What do we see when we look at networks
Tommaso Venturini, Mathieu Jacomy, Pablo Jensen

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the use of network visualizations in sciences, analyzing their foundations, limitations, and providing guidance on interpreting their visual features effectively.
Contribution
It offers a conceptual and mathematical analysis of force-directed layouts and practical guidance for making network visualizations more interpretable.
Findings
Force-directed layouts have specific interpretative limitations.
Visual features of networks can be systematically analyzed and understood.
Guidelines improve the readability and interpretability of network visualizations.
Abstract
It is an increasingly common practice in several natural and social sciences to rely on network visualisations both as heuristic tools to get a first overview of relational datasets and as a way to offer an illustration of network analysis findings. Such practice has been around long enough to prove that scholars find it useful to project networks on a space and to observe their visual appearance as a proxy for their topological features. Yet this practice remains largely based on intuition and no investigation has been carried out on to render explicit the foundations and limits of this type of exploration. This paper provides such analysis, by conceptually and mathematically deconstructing the functioning of force-directed layouts and by providing a step-by-step guidance on how to make networks readable and interpret their visual features.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques · Data Visualization and Analytics · Plant and animal studies
