# Scale-relativistic corrections to the muon anomalous magnetic moment

## TL;DR

This paper introduces scale-relativistic corrections to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, proposing a new theoretical framework that aligns well with experimental discrepancies.

## Contribution

It develops a scale-relativistic approach to refine the theoretical calculation of the muon g-2, accounting for length-scale invariance and differentiating contributions based on mass and length scales.

## Key findings

- The correction matches the observed discrepancy in muon g-2.
- The correction depends on the Planck scale and fine structure constant.
- Numerical estimate aligns with experimental data.

## Abstract

The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon is one of the most precisely measured quantities in physics. Its experimental value exhibits a $4.2 \, \sigma$ discrepancy $\delta a_\mu=(251 \pm 59) \times 10^{-11}$ with its theoretical value calculated in the standard model framework, while they agree for the electron. The muon theoretical calculation involves a mass-dependent contribution which comes from two-loop vacuum polarization insertions due to electron-positron pairs and depends on the electron to muon mass ratio $x=m_e/m_\mu$. In standard quantum mechanics, mass ratios and inverse Compton length ratios are identical. This is no longer the case in the special scale-relativity framework, in which the Planck length-scale is invariant under dilations. Using the renormalization group approach, we differentiate between the origin of $ \ln x$ logarithmic contributions which depend on mass, and $x$ linear contributions which we assume to actually depend on inverse Compton lengths. By defining the muon constant $\mathbb{C}_\mu=\ln(m_\mathbb{P}/m_\mu)$ in terms of the Planck mass $m_\mathbb{P}$, the resulting scale-relativistic correction writes $\delta a_\mu= -\alpha^2 \, (x \:\ln^3 x)/(8 \; \mathbb{C}_\mu^2)$, where $\alpha$ is the fine structure constant. Its numerical value, $(230 \pm 16) \times 10^{-11}$, is in excellent agreement with the observed theory-experiment difference.