponentially small in in this case. as with bounded away from zero.
Hence we obtain the asymptotic expansion
[TABLE]
as with fixed finite , where is defined in (4.6).
5. Concluding remarks
We have investigated the high-order derivatives of the Bessel functions and for and applied these results to determine the asymptotic character of the expansion of two incomplete Laplace transforms of these functions as the transform variable . In the case of the integer order Bessel function the expansion was shown to be convergent. The connection of these expansions to the recently developed theory of Hadamard expansions has been indicated. However, although hyperasymptotic precision is possible with this latter procedure, this aspect is not pursued here.
A similar procedure can be employed to determine the expansion of the integrals involving the Bessel functions and given by
[TABLE]
Then we have the expansions as
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
The derivatives and can be obtained from (2.9) with replaced by , and from (3.4) with replaced by and the factor replaced by .
When , where is a non-negative integer, we have the convergent expansion
[TABLE]
since routine calculations similar to those described in Section 2 show that
[TABLE]
Appendix: Estimation of two integrals appearing in
In this appendix we estimate the growth of the integrals appearing in efined in (3.3) for large . Consider first the integral, where is a fixed parameter,
[TABLE]
From [1], we have the bounds
[TABLE]
whence, for ,
[TABLE]
Now, since (), we have
[TABLE]
where . Evaluation of this last integral as the lower incomplete gamma function and use of its asymptotic behaviour for large [4, (8.11.2)] shows that as
[TABLE]
Hence the lower bound satisfies
[TABLE]
For the upper bound we have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
as . This yields the extimate
[TABLE]
Consequently, from (A.2)–(A.4) it follows that
[TABLE]
For the integral
[TABLE]
we employ the bounds [3]
[TABLE]
Then we obtain
[TABLE]
The integrand of the integral on the right-hand side of (A.6) has, when , a maximum at and an absolute minimum at (corresponding to the saddle point in (LABEL:e40)). Beyond this minimum point the integrand thereafter steadily increases. To estimate this integral for large , we divide the integration path into and , where \mbox{{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}}<\mu<1. The value of the integrand at is O( for large . The contribution from the interval is therefore O(, which is seen to be exponentially small as .
Now
[TABLE]
since p(x):=\log(1+x)-x+\mbox{{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}}x^{2}>0 for . Then
[TABLE]
and hence the contribution to from the interval is
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where . Thus, as , and we find
[TABLE]
with the correction terms from being exponentially small as . From (A.6) and (A.7) (applied when and ), it then follows that
[TABLE]
whence
[TABLE]
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] R.E. Gaunt, Inequalities for modified Bessel functions and their integrals, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 420 (2014) 373–386.
- 2[2] I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Rhyzik, Tables of of Integrals, Series and Products , Academic Press, New York 1980.
- 3[3] Y.L. Luke, Inequalities for generalized hypergeometric functions, J. Approx. Theory 5 (1972) 41–65.
- 4[4] F.W.J. Olver, D.W. Lozier, R.F. Boisvert and C.W. Clark (eds.), NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
- 5[5] R.B. Paris, Hadamard Expansions and Hyperasymptotic Evaluation , Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Vol. 141, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2011.
- 6[6] G.N. Watson, A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1952.
