Global offensive $k$-alliances in digraphs

TL;DR

This paper introduces the concept of global offensive $k$-alliances in digraphs, explores their computational complexity, and establishes bounds and relationships with domination numbers for various classes of digraphs.

Contribution

It initiates the study of global offensive $k$-alliances in digraphs, proving NP-hardness, providing bounds, and analyzing their relation to domination numbers.

Findings

Finding the problem is NP-hard for all relevant $k$ values.

Characterization of digraphs attaining bounds on $ ext{γ}_k^o(D)$.

Equality of $ ext{γ}_1^o(D)$ and domination number for certain digraph families.

Abstract

In this paper, we initiate the study of global offensive $k$-alliances in digraphs. Given a digraph $D=(V(D),A(D))$, a global offensive $k$-alliance in a digraph $D$ is a subset $S\subseteq V(D)$ such that every vertex outside of $S$ has at least one in-neighbor from $S$ and also at least $k$ more in-neighbors from $S$ than from outside of $S$, by assuming $k$ is an integer lying between two minus the maximum in-degree of $D$ and the maximum in-degree of $D$. The global offensive $k$-alliance number $\gamma_{k}^{o}(D)$ is the minimum cardinality among all global offensive $k$-alliances in $D$. In this article we begin the study of the global offensive $k$-alliance number of digraphs. For instance, we prove that finding the global offensive $k$-alliance number of digraphs $D$ is an NP-hard problem for any value $k\in \{2-\Delta^-(D),\dots,\Delta^-(D)\}$ and that it remains NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite digraphs when we consider the non-negative values of $k$ given in the interval above. Based on these facts, lower bounds on $\gamma_{k}^{o}(D)$ with characterizations of all digraphs attaining the bounds are given in this work. We also bound this parameter for bipartite digraphs from above. For the particular case $k=1$, an immediate result from the definition shows that $\gamma(D)\leq \gamma_{1}^{o}(D)$ for all digraphs $D$, in which $\gamma(D)$ stands for the domination number of $D$. We show that these two digraph parameters are the same for some infinite families of digraphs like rooted trees and contrafunctional digraphs. Moreover, we show that the difference between $\gamma_{1}^{o}(D)$ and $\gamma(D)$ can be arbitrary large for directed trees and connected functional digraphs.