On the Diophantine Equation 1/a + 1/b = (q+1) / pq
Jeremiah W. Johnson

TL;DR
This paper completely solves the Diophantine equation 1/a + 1/b = (q+1)/pq for integers a, b, where p and q are primes with q+1 dividing p-1, using elementary techniques.
Contribution
It provides a complete classification of solutions to a specific prime-related Diophantine equation with elementary methods.
Findings
All solutions are explicitly characterized.
The solutions depend on the divisibility condition q+1 | p-1.
The approach avoids advanced number theory techniques.
Abstract
Let and be distinct primes such that . In this paper we find all integer solutions , to the equation using only elementary methods.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Mathematical Theories and Applications · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Analytic Number Theory Research
On the Diophantine equation .
Jeremiah W. Johnson
University of New Hampshire, Manchester, NH 03101, USA
[email protected] https://mypages.unh.edu/jwjohnson
Abstract.
Let and be distinct primes such that . In this paper we find all integer solutions , to the equation using only elementary methods.
1. Introduction
Problem A1 of the 2018 William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition asked competitors to find all ordered pairs of positive integers for which [1]. This is an example of a Diophantine equation of the form , where and are distinct primes such that . In this note we generalize this problem and obtain all integer solutions to the equation for distinct primes such that using only elementary arithmetic.
Theorem 1**.**
Let
[TABLE]
where are distinct primes such that . There are two trivial solutions to equation 1; namely , and . The remaining integer solutions of equation 1 are given by the following formulæ:
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where and .
Proof.
Rewrite equation 1 as . Then , , or both. Consider first the case where and . Write and for . Then . If , this equation cannot be satisfied, so one of . Suppose , so , and , leading to the trivial solutions , and, mutatis mutandis, .
Suppose now that but . Again writing for , we have , or equivalently, . Since , it must be the case that . Write for . Then Since , .
Solving for and then and above leads to the formulæ given in equation 2. To obtain solutions in , it must be the case that and both and divide . The first condition is always satisfied given our earlier assumption that : writing , we have , and is divisible by . It can similarly be shown that . However, if and only if , leading to the result in Equation 2. If instead we assume that and , then, mutatis mutandis, we arrive at the solutions given in Equation 3. ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] The William Lowell Putnam mathematical competition. https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/Putnam/Competition_Arch–ive/2018 Putnam Problems.pdf, 2019.
