Diskcyclicity of sets of operators and applications
Mohamed Amouch, Otmane Benchiheb

TL;DR
This paper generalizes the concept of diskcyclicity from single operators to sets of operators, establishing criteria and exploring applications to semigroups and groups, revealing conditions for their diskcyclicity.
Contribution
It introduces a diskcyclicity criterion for sets of operators and links this property to semigroups and groups, providing new insights into their structure and behavior.
Findings
Diskcyclic $C_0$-semigroups exist only on 1D or infinite-dimensional spaces.
Diskcyclicity and disk transitivity are equivalent for certain operator groups.
The paper establishes a relationship between diskcyclicity criteria and actual diskcyclicity.
Abstract
In this paper, we extend the notion of diskcyclicity and disk transitivity of a single operator to a subset of . We establish a diskcyclicity criterion and we give the relationship between this criterion and the diskcyclicity. As applications, we study the diskcyclicty of -semigroups and -regularized groups of operators. We show that a diskcyclic -semigroup exists on a complex topological vector space if and only if dim or dim and we prove that diskcyclicity and disk transitivity of a -semigroups and -regularized groups are equivalent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Diskcyclicity of sets of operators and applications
Mohamed Amouch and Otmane Benchiheb
Mohamed Amouch and Otmane Benchiheb, University Chouaib Doukkali. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of science Eljadida, Morocco
Abstract.
In this paper, we introduce and study the diskcyclicity and disk transitivity of a set of operators. We establish a diskcyclicity criterion and we give the relationship between this criterion and the diskcyclicity. As applications, we study the diskcyclicty of -semigroups and -regularized groups. We show that a diskcyclic -semigroup exists on a complex topological vector space if and only if dim or dim and we prove that diskcyclicity and disk transitivity of a -semigroups (resp -regularized groups) are equivalent.
Key words and phrases:
Hypercyclicity, supercyclicity, diskcyclicity, -semigroups of operators, -regularized groups of operators.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
47A16
1. Introduction and Preliminary
Let be a complex topological vector space and the space of all continuous linear operators on . By an operator, we always mean a continuous linear operator.
The most studied notion in linear dynamics is that of hypercyclicity An operator is called hypercyclic if there is some vector such that the orbit of under ;
[TABLE]
is a dense subset of , such a vector is called hypercyclic for . The set of all hypercyclic vectors for is denoted by . The first example of hypercyclic operator was given by Rolewicz in [17]. He proved that if is a backward shift on the Banach space , then is a hypercyclic operator for any complex number satisfying . Another important notion in dynamical system is that of supercyclicity. This notion was introduced by Hilden and Wallen in [12]. An operator T is called supercyclic if there is a vector such that the protective orbit of under ;
[TABLE]
is dense in . In this case, the vector is said to be a supercyclic vector for . The set of all supercyclic vectors for is denoted by . For the more detailed information on both hypercyclicity and supercyclicity, the reader may refer to [7, 11].
In the same spirit, since the operator is not hypercyclic whenever , we are motivated to study the disk orbit. An operator is said to be diskcyclic if there is some vector such that the disk orbit;
[TABLE]
is dense in . Such vector is called a diskcyclic vector for , and the set of all diskcyclic vectors for is denoted by .
An equivalent notion of the diskcyclicity in the case of a a second countable complex topological vector space is that of disk transitivity. An operator is said to be disk transitive if for each pair of nonempty open subsets of there exist and such that
[TABLE]
The diskcyclic criterion; a sufficient set of conditions for an operator to be diskcyclic, is one of most important characterization of the diskcyclicity. An operator is said to be satisfies the diskcyclicity criterion if there exist an increasing sequence of integers , a sequence , two dense sets , and a sequence of maps : such that
for any ;
for any ;
for any .
For a general overview of diskcyclicity and related proprieties in linear dynamics see [6, 13, 14, 18].
Let and be topological vector spaces. If and , then and are called quasi-conjugate or quasi-similar if there exists an operator : with dense range such that If can be chosen to be a homeomorphism, then and are called conjugate or similar, see [11, Definition 1.5]. A property is said to be preserved under quasi-similarity if for all , if has property , then every operator that is quasi-similar to has also property , see [11, Definition 1.7].
Recall that the strong operator topology (SOT for short) on is the topology with respect to which any has a neighborhood basis consisting of sets of the form
[TABLE]
where , are linearly independent and is a neighborhood of zero in , see [9].
Recall from [2] that a set of operators is called hypercyclic if there exists a vector in such that its orbit under ; , is dense in . If the protective orbit of under ; , is dense in , then is said to be supercyclic, see [3]. If span is dense in , then is said to be cyclic, see [1]. In each case, such a vector x is called a hypercyclic vector, a supercyclic vector, and a cyclic vector for , respectively.
In this paper, we introduce and study the notion of diskcyclicity for a set of operators which generalize the notion of diskcyclicity for a single operator. We deal with diskcyclic sets, we prove that some properties known for one diskcyclic operator remain true for a diskcyclic set of operators. It known that the set of diskcyclic vectors of a single operators is a type set. In section 2, we prove that this result holds for the set of diskcyclic vectors of a set of operators and we establish that diskcyclicity is preserved under quasi-similarity.
In section 3, we introduce the notion of disk transitive sets, strictly disk transitive sets, diskcyclic transitive sets, and the notion of diskcyclic criterion for sets of operators. We give relations between this notions and the concept of diskcyclic sets of operators and we prove that this notions are preserved under quasi-similarity or similarity.
In section 4, we give applications for strongly continues semigroups of operators. We show that a diskcyclic strongly continues semigroup of operators exists on a complex topological vector space if and only if dim or dim. Finally, we prove the equivalence between diskcyclicity and disk transitivity and we give necessary and sufficient conditions for a strongly continues semigroup of operators to be diskcyclic.
In section 5, we study the particular case when stands for a -regularized group of operators. We give an example of a -regularized group of operators on the complex field and we prove that, if is a diskcyclic -regularized group of operators and has dense range, then is disk transitive.
2. Diskcyclic sets of operators
Our main definition in this paper is that of diskcyclic set of operators. This definition is a generalization of the definition of a single diskcyclic operator.
Definition 2.1**.**
We say that a set is diskcyclic if there exists some for which the disk orbit of under
[TABLE]
is a dense subset of . Such vector is called a diskcyclic vector for or a diskcyclic vector. The set of all diskcyclic vectors for is denoted by .
Remark 2.2*.*
An operator is diskcyclic if and only if the set is diskcyclic.
A necessary bu not sufficient condition of diskcyclicity is due to the next proposition.
Proposition 2.3**.**
If is a diskcyclic vector for a set , then
[TABLE]
Proof Towards a contradiction, assume that and let such that . Since , there exists sequences of of and of such that It follows that and this is a contradiction.
Remark 2.4*.*
If is bounded, then can not be diskcyclic. Indeed, let . Since is bounded, By Proposition 2.3, can not be diskcyclic.
Let be a complex topological vector space and a subset We denote by the set of all elements of which commutes with every element of That is
[TABLE]
Proposition 2.5**.**
Assume that is diskcyclic and let be an operator with dense range. If , then , for all .
Proof Let be a nonempty open subset of . Since is continuous and of dense range, is a nonempty open subset of . Let , then there exist and such that , that is . Since , it follows that
[TABLE]
Hence, meets every nonempty open subset of . From this, is dense in . That is, .
Remark 2.6*.*
If , then , for all
Let and be topological vector spaces and let and . Recall from [1], that and are called quasi-similar if there exists an operator : with dense range such that for all there exists satisfying . If is a homeomorphism, then and are called similar.
The following proposition shows that the diskcyclicity of sets of operators is preserved under quasi-similarity.
Proposition 2.7**.**
Assume that and are quasi-similar, then is diskcyclic in implies that is diskcyclic in . Moreover,
[TABLE]
Proof Let be a nonempty open subset of , then is a nonempty open subset of . If , then there exist and such that , that is . Let such that . Hence,
[TABLE]
Thus, meets every nonempty open subset of . From this, we deduce that is dense in . That is, is diskcyclic and .
Corollary 2.8**.**
Assume that and are similar, then is diskcyclic in if and only if is diskcyclic in . Moreover,
[TABLE]
Proposition 2.9**.**
Let and . If is diskcyclic, then for all such that for all is diskcyclic.
Proof Let be a diskcyclic vector for . Since for all , it follows that
[TABLE]
Indeed, let . Put , then that is . Thus,
[TABLE]
Since is dense in , it follows that is dense in . Hence is diskcyclic in and is a diskcyclic vector of .
Let be a family of complex topological vector spaces and let be a subset of , for all . Define
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where is the operator defined in by
[TABLE]
Proposition 2.10**.**
Let be a family of complex topological vector spaces and a subset of for all . If is a diskcyclic set in , then is a diskcyclic set in , for all . Moreover, if , then , for all .
Proof Assume that is diskcyclic in and let be a diskcyclic vector for . For all , let be a nonempty open subset of , then is a nonempty open subset of . Since is dense in , there exist and ; such that
[TABLE]
that is , for all . Hence, is a diskcyclic set in and , for all .
The following proposition shows that the set of all diskcyclic operators of a set of operators is a type. Note that by we mean the set
Proposition 2.11**.**
Let be a second countable complex topological vector space and If is diskcyclic, then
[TABLE]
where is a countable basis of the topology of . As a consequence, is a type set.
Proof Let . Then, if and only if . Equivalently, for all that is for all , there exist and such that . This is equivalent to the fact that for all there exist and such that . Hence, Since for all the set is open, it follows that is a type set.
3. Density and disk transitivity of sets of operators
In the following definition, we introduce the notion of disk transitivity of sets of operators which generalizes the notion of disk transitivity of a single operator.
Definition 3.1**.**
A set is said to be disk transitive set if for any pair of nonempty open subsets of , there exist and such that
[TABLE]
Remark 3.2*.*
An operator is disk transitive if and only if
[TABLE]
is a disk transitive.
The following proposition proves that the disk transitivity of sets of operators is preserved under quasi-similarity.
Proposition 3.3**.**
Assume that and are quasi-similar. If is disk transitive in , then is disk transitive in .
Proof Since and are quasi-similar, there exists a continuous map : with dense range such that for all there exists satisfying . Let and be nonempty open subsets of . Since is continuous and of dense range, and are nonempty and open. Since is disk transitive in , there exist and with , which implies that and . Let such that . Then, and . Thus, Hence, is disk transitive in
Corollary 3.4**.**
Assume that and are similar. Then, is disk transitive in if and only if is disk transitive in .
In the following result, we give necessary and sufficient conditions for a set of operators to be disk transitive.
Theorem 3.5**.**
Let be a complex normed space and . The following assertions are equivalent
* is disk transitive;*
For each , there exists sequences in , in , in and in such that
[TABLE]
For each , and for a neighborhood of [math], there exist , and such that
[TABLE]
Proof Let , . For all , let and . Then and are nonempty open subsets of . Since is disk transitive, there exist and such that . For all , let such that , then
[TABLE]
which implies that
[TABLE]
Let , . There exists sequences in , in in and in such that
[TABLE]
Let be a neighborhood of zero, then there exists such that
[TABLE]
for all .
Let and be two nonempty open subsets of . Then there exist , such that and . Since for all , is a neighborhood of [math], there exist and such that
[TABLE]
This implies that
[TABLE]
Since and are nonempty open subsets of , and , there exists such that and , for all
Recall that an operator is diskcyclic if and only if it is disk transitive. Let be a subset of . In whats follows, we prove that if is disk transitive set then is diskcyclic.
Theorem 3.6**.**
Let be a second countable Baire complex topological vector space and . The following assertions are equivalent
* is dense in ;*
* is disk transitive.*
In this case, is diskcyclic and the set of all diskcyclic vectors of is a dense type set.
Proof Since is a second countable Baire complex topological vector space, we can consider a countable basis of the topology of .
Assume that is dense in and let and be two nonempty open subsets of . By Proposition 2.11, we have
[TABLE]
Hence, for all is dense in . Thus, for all we have which implies that for all there exist and such that . Since is a countable basis of the topology of , it follows that is a disk transitive set.
Assume that is disk transitive. Let , , then there exist and such that , which implies that . Hence, for all we have is dense in . Since is a Baire space, it follows that
[TABLE]
is a dense subset of .
The converse of Theorem 3.6 holds with some additional assumptions.
Theorem 3.7**.**
Assume that for all , with , there exists such that . Then is diskcyclic implies that is disk transitive.
Proof Since is diskcyclic, there exists such that is a dense subset of . Let and be two nonempty open subsets of , then there exist , with , and , such that
[TABLE]
There exists such that . By (3.1), we have
[TABLE]
which implies that . Hence, is disk transitive.
In the following definition we introduce the notion of strictly disk transitivity of set of operators. The case of hypercyclicity (resp, supercyclicity) was introduced in [4] (resp [3]).
Definition 3.8**.**
A set is called strictly disk transitive if for each pair of nonzero elements in , there exist some and some such that
Remark 3.9*.*
An operator is strictly disk transitive if and only if is strictly disk transitive.
Proposition 3.10**.**
If is strictly disk transitive set, then it is disk transitive. As a consequence, if is strictly disk transitive set, then it is diskcyclic.
Proof Assume that is a strictly disk transitive set. If and are two nonempty open subsets of , then there exist such that and . Since is strictly disk transitive, there exist and such that Hence,
[TABLE]
Thus, which implies that is disk transitive. By Theorem 3.6, we deduce that is diskcyclic.
In the following proposition, we prove that strictly disk transitivity of sets of operators is preserved under similarity.
Proposition 3.11**.**
Assume that and are similar. Then is strictly disk transitive in if and only if is strictly disk transitive in
Proof Since and are similar, there exists a homeomorphism : such that for all there exists satisfying . Assume that is strictly disk transitive in . Let , . There exist such that and . Since is strictly disk transitive in , there exists and such that , this implies that . Since and are similar, it follows that there exists such that . Hence, . Thus, is strictly disk transitive in .
For the converse, we do the same proof using the invertible operator of and the proof is completed.
Let be an element of a complex topological vector space . Define
Theorem 3.12**.**
For each pair of nonzero vectors , with , there exists a SOT-dense set that is not strictly disk transitive. Furthermore, is a dense nonstrictly disk transitive set if and only if is a dense subset of for some ,
Proof Fix nonzero vectors such that and put
It is clear that is not strictly disk transitive. Let be a nonempty SOT-open set in and . If and are such that , then . Otherwise, putting , we see that for some , but and are such that . Hence, and the proof is completed.
We prove the second assertion of the theorem. Suppose that is a dense subset of that is not strictly disk transitive. Then there are nonzero vectors such that for all and hence . To show that is dense in , assume that is an open subset of . Thus, for some open set in . Then .
For the converse, let be a dense subset of for some . Then is not strictly disk transitive. Also, since is a dense subset of , we conclude that is also dense in . Indeed, if is any open set in then since is dense in . On the other hand, is open in and so it must intersect since is dense in . Thus, and so is dense in .
In the following definition we introduce the notion of diskcyclic transitivity of set of operators. The case of hypercyclicity (resp, supercyclicity) was introduced in [4] (resp [3]).
Definition 3.13**.**
A set is said to be diskcyclic transitive if
[TABLE]
Remark 3.14*.*
Let be a complex topological vector space. An operator is diskcyclic transitive as an operator if and only if the set
[TABLE]
is diskcyclic transitive as a set of operators.
It is clear that a diskcyclic transitive set is diskcyclic. Moreover, the next proposition shows that diskcyclic transitivity of sets of operators implies disk transitivity.
Proposition 3.15**.**
If is diskcyclic transitive, then it is disk transitive.
Proof Let and be two nonempty open subsets of . There exists such that . Since is diskcyclic transitive, there exists and such that . This implies that Hence, is disk transitive.
Remark 3.16*.*
Let be a complex topological vector space and a subset of . Assume that is without isolated point and is diskcyclic transitive. To prove that is disk transitive one can remarks that and use Theorem 3.6.
The diskcyclic transitivity is preserved under similarity as show the next proposition.
Proposition 3.17**.**
Assume that and are similar. Then, is a diskcyclic transitive set in if and only if is a diskcyclic transitive set in .
Proof Since and are similar, there exists a homeomorphism : such that for all there exists satisfying . If is a diskcyclic transitive in , then by Proposition 2.7,
[TABLE]
Since is homeomorphism, the result holds.
For the converse, we do the same proof using the invertible operator of , and the proof is completed.
Assume that is a topological vector space and a subset of . The following result shows that the SOT-closure of is not large enough than to have more diskcyclic vectors.
Proposition 3.18**.**
If stands for the SOT-closure of then is diskcyclic if and only if is diskcyclic. Moreover, and have the same diskcyclic vectors, that is
[TABLE]
Proof We only need to prove that Fix and let be an arbitrary open subset of . Then there is some and such that . The set is a SOT-neighborhood of and so it must intersect . Therefore, there is some such that and this shows that .
Corollary 3.19**.**
A set is diskcyclic transitive if and only if is diskcyclic transitive.
Proof Assume that is diskcyclic transitive, then . Since by Proposition 3.18, , it follows that . Hence, is diskcyclic transitive. The implication is diskcyclic implies is diskcyclic is obvious which complete the proof.
Corollary 3.20**.**
A set is disk transitive if and only if is disk transitive.
Proof Direct consequence of Theorem 3.6 and Proposition 3.18.
In the next definition, we introduce the diskcyclic criterion of sets of operators which generalizes the definition of diskcyclic criterion of operators.
Definition 3.21**.**
We say that satisfies the criterion of diskcyclicity if there exist two dense subsets and of and sequences of positives integers, of , of and a sequence of maps : such that
for all ;
for all ;
for all .
Remark 3.22*.*
An operator satisfies the criterion of diskcyclicity if and only if satisfies the criterion of diskcyclicity.
Theorem 3.23**.**
Let be a second countable Baire complex topological vector space and a subset of . If satisfies the criterion of diskcyclicity, then is a dense subset of . As consequence; is diskcyclic.
Proof Assume that satisfies the diskcyclicity criterion. Let and be two nonempty open subsets of . Since and are dense in , there exist and in such that
[TABLE]
For all let . We have , which implies that . Since and is open, there exists such that , for all . On the other hand, we have . Since and is open, there exists such that , for all . Let max, then and , for all , that is
[TABLE]
for all . Hence, is disk transitive. By Theorem 3.6 we deduce that is a dense subset of . We use again Theorem 3.6 to conclude that is a diskcyclic set.
4. Diskcyclic strongly continuous semigroups of operators
In this section we will study the case when stands for a strongly continuous semigroup of operators.
Recall that a one-parameter family of operators on a complex topological vector space is called a strongly continuous semigroup of operators if the following three conditions are satisfied
the identity operator on ;
for all ;
for all and .
One also refers to it as a -semigroup.
The linear operator defined in
[TABLE]
by
[TABLE]
is the infinitesimal generator of the strongly continuous semigroup and is the domain of . For more informations about the theory of strongly continuous semigroups the reader may refer to [16].
The next example shows that there is a diskcyclic strongly continuous semigroups of operators on the complex field.
Example 4.1**.**
Let . For all , let be an operator defined by
[TABLE]
Then is strongly continuous semigroups of operators and we have
[TABLE]
Hence,
[TABLE]
Thus, is a diskcyclic strongly continuous semigroups of operators and is a diskcyclic vector of .
Remark 4.2*.*
Since all complex topological vector spaces of dimension one are isomorphe, we can deduce, by Using Example 4.1, that there exists a diskcyclic strongly continuous semigroups of operators on each one dimensional space.
Recall from [19, Lemma 5.1], that if is a complex topological vector space such that dim. Then supports no supercyclic strongly continuous semigroups of operators.
In the following theorem, we prove that the same results holds in the case of diskcyclicity.
Theorem 4.3**.**
Assume that that dim. Then supports no diskcyclic strongly continuous semigroups.
Proof We use [19, Lemma 5.1] and the fact that for all .
A necessary and sufficient condition for a strongly continuous semigroups of operators to be diskcyclic is due to next lemma and theorem. For the hypercyclicity (resp, the supercyclicity) version see [10, Theorem 2.2.] (resp, [15, Lemma 1] and [15, Lemma 2]).
Lemma 4.4**.**
Let be a diskcyclic strongly continuous semigroups of operators on a complex Banach infinite dimensional space . If is a diskcyclic vector of , then the following assertions hold:
* for all ;*
The set is dense in for all .
Proof Suppose that is minimal with the property that . First we show that for all , there exists some and such that . Since is a diskcyclic , there exist a sequence of and a sequence of such that
[TABLE]
Since is compact we may suppose that converges to some . Without loss of generality we may assume that converges to some and we infer that .
Now let , spanning a two-dimensional subspace, such that each pair , , , is linearly independent. Assume that . We have then . We have
[TABLE]
which is a contradiction.
Suppose that there exists some such that the set
[TABLE]
is not dense in X. Hence there exists a bounded open set such that . Therefore we have
[TABLE]
by using the relation
[TABLE]
Thus, is compact. Hence is finite dimensional, which contradicts that is infinite dimensional.
Theorem 4.5**.**
Let be a strongly continuous semigroup of operators on a complex separable Banach infinite dimensional space X. Then the following assertions are equivalent:
* is diskcyclic;*
for all , and all , there exist , and such that
[TABLE]
for all , , all and for all , there exist , and such that
[TABLE]
Proof : Assume that is diskcyclic and let be a diskcyclic vector for . Then
[TABLE]
is dense in . Let . For any , there exist and such that . If , then by Lemma 4.4, the set
[TABLE]
is a dense subset . For any , there exist and such that . Put , and . Then we have and
: It is obvious.
: Since is separable, we can consider a dense sequence in . Using this sequence, we construct sequences of , of and of inductively:
- •
Put , ;
- •
For , find , and such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
In particular, (4.1) implies that , so that the sequence has a limit . Applying (4.2) and once again (4.1) we infer that
[TABLE]
Let and , there exists , large enough, such that
[TABLE]
Choosing large enough such that , we obtain
[TABLE]
Therefore, is dense in . This means that is diskcyclic and is a diskcyclic vector for .
As a corollary we obtain a sufficient condition of diskcyclicity of a strongly continuous semigroup of operators.
Let be a separable Banach infinite dimensional space. Denote the set of all such that and the set of all such that for each there exist some and some with and
Theorem 4.6**.**
Let be a strongly continuous semigroup of operators on a complex separable Banach infinite dimensional space . If both and are dense subsets, then is diskcyclic.
Proof Let and . Then for each there are arbitrarily large , and such that
[TABLE]
Since , for sufficiently large we have . We put and infer
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
By using Theorem 3.7, we may prove that diskcyclicity and disk transitivity are equivalent in the case of strongly continuous semigroup of operators.
Theorem 4.7**.**
Let be a strongly continuous semigroup of operators on a complex topological vector space . Then, the following assertions are equivalent:
* is diskcyclic set;*
* is disk transitive.*
Proof By remarking that if , then there exists such that , and using Theorem 3.7.
Definition 4.8**.**
[16] Let be a strongly continuous semigroup of operators on a complex topological vector space . Given another topological vector space and an isomorphism from onto , we obtain a strongly continuous semigroup of operators on , called similar to , by defining
[TABLE]
for all .
Proposition 4.9**.**
Let be a diskcyclic strongly continuous semigroup of operators on a complex topological vector space . If is a strongly continuous semigroup of operators on similar to , then is diskcyclic on . Moreover,
[TABLE]
Proof Direct consequence of Proposition 2.7.
Definition 4.10**.**
[16] Let be a strongly continuous semigroup of operators on a complex topological vector space . For any numbers and , we define the rescaled strongly continuous semigroup of operators by
[TABLE]
for all .
Proposition 4.11**.**
Let be a diskcyclic strongly continuous semigroup of operators on a complex topological vector space . For any reel number , the rescaled strongly continuous semigroup of operators is diskcyclic.
Proof Let be a positive reel number and for all . To conclude the result, we apply Proposition 2.9 for and .
5. Diskcyclic -regularized groups of operators
In this section, we study the particular case when stands for a -regularized semigroup. Recall from [8], that an entire -regularized group of operators is an operator family on that satisfies
for every ,
The mapping , with , is entire for every .
An example of a diskcyclic -regularized groups of operators on the complex field is the following.
Example 5.1**.**
Let . For all , let , for all . is a -regularized group of operators and we have which implies that is diskcyclic and is a diskcyclic vector for .
Remark 5.2*.*
Since all complex topological vector spaces of dimension one are isomorphe, we can deduce, by Using Example 5.1, that there exists a diskcyclic -regularized group of operators on each one dimensional space.
Lemma 5.3**.**
Let be a diskcyclic -regularized group of operators in . If is of dense range, then , for all
Proof Let . By conditions and of Definition of a -regularized group of operators we have
[TABLE]
this means that commutes with every element of . Hence, . By using Proposition 2.5, we deduce , for all
Proposition 5.4**.**
Let be a diskcyclic -regularized group on a complex Banach space. If the identity operator on , then for all and for all .
Proof By remarking that in this case we have and using Proposition 2.5.
Definition 5.5**.**
Let be a -regularized group on a complex topological vector space. Given another complex topological vector space and an isomorphism from onto , the -regularized group on Y , defining by
[TABLE]
is said to be similar to .
Proposition 5.6**.**
Let be a diskcyclic -regularized group of operators on a complex topological vector space . If is a -regularized group of operators on a complex topological vector space similar to , then is diskcyclic on . Moreover,
[TABLE]
Proof Direct consequence of Proposition 2.7.
By Theorem 3.6, every disk transitive -regularized group is diskcyclic. In the following we prove the converse is also holds.
Theorem 5.7**.**
Let be a complex topological vector space and a -regularized group such that has dense range. The following assertions are equivalent
* is diskcyclic;*
* is disk transitive.*
Proof : This implication is due to Theorem 3.6.
Assume that is diskcyclic, we will prove that is disk transitive. Let . Let and be two nonempty open subsets of , then there exist , , such that
[TABLE]
Let . By 5.1, we have
[TABLE]
which implies that Hence, is a disk transitive -regularized group.
A necessary condition for a -regularized group of operators to be diskcyclic is is due to next theorem. This result is similar to Lemma 4.4 in the case of a strongly continuous semigroup of operators.
Theorem 5.8**.**
Let be a diskcyclic -regularized group on a Banach infinite dimensional space . If is a diskcyclic vector of , then the following assertions hold:
* for all ;*
The set is dense in for all .
Proof If is such that , then . Let . Then
[TABLE]
which contradicts that
Suppose that there exists such that is not dense in X. Hence there exists a bounded open set such that . Therefore we have
[TABLE]
by using the relation
[TABLE]
Since is continuous with and holds for all by , there exist , such that for with . There exists such that for any because is bounded. So we have
[TABLE]
which means that is compact. Hence is finite dimensional, which contradicts the fact that is infinite dimensional.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Amouch, M., Benchiheb, O.: On cyclic sets of operators, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 2. Ser (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s 12215-018-0368-4.
- 2[2] Amouch, M., Benchiheb, O.: On linear dynamics of sets of operators, Turk. J. Math., 43(1) , 402-411 (2019)
- 3[3] Amouch, M., Benchiheb, O.: On supercyclic sets of operators, ar Xiv:1810.07577 v 1 [math.FA] 17 Oct 2018.
- 4[4] Ansari, M., Hedayatian, K., Khani-robati, B.: On the density and transitivity of sets of operators, Turk. J. Math., 42(1) , 181-189 (2018)
- 5[5] Ansari, M., Hedayatian, K., Khani Robati, B., Moradi, A.: A note on topological and strict transitivity, Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Sci., 42(1) , 59-64 (2018)
- 6[6] Bamerni, N., Kiliçman, A., Noorani, M.S.M.: A review of some works in the theory of diskcyclic operators, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 39(2) , 723-739 (2016)
- 7[7] Bayart, F., Matheron, E.: Dynamics of linear operators, New York, NY, USA, Cambridge University Press, 2009
- 8[8] Conejero, J. A., Kostic, M., Miana, P. J., Murillo-Arcila, M.: Distributionally chaotic families of operators on Frechet spaces, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 15(5) , 1915-1939 (2016)
