Wall-crossing and recursion formulae for tropical Jucys covers
Marvin Anas Hahn, Danilo Lewanski

TL;DR
This paper uses tropical geometry techniques to prove piecewise polynomiality and derive new wall-crossing formulas for monotone double Hurwitz numbers, advancing understanding of their enumerative properties.
Contribution
It introduces a novel application of tropical flows to establish polynomiality and wall-crossing formulas for monotone double Hurwitz numbers.
Findings
Proof of piecewise polynomiality of monotone double Hurwitz numbers
Derivation of new wall-crossing formulas
Enhanced understanding of tropical interpretations in enumerative geometry
Abstract
In recent work, the authors derived a tropical interpretation of monotone and strictly monotone double Hurwitz numbers. In this paper, we apply the technique of tropical flows to this interpretation in order to provide a new proof of the piecewise polynomiality of these enumerative invariants. Moreover, we derive new types of wall-crossing formulae.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Wall-crossing and recursion formulae for tropical Jucys covers
Marvin Anas Hahn
M. A. Hahn: Institut für Mathematik, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Robert-Mayer-Str. 6-8, 60325 Frankfurt am Main
and
Danilo Lewański
D. L.: Max Planck Institut für Mathematik, Vivatsgasse 7, 53111 Bonn, Germany.
Abstract.
In recent work, the authors derived a tropical interpretation of monotone and strictly monotone double Hurwitz numbers. In this paper, we apply the technique of tropical flows to this interpretation in order to provide a new proof of the piecewise polynomiality of these enumerative invariants. Moreover, we derive new types of wall-crossing formulae.
Key words and phrases:
Hurwitz numbers, Jucys correspondence, flows
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
14N10, 14N35, 14T05
Contents
-
4 Proofs of chamber polynomiality and of wall crossing formulae
-
5 A refined recursion for (strictly) monotone double Hurwitz numbers
1. Introduction
Hurwitz numbers [19] count branched genus coverings of the projective line with fixed ramification data. These objects connect several areas of mathematics, such as algebraic geometry, representation theory, mathematical physics and many more. In particular, they admit several equivalent definitions, among which is an interpretation due to Hurwitz in terms of factorisations in the symmetric group [20]. From this interpretation many variants of Hurwitz numbers arise by imposing additional conditions on the factorisations. In this paper, we focus on two such variants, namely monotone and strictly monotone Hurwitz numbers. Monotone Hurwitz numbers were introduced in [13] in the context random matrix theory as the coefficients in the asymptotic expansion of the HCIZ integral, while strictly monotone Hurwitz numbers are equivalent to counting certain Grothendieck dessins d’enfants [1].
In studying Hurwitz numbers, one often restricts onself to special allowed types of ramification. An important case is the one of single Hurwitz numbers, where one allows arbitrary ramification over but only simple ramification (i.e. ramification profile ) over other points, where is determined by the Riemann-Hurwitz formula. These numbers admit a stunning connection to Gromov-Witten theory: the celebrated ELSV formula expresses single Hurwitz numbers in terms of intersection numbers on the moduli space of stable curves with marked points [10]. As a direct consequence single Hurwitz numbers are polynomial in the ramification profile over up to a combinatorial factor.
From the study of single Hurwitz numbers, it is natural to consider arbitrary ramification over two points and simple ramification else. The numbers one obtains this way are called double Hurwitz numbers. It is an open question whether double Hurwitz numbers satisfy an ELSV-type formula, i.e. an expression in terms of intersection numbers on some moduli space. One idea to approach this problem was introduced by Goulden, Jackson and Vakil in [11]. Namely, one studies double Hurwitz numbers with a view towards polynomial behaviour. This may give an indication of the shape of an ELSV-type formula. In their work Goulden, Jackson and Vakil observe that double Hurwitz numbers are piecewise polynomial in the entries of the two arbitrary ramification profiles and determine the chambers of polynomiality. We note that this polynomiality is not up to a combinatorial factor. This leads them to a concrete conjecture on the shape of the ELSV-type formulae with the condition that all covers are fully ramified over which they prove for genus [math] and genus .
This piecewise polynomial behaviour was further studied in work of Shadrin, Shapiro and Vainshtein, where it was observed that in genus [math] the difference of the polynomials in two adjacent chambers may be expressed in terms of Hurwitz numbers with smaller input data [26]. This was generalised to arbitrary genus by Cavalieri, Johnson and Markwig in [3] using tropical geometry and by Johnson in [21] in terms of the fermionic Fock space formalism.
1.1. (Strictly) monotone double Hurwitz numbers
In recent years it was shown in several instances that (strictly) monotone Hurwitz numbers share many features with their classical counterparts. For example, single monotone Hurwitz numbers satisfy an ELSV-type formula [1], the so-called Chekhov-Eynard-Orantin (CEO) topological recursion [1], and strictly monotone Hurwitz numbers satisfy CEO topological recursion in the so-called orbifold case [7, 9, 23, 6, 22]. Moreover, it was proved in [5, 15] that (strictly) monotone double Hurwitz numbers are related to tropical geometry. More precisely, there is an expression in terms of combinatorial covers which are graphs related to tropical covers but decorated with extra combinatorial data. A common theme in studying (strictly) monotone double Hurwitz numbers is to consider some refinement of the enumeration and obtaining results for this refinement. An important example is the study of recursive behaviour of monotone Hurwitz numbers. A recursion for single monotone Hurwitz numbers was proved in [8, 12], while a recursion for monotone orbifold Hurwitz numbers and monotone double Hurwitz numbers remains an open question. However, it is possible to express monotone orbifold/double Hurwitz numbers as a sum of enumerations and deriving recursions for each summand. This approach was taken in [5] for the monotone orbifold Hurwitz numbers and in [18] for the monotone double Hurwitz numbers, where each summand correspond to certain decorations on the combinatorial covers.
In [14], it was proved that monotone double Hurwitz numbers behave piecewise polynomially with the same chambers of polynomials as the usual double Hurwitz numbers. This polynomial behaviour was further studied by the first author in [15], in terms of the aforementioned combinatorial covers. Using Ehrhart theory, algorithms were developed which compute the polynomials for monotone double Hurwitz numbers. We note that a priori these algorithms compute quasi-polynomials in a chamber structure much finer than necessary. In other words, the polynomial structure of monotone double Hurwitz numbers is not fully visible from this tropical viewpoint. However, it was possible to derive wall-crossing formulae in genus [math].
Motivated by the work in [21], Kramer and the authors studied the piecewise polynomial behaviour of (strictly) monotone double Hurwitz numbers in the fermionic Fock space formalism in [16]. In particular, it was proved that strictly monotone double Hurwitz numbers are piecewise polynomial which was an open question at the time. Moreover, a refinement of the generating series of (strictly) monotone double Hurwitz numbers was introduced, i.e. a larger generating series which specialises to the generating of (strictly) monotone double Hurwitz numbers. It was proved that this refinement admits wall-crossing formulae.
1.2. Results
In [17], the authors derived a new interpretation of monotone and strictly monotone double Hurwitz numbers in terms of tropical covers which are weighted by Gromov-Witten invariants without any additional combinatorial decoration. In this paper, we use this new interpretation and apply the methods developed in [3] to study the wall-crossing behaviour of (strictly) monotone double Hurwitz numbers in arbitrary genus. In a sense, we take an opposite approach to [16]. In [16], the generating series computing (strictly) monotone double Hurwitz numbers was enlarged and wall-crossing formulae were derived for this enlarged series. In this paper, we observe that using this new tropical interpretation, (strictly) monotone double Hurwitz numbers may naturally be written as a sum of smaller invariants, which we call -invariants. These invariants correspond to (ordered) partitions of the number of intermediate simple branch points and can be expressed as vacuum expectations of certain operators in the bosonic Fock space formalism and are thus not just obtained by combinatorial data. Moreover, it was proved in [18, Theorem 5.10] that the generating series of these invariants for elliptic base curves yield quasimodular forms.
In theorem 3.3, we prove that the invariants are piecewise polynomial with the same chambers of polynomiality as the usual double Hurwitz numbers, thus giving a new proof of the piecewise polynomiality of (strictly) monotone double Hurwitz numbers. We further derive wall-crossing formulae for the invariants in theorem 3.6 and a recursion in theorem 5.1.
1.3. Structure of this paper
In section 2, we recall some of the basic facts around Hurwitz theory and tropical geometry. In section 3, we introduce the necessary notation to state two of our main results. Mainly, we state a piecewise polynomiality results in theorem 3.3 andd wall-crossing formulae for the aforementioned invariants. In section 4, we prove those theorems. Finally, we derive a recursion for invariants in section 5.
1.4. Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Hannah Markwig for many helpful correspondences and comments on an earlier draft. The first author gratefully acknowledges financial support as part of the LOEWE research unit ’Uniformized structures in Arithmetic and Geometry’. D. L. is supported by the Max Planck Gesellschaft.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we recall the basic background needed for this work. In particular, we introduce several variants of Hurwitz numbers in subsection 2.1, review some basics of Gromov-Witten theory in subsection 2.2 and recall the tropical correspondence theorems expressing these variants in terms of tropical covers in subsection 2.3. We further fix the notation and .
2.1. Hurwitz numbers
We define monotone and strictly monotone Hurwitz numbers in terms of the symmetric group which we denote by . For a permutation , we denote the partition corresponding to its conjugacy class by .
Definition 2.1**.**
Let be a non-negative integer, with . Let (resp. ) be the tuple of positive entries of (resp. ) and denote . Further, we set . Then we define a factorisation of type to be a tuple , such that
- (1)
; 2. (2)
, , ; 3. (3)
;
Further, we denote with . We call a monotone factorisation if and strictly monotone if . We then define the monotone double Hurwitz number to be the number of monotone factorisations times . Analogously, we define the strictly monotone double Hurwitz number by to be the number of strictly monotone factorisations times .
Furthermore, we call a factorisation of type transitive if
- (4)
is a transitive subgroup of .
Then we define the connected monotone double Hurwitz number and the connected strictly monotone double Hurwitz number as before as the numbers of transitive (strictly) monotone factorisations of type times .
Remark 2.2**.**
By dropping the monotonicity condition on the transpositions in definition 2.1, we obtain so-called double Hurwitz numbers. These numbers are equivalent to the enumeration of branched degree morphisms with ramification profile () over [math] (resp. ) and simple ramification over fixed points of .
2.2. Gromov-Witten invariants with target
We now recall some of the notions of Gromov-Witten theory. A more detailed introduction in the context of tropical covers can be found in [4]. For a more general introduction to the topic, we recommend [27].
We denote by the moduli space of stable maps with marked points which a Deligne-Mumford stack of virtual dimension . It consists of tuples , such that is a connected, projective curve of genus with at worst nodal singularities, are non-singular points on and is a function with . Moreover, may only have a finite automorphism group (respecting markings and singularities). In order to define enumerative invariants, we introduce
- •
The th evaluation morphism is the map obtained by mapping the tuple to .
- •
The th cotangent line bundle is obtained by identifying the fiber of each point with the cotangent space . The first Chern class of th cotangent line bundle is called a psi class which we denote by .
This yields the following definition.
Definition 2.3**.**
Fix and let be non-negative integers, such that . Then the stationary Gromov-Witten invariant is defined by
[TABLE]
where denotes class of a point on .
Similarly, we consider the moduli space of relative stable maps relative to two partitions of and define the relative Gromov-Witten invariants by
[TABLE]
We note that in the following, we add subscripts "" and "" which correspond to connected or not necessarily connected (for simplicity also called disconnected) Gromov-Witten invariants which in turn correspond to considering connected or disconnected stable maps.
2.3. Tropical correspondence theorem
We begin by defining abstract tropical curves.
Definition 2.4**.**
An abstract tropical curve is a connected metric graph with unbounded edges called ends, together with a function associating a genus to each vertex . Let be the set of its vertices. Let and be the set of its internal (or bounded) edges and its set of all edges, respectively. The set of ends is therefore , and all ends are considered to have infinite length. The genus of an abstract tropical curve is , where is the first Betti number of the underlying graph. An isomorphism of a tropical curve is an automorphism of the underlying graph that respects edges’ lengths and vertices’ genera. The combinatorial type of a tropical curve is obtained by disregarding its metric structure.
As a next step, we consider maps between abstract tropical curves which mirror the situation of covers between Riemann surfaces.
Definition 2.5**.**
A tropical cover is a surjective harmonic map between abstract tropical curves as in [2], i.e.:
- i).
Let denote the vertex set of , then we require ;
- ii).
Let denote the edge set of , then we require ;
- iii).
For each edge , denote by its length. We interpret as intervals and , then we require restricted to to be a linear map of slope , that is is given by . We call the weight of . If is a vertex, we have .
- iv).
For a vertex , let . We choose an edge adjacent to . We define the local degree at as
[TABLE]
We require to be independent of the choice of edge adjacent to . We call this fact the balancing or harmonicity condition.
We furthermore introduce the following notions:
- i).
The degree of a tropical cover is the sum over all local degrees of pre-images of any point in . Due to the harmonicity condition, this number is independent of the point in .
- ii).
For any end , we define a partion as the partition of weights of the ends of mapping to . We call the ramification profile above .
The following theorem expresses monotone and strictly monotone double Hurwitz numbers in terms of tropical covers weighted by Gromov-Witten invariants.
Theorem 2.6** ([17]).**
Let be a non-negative integer, and wih .
[TABLE]
where is the set of tropical covers with points fixed on the codomain and an ordered partition of , such that
- i).
The unbounded left (resp. right) pointing ends of have weights given by the partition (resp. ).
- ii).
*The graph has vertices. Let be the set of its vertices. Then we have for . Moreover, let be the corresponding valencies. *
- iii).
We assign an integer as the genus to and the following condition holds true
[TABLE]
- iv).
We have .
- v).
For each vertex , let (resp. ) be the tuple of weights of those edges adjacent to which map to the right-hand (resp. left-hand) of . The multiplicity of is defined to be
[TABLE]
Furthermore, we obtain and by considering only connected source curves.
In the following remark, we discuss the Gromov-Witten invariants appearing in the above vertex multiplicities.
Remark 2.7**.**
It is well-known that
[TABLE]
where is the th Bernoulli number. Furthermore, it was proved in [25] that
[TABLE]
3. Piecewise polynomiality and Wall-crossings
We begin by defining a refinement of monotone and strictly monotone double Hurwitz numbers.
Definition 3.1**.**
Let be a non-negative integer , such that . Furthermore, let be an ordered partition of . Then we define
[TABLE]
Furthermore, let be an unordered partition of . Then we define
[TABLE]
where the first sum is over all ordered partitions which are obtained by some ordering of . Similarly, we define and . We further define their disconnected counterparts by considering disconnected tropical covers and decorate them with .
Remark 3.2**.**
We observe that by definition
[TABLE]
where the first sum is taken over all ordered partition of and the second sum is taken over all unordered partitions of .
We note that these numbers naturally appear as weighted sums of vacuum expectations of products of the operators in the notation of [17].
3.1. Results
In this section, we collect our results about the piecewise polynomial behaviour of and . We first define the resonance arrangement which is the hyperplane arrangement in given by
[TABLE]
for all . The connected components of the complement of the resonance arrangements are called chambers. We also refer to them by chambers.
Theorem 3.3**.**
Let be a non-negative integer, fix the length of and let be an unordered partition of . The function and are polynomials of degree at most in each chamber of the resonance arrangement.
Combining theorem 3.3 and equation 13, we therefore obtain a new proof of the following result.
Corollary 3.4** ([14, 16]).**
For a non-negative integer and a fixed length of , the functions and are piecewise polynomial.
This motivates the following definition.
Definition 3.5**.**
Let be two chambers adjacent along the wall , with being the chamber with . Let be the polynomial expressing in . We define the wall-crossing function by
[TABLE]
We derive the following expression of the wall-crossing function.
Theorem 3.6**.**
Let be a non-negative integer, the fixed length of and an unordered partition of . Then we have
[TABLE]
where (resp. ) is an ordered tuple of length (resp. ) of positive integers with sum (resp. ) and is given by (and analogously for ).
4. Proofs of chamber polynomiality and of wall crossing formulae
In this section, we prove theorem 3.3 and theorem 3.6. We focus on the case of monotone Hurwitz numbers as the other case is completely parallel. To begin with, we introduce a formal set-up for the proofs of both theorems in subsection 4.1. We continue in subsection 4.2 where we prove theorem 3.3. Finally, we prove theorem 3.6 in subsection 4.3. We follow the strategy of [3] which focuses on the case of trivalent graphs, however all results we cite hold for the graphs with higher valency considered in this paper with the same proofs. We also provide a running example for this case of higher valency throughout the proof, which is analogous to example 2.5 in [3] for the trivalent case.
4.1. Formal set-up
Instead of tropical covers, we work with combinatorial covers, where the information given by the cover is encoded as an orientation given on the graph.
Definition 4.1** (Combinatorial cover).**
For fixed , , unordered, a graph is a combinatorial cover of type , if
- (1)
is a connected graph with at most vertices; 2. (2)
has many valent vertices called leaves; the adjacent edges are called ends and are labeled by the weights ; further, all ends are oriented inwards. If , we say it is an in-end, otherwise it is an out-end; 3. (3)
we denote the set of edges which are not edges by ; 4. (4)
there are inner vertices; 5. (5)
we denote the inner vertices by and assign a non-negative integer to which we call the genus of ; we further have ; 6. (6)
after reversing the orientation of the out-ends, does not have sinks or sources; 7. (7)
the internal vertices are ordered compatibly with the partial ordering induced by the directions of the edges; 8. (8)
we have , where is the first Betti number of ; 9. (9)
every internal edge of the graph is equipped with a weight . The weights satisfy the balancing condition a each inner vertex: the sum of all weights of incoming edges equals the sum of the weights of outgoing edges.
The notation indicates that graph comes with directed edges and with a compatible vertex ordering .
Then remark 5.3 translates to
[TABLE]
where the second sum is over all combinatorial covers of type and we have
[TABLE]
with
[TABLE]
where is the tuple of weights of in-coming edges and the tuple of weights of outgoing edges at . Analogously, one obtains , and their disconnected counterparts.
Moreover, for an unordered partition , we have
[TABLE]
where the second sum is over all combinatorial covers of type .
Definition 4.2**.**
Given and , an graph (or simply when there is no risk of confusion) is a connected, genus combinatorial cover, where we forget the direction of the edges and the vertex ordering, such that the ends are labeled .
4.1.1. Hyperplane arrangements
We view an graph as a one-dimensional cell complex. The differential , sending a directed edge to the difference of its head and tail vertices, yields the following short exact sequence
[TABLE]
We decompose into ends and internal vertices. Then we have a vector of the form when .
Definition 4.3**.**
We define the space of flows to be
[TABLE]
Inside the space of flows, we define a hyperplane arrangement
[TABLE]
given by the restriction of the coordinate hyperplanes corresponding to the internal edges in . The defining polynomial for this hyperplane arrangement is
[TABLE]
where are the coordinate functions on restricted to .
We note that often it is useful to fix a reference orientation on a given graph. The following lemma shows that this corresponds to fixing a bounded chamber in the hyperplane arrangement.
Lemma 4.4** ([3, Lemma 2.13, Corollary 2.14]).**
The bounded chambers of correspond to orientations of with no directed cycles. Moreover, given an graph , the bounded chambers of are in bijection with directed graphs projecting to after forgetting the orientations of the edges that come from a combinatorial cover (defined in 4.1). ∎
The following remark indicates an interesting structural result regarding the vertex contributions.
Remark 4.5**.**
Recall that the contribution of each vertex is given by
[TABLE]
where are the incoming and are the outgoing edge weights. Moreover, by [24, Theorem 2] the following identity holds
[TABLE]
Thus we obtain
[TABLE]
We recall that and are even power series. Therefore is a polynomial in the adjacent edge weights and all appearing monomials are of even degree. We denote this polynomial by . This polynomial is independent of the flow of the respective branching graph.
Definition 4.6**.**
Let be an graph. We denote by the contribution to of all combinatorial covers having underlying graph , where is obtained by
[TABLE]
where runs over all inner vertices, i.e. .
For a given graph , we call chambers the chambers of in the flow space . Recall that all points in the same -chamber have edge weights with the same sign (i.e. their edges have the same orientation). Crossing a wall towards a different chamber in a certain direction means moving in the flow space along the direction (say, in the chamber we have ), where is the coordinate that represents the weight of some edge in the decomposition . After hitting the wall defined by , the adjacent chamber has all coordinates with same sign as in the chamber , for , and instead . Each point of this chamber corresponds therefore to an oriented graph in which the edge corresponding to has opposite orientation with respect to the one in chamber .
For an chamber , let denote the directed -graph with the edge directions corresponding to the chamber . We use (or ), to denote the number of all possible orderings of the vertices of from left to right (recall that the branch points are fixed over the base).
Lemma 4.7**.**
[3]** For an -chamber , we have that is zero if and only if is unbounded.
Roughly speaking, the reason for the above statement is that a chamber can be unbounded if and only if the graphs contain an oriented loop which makes it impossible to order the vertices over the base. As will appear as multiplicity in our formula, we can immediately discard all unbounded chambers, as their contribution vanishes completely.
We use to denote the set of -chambers of . Clearly, the sign of
[TABLE]
alternates on adjacent chambers (since we swap the direction of one edge, as explained above): we indicate with the sign of on the chamber , where is the number of negative coordinates in the chamber .
For integer values of , the space of flows has an affine lattice, coming from the integral structure of . We denote this lattice by
[TABLE]
This notation allows a convenient interpretation of in terms of the hyperplane arrangement . Choices of the weights of the edges – i.e. the choice of a flow on - correspond to lattice points in . We have that
[TABLE]
where is an even polynomial in the edge weights by remark 4.5, and to pass from the first to the second line use that the product of all the edge weights of a flow is the absolute value of computed at which if is simply .
Example 4.8**.**
We illustrate the introduced notions for the combinatorial cover in the top of figure 1, where is indicated in the left picture, is indicated by the directed edges, and .
In the middle of figure 1, two flow spaces for are given. On the left, we have and . On the right, we have crossed the wall .
We further have for and
[TABLE]
for .
4.2. Polynomials and walls
We begin with the proof of theorem 3.3. We fix an graph with reference orientation given by the flow . We first observe that
[TABLE]
is a polynomial of degree , as is a polynomial of degree and is a polynomial of degree . Considering the Euler characteristic of we obtain
[TABLE]
and therefore
[TABLE]
Recalling and the fact that , it is easily seen that the right hand side maximizes for . Thus, we have
[TABLE]
Similar to [3, Remark 2.11], we have that is dimensional.
Moreover, it is well-known that summing a polynomial of degree over the lattice points in a dimensional integral polytope of fixed topology is a polynomial of degree in the numbers defining the boundary of the polytope. We further observe that each vertex is given by an integer vector because the incidence matrix of a directed graph is totally unimodular.
Combining these facts, it follows that is a polynomial in of degree as long as varying does not change the topology of which is maximal for and .
Thus is piecewise polynomial of maximal degree . We now determine the areas in which is polynomial. More precisely, we prove that is polynomial in each top-dimensional component in the complement of a hyperplane arrangement. We further compute those hyperplanes.
We note that the hyperplane arrangement given by is not always given by hyperplanes which only intersect transversally. Morally, the shape of the polynomial expressing should only change when the topology of changes. When translating generic hyperplane arrangements the topology changes when one passes through a non-transversality. However, in our situation, there can be nontransversalities which appear for each value of . Nonetheless, it is still true that the topology changes once one passes through additional nontransversalities. We call those nontransversalities which appear for any value good transversalities. The following definition is a classification of these.
Definition 4.9**.**
Suppose a set of hyperplanes (equivalently, edges in ) in intersect in codimension . We call this intersection good if there is a set of vertices in so that is precisely the set of edges incident to vertices in .
Furthermore, we define the discriminant locus the set of values of so that for some directed graph the hyperplane arrangement has a nontransverse intersection that is not good. The discriminant is a union of hyperplanes which we call the discriminant arrangement. We call these hyperplanes walls and the chambers defined by the arrangement chambers.
The chambers are the chambers of polynomiality of . Now, we establish that the walls correspond to the resonance arrangements
[TABLE]
for . We begin with the following definition.
Definition 4.10**.**
A simple cut of a graph is a minimal set of edges that disconnects the ends of : There are two ends of such that every path between them contains an edge of and this is true of no proper subset of .
For an graph, a flow in is disconnected if for some simple cut the flow on each edge of is zero.
This yields the following lemma.
Lemma 4.11** ([3, Lemma 3.8]).**
The discriminant arrangement is given by the set of such that for some graph , the space admits a disconnected flow.
Now, let admit a disconnected flow and let be the corresponding simple cut. Then it follows by the balancing condition that the sum of weights of ends belonging to a connected component of is [math]. Thus, the walls of the discriminant arrangement are a subset of the hyperplanes in the resonance arrangement. The arrangements are equal since it is easy to construct a graph , with some edge , such that has two components, one containing the ends of and the other containing the ends of . Thus is polynomial in each chamber of the resonance arrangement.
4.3. Wall-crossing
In this section, we prove theorem 3.6. We first discuss the combinatorics of cutting an graph into several smaller graphs.
Definition 4.12**.**
Let a directed graph and a subset of the edges of . We consider the graph whose edges are the connected components of and whose vertices are . We call this graph the contraction of with respect to and denote it by .
We fix a directed graph and let some subset. Then the set of cuts of consists of those subset of the edges of , such that or
- (1)
is disconnected; 2. (2)
the ends of lie on exactly two components of , one containing all ends indexed by , the other containing all ends indexed by ; 3. (3)
the directed graph is acyclic and has the component containing as the initial vertex and the component containing as the final vertex.
Let be the number of components of . Then we define the rank of by
[TABLE]
By the discussion in [3, Section 6], we have
[TABLE]
where and are the numbers of inner vertices of the inner components of .
Definition 4.13**.**
Let be an graph and . We call a thin cut, if if all edges in are either adjacent to the inital component containing or the component containg . Furthermore, for a thin cut , we denote by the set of all cuts which contain .
By [3, Lemma 8.2], we have
[TABLE]
Remark 4.14**.**
We note that there is a sign mistake in the formulation of [3, Lemma 8.2] which occurs in the proof of [3, Lemma 8.4].
Combining equation 37 and equation 38, we obtain
[TABLE]
We now observe that each thin cut divides into three parts: the initial component , an intermediate part and a final component . Moreover, the intermediate part may be disconnected. Thus, we observe that contributes to , to and to , and are some partitions with , . Finally, we observe that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
which cancels with the factor in equation 40. This completes the proof of theorem 3.6.
5. A refined recursion for (strictly) monotone double Hurwitz numbers
In this section, we derive recursive formulae for and . We then generalise these results for mixed usual/monotone/strictly monotone Hurwitz numbers.
Theorem 5.1**.**
Let and be partitions of some positive integer . Moroever, let be a non-negative integer. Furthermore, we fix an ordered partition with and denote . Then we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where in both formulas, the first sum is over all
- (1)
subsets , 2. (2)
positive integers , 3. (3)
decompositions of , and into partitions , and , where the must be non-empty, 4. (4)
partitions of , where must be non-empty, 5. (5)
non-negative integers with .
up to order.
Proof.
This result is a consequence of remark 5.3. We focus on the case of monotone Hurwitz numbers, as the argument for strictly monotone Hurwitz numbers is the same up to a sign. The idea is to consider all covers contributing to and removing the last inner vertex which we denote by . Let be such a cover. When we remove the last inner vertex (and thus the adjacent ends which are indexed by ), the cover decomposes in possibly many disconnected components. Let be their number. Each such component yields again a tropical cover mapping to some subset . Each cover is contained in some non-negative integer , a subpartition of , a partition of and a subpartition of . We note that can be decomposed into a subpartition of which we denote by and some partition given by the weights of the edges adjacent to the removed vertex and contained in the th component, i.e. we have . This data satisfies conditions (1)–(5) stated in the theorem. The first four conditions are immediate. In order to observe the fifth condition, we consider the Euler characteristics of the graphs and . The Euler characteristic of is given by
[TABLE]
and the Euler charcteristic of is given by
[TABLE]
However, we see that
[TABLE]
since we remove a single vertex and many ends and leaves attached to it, i.e. vertices and edges. Moreover, all incoming edges of the removed vertices obtain an additional vertex which yields many vertices. By combining equation 46, equation 47 and equation 48, we obtain
[TABLE]
We observe that and therefore obtain
[TABLE]
However, we know that and thus . Thus, we obtain
[TABLE]
which is the last condition.
On the other hand, starting with data satisfying these conditions, one can consider tropical covers , where . We can then glue the s to a cover contributing to : first, we choose subsets of with . There are such choices. Then the vertices of map to the points in , while maintaining the order of the images of the vertices in . We then join the edges with weights corresponding to the partitions to a single vertex , such that these edges are incoming edges and maps to . Moreover, we attach outgoing edges to which are ends with weights in bijection to the entries of . This way, we obtain a cover . Let be the weight of the graphs and . Then we observe that
[TABLE]
where we note that contributes to . This completes the proof. ∎
We want now to generalise the statement above to mixed Hurwitz numbers. The following definition expresses mixed -strictly monotone/ -monotone/ -usual double Hurwitz numbers in terms of tropical covers weighted by Gromov-Witten invariants.
Definition 5.2**.**
Let be a non-negative integer, and wih , , let and be two integers such that . Let be a partition of and let be a partition of , set for and finally set . We are ready to define the -slice of the mixed -strictly monotone/ -monotone/ -usual double Hurwitz numbers
[TABLE]
where is the set of tropical covers with points fixed on the codomain and an ordered partition of , such that
- i).
The unbounded left (resp. right) pointing ends of have weights given by the partition (resp. ).
- ii).
The graph has vertices. Let be the set of its vertices. Then we have for . Moreover, let be the corresponding valencies.
- iii).
We assign an integer as the genus to and the following condition holds true
[TABLE]
- iv).
We have .
- v).
For each vertex , let (resp. ) be the tuple of weights of those edges adjacent to which map to the right-hand (resp. left-hand) of . The multiplicity of is defined to be
[TABLE]
Note that the above always simplify to either one (in most of the cases) or two (only in case the two half-edges directed towards the same end have equal weights). Furthermore, we define by considering only connected source curves.
Remark 5.3**.**
It is a straightforward generalisation of theorem in [17] the fact that these numbers are the -slices of mixed usual/monotone/strictly-monotone Hurwitz numbers, meaning that if we define
[TABLE]
then enumerates all weighted ramified covers of degree of the Riemann sphere by genus compact surfaces where the ramification profiles over zero and infinity are given by and , respectively, and all other ramifications are simple (and therefore can be represented as transpositions with ), in such a way that the first simple ramifications satisfy the strictly monotone condition, the following satisfy the weakly monotone condition, and the remaining are usual simple ramifications (and hence do not satisfy any additional requirement):
- (1)
for , 2. (2)
for .
With the notations above, we are going to generalise theorem 5.1 by cutting one vertex of the tropical covers. However, there are now three different types of vertices, as opposed to one in 5.1: the strictly monotone vertices, the weakly monotone vertices, and the usual vertices. We therefore obtain three different recursions, depending on which type of vertex we are cutting. Note that the first and the second type of vertex differ just by a sign factor in their weights, whereas the third type is extremely simple as its genus is zero and its cardinality must be equal to three. It is moreover possible to have first and second type of vertices which happen to be usual vertices ( this happens if and only if they come from parts of equal to one in the first parts): we still treat them according to their general nature, as the formula for their weight in that case naturally specialises to the weight of usual vertices.
Corollary 5.4**.**
Let and be partitions of some positive integer , let be a non-negative integers, let be a partition with , for all , and for a partition denote . Then we have the following three recursions:
- i).
Cutting along a strictly monotone vertex.**
[TABLE] 2. ii).
Cutting along a weakly monotone vertex.**
[TABLE] 3. iii).
Cutting along a usual vertex.**
[TABLE]
where in all three formulas, the first sum is over all
- (1)
subsets , 2. (2)
positive integers (smaller or equal than in the third recursion), 3. (3)
decompositions of , and into partitions where the must be non-empty, 4. (4)
partitions of , where must be non-empty, 5. (5)
non-negative integers with , 6. (6)
in the third case we require .
up to order, and moreover
- i).
when cutting over a strictly monotone vertex we have
[TABLE] 2. ii).
when cutting over a weakly monotone vertex we have
[TABLE] 3. iii).
when cutting over a usual vertex we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
The proof is a straightforward generalisation of the one of theorem 5.1. The main difference is that we need to keep track of the partitions of and when cutting, and eliminate the right cut vertex from the summations over . The cut vertex in third recursion has genus zero and valency exactly three: the recursion has trivial residue Gromov-Witten invariants and gets bounded by two. The extra signs appear only in the first recursion, when we cut a vertex of strict monotone type. This concludes the proof of the corollary. ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Alexandrov, A., Lewanski, D., and Shadrin, S. Ramifications of Hurwitz theory, KP integrability and quantum curves. Journal of High Energy Physics 2016 , 5 (2016), 124.
- 2[2] Amini, O., Baker, M., Brugallé, E., and Rabinoff, J. Lifting harmonic morphisms I: metrized complexes and Berkovich skeleta. Research in the Mathematical Sciences 2 , 1 (2015), 7.
- 3[3] Cavalieri, R., Johnson, P., and Markwig, H. Wall crossings for double Hurwitz numbers. Adv. Math. 228 , 4 (2011), 1894–1937.
- 4[4] Cavalieri, R., Johnson, P., Markwig, H., and Ranganathan, D. A graphical interface for the Gromov-Witten theory of curves. Algebraic Geometry: Salt Lake City 2015: 2015 Summer Research Institute, July 13-31, 2015, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 97 (2018), 139.
- 5[5] Do, N., and Karev, M. Monotone orbifold Hurwitz numbers. Journal of Mathematical Sciences 226 , 5 (2017), 568–587.
- 6[6] Do, N., and Manescu, D. Quantum curves for the enumeration of ribbon graphs and hypermaps. ar Xiv preprint ar Xiv:1312.6869 (2013).
- 7[7] Dumitrescu, O., Mulase, M., Safnuk, B., and Sorkin, A. The spectral curve of the Eynard-Orantin recursion via the Laplace transform. Contemp. Math 593 (2013), 263–315.
- 8[8] Dunin-Barkowski, P., Kramer, R., Popolitov, A., and Shadrin, S. Cut-and-join equation for monotone Hurwitz numbers revisited. Journal of Geometry and Physics 137 (2019), 1–6.
