# Lower bounds for testing complete positivity and quantum separability

**Authors:** Costin B\u{a}descu, Ryan O'Donnell

arXiv: 1905.01542 · 2019-09-11

## TL;DR

This paper establishes lower bounds on the number of copies or samples needed to test quantum separability and complete positivity, revealing fundamental complexity limits in quantum and classical property testing.

## Contribution

It provides the first lower bounds for testing quantum separability and classical complete positivity, highlighting the inherent difficulty of these problems.

## Key findings

- Testing quantum separability requires at least ^2/\u03b5^2 copies.
- Deciding complete positivity in distributions needs /^2 samples.
- Learning a completely positive distribution demands ^2/^2 samples.

## Abstract

In this work we are interested the problem of testing quantum entanglement. More specifically, we study the separability problem in quantum property testing, where one is given $n$ copies of an unknown mixed quantum state $\varrho$ on $\mathbb{C}^d \otimes \mathbb{C}^d$, and one wants to test whether $\varrho$ is separable or $\epsilon$-far from all separable states in trace distance. We prove that $n = \Omega(d^2/\epsilon^2)$ copies are necessary to test separability, assuming $\epsilon$ is not too small, viz.\ $\epsilon = \Omega(1/\sqrt{d})$.   We also study completely positive distributions on the grid $[d] \times [d]$, as a classical analogue of separable states. We analogously prove that $\Omega(d/\epsilon^2)$ samples from an unknown distribution $p$ are necessary to decide whether $p$ is completely positive or $\epsilon$-far from all completely positive distributions in total variation distance. Towards showing that the true complexity may in fact be higher, we also show that learning an unknown completely positive distribution on $[d] \times [d]$ requires $\Omega(d^2/\epsilon^2)$ samples.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.01542/full.md

## References

18 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.01542/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.01542