A low-mass triple system with a wide L/T transition brown dwarf component: NLTT 51469AB/SDSS 2131-0119
B. Gauza, V. J. S. B\'ejar, A. P\'erez-Garrido, N. Lodieu, R. Rebolo,, M. R. Zapatero Osorio, B. Pantoja, S. Velasco, and J. S. Jenkins

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery of a wide low-mass triple system with an L/T transition brown dwarf companion, providing insights into the system's properties, age, and kinematics, and contributing to understanding of substellar objects in multiple systems.
Contribution
The study identifies and characterizes a unique low-mass triple system with a wide L/T transition brown dwarf, combining spectroscopy, astrometry, and kinematic analysis.
Findings
The system is a wide triple with a brown dwarf at the L9 spectral type.
The system is older than 1 Gyr and likely part of the thin disk population.
The primary is an M3$ extpm$1 dwarf, with a close M6 companion.
Abstract
We demonstrate that the previously identified L/T transition brown dwarf SDSS J213154.43-011939.3 (SDSS 2131-0119) is a widely separated (82.3'', 3830 au) common proper motion companion to the low-mass star NLTT 51469, which we reveal to be a close binary itself, separated by 0.64''0.01'' (30 au). We find the proper motion of SDSS 2131-0119 of , mas/yr consistent with the proper motion of the primary provided by Gaia DR2: , mas/yr. Based on optical and near-infrared spectroscopy we classify NLTT 51469A as a M31 dwarf, estimate photometrically the spectral type of its close companion NLTT 51469B at M6 and confirm the spectral type of the brown dwarf to be L91. Using radial velocity, proper motion and parallax we derived the …
| Instr., band | mag(A) | mag(B) | (″) | (deg) | Epoch (MJD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FastCam | 11.25 0.30 | 14.55 0.30 | 0.625 0.009 | 57.28 0.76 | 57708 |
| Clio-2 | 9.98 0.06 | 12.21 0.06 | 0.628 0.012 | 56.59 0.42 | 58240 |
| NACO | 9.975 0.031 | 12.245 0.031 | 0.641 0.003a | 55.95 0.16a | 58415 |
| NACO | 9.399 0.023 | 11.751 0.023 | 0.638 0.003a | 56.15 0.14a | 58415 |
| NACO | 9.163 0.025 | 11.513 0.025 | 0.638 0.003 | 55.92 0.13 | 58415 |
| Method | Ref. | d (pc) | / |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs. SpT | F15 | 38 (+7, -11) | 0.94 |
| vs. SpT | F15 | 39 (+7, -11) | 0.83 |
| vs. SpT | F15 | 41 (+6, -12) | 0.61 |
| vs. SpT | F15 | 40 (+14, -11) | 0.52 |
| vs. SpT | F15 | 46 (+14, -11) | 0.05 |
| vs. SpT | D12 | 33 (+12, -8) | 1.34 |
| vs. SpT | D12 | 44 (+15, -11) | 0.20 |
| Mean | 40.1 10.7 | 0.64 |
| Astrometry | NLTT 51469 | SDSS 2131-0119 |
|---|---|---|
| R.A. (J2000) | 21h31m59s.603 | 21h31m54s.391 |
| Decl. (J2000) | 01°20′06554 | 01°19′40511 |
| 2MASS ID | J213159.66-012003.9 | J213154.44-011937.4 |
| Separation (arcsec)a | 82.27 0.02 | |
| Separation (AU) | 3834 100 | |
| Position angle (deg)a | 288.4 0.1 | |
| (mas yr-1) | 106 5 | 100 20 |
| (mas yr-1) | 235 5 | 230 20 |
| (mas yr-1)b | 95.49 0.96 | … |
| (mas yr-1)b | 239.38 0.96 | … |
| Parallax (mas)b | 21.45 0.61 | … |
| Estimated (pc) | ||
| Parallactic (pc) | … | |
| (km s-1)c | … | |
| … | ||
| U (km s-1) | 7.12 1.61 | … |
| V (km s-1) | 82.56 2.12 | … |
| W (km s-1) | 30.16 1.80 | … |
| Photometry (mag) | ||
| … | ||
| … | ||
| … | ||
| … | ||
| Sloan | … | |
| Sloan | … | |
| Sloan | 22.68 | |
| Sloan | ||
| 2MASS | ||
| 2MASS | ||
| 2MASS | ||
| VHS | 10.88 | |
| VHS | 11.10 | |
| VHS | 10.10 | |
| WISE W1 | ||
| WISE W2 | ||
| WISE W3 | … | |
| WISE W4 | … | |
| Spectral Classification | ||
| Optical | M3.5 0.5 | L9.0 1.0 |
| Near-IR | M3.0 1.0 | L9.0 0.5 d |
| Adopted spectral type | M3.0 1.0 | L9.0 1.0 |
| Physical Properties | ||
| Age (Gyr) | 1 – 10 | |
| (K) | 1400–1650 | |
| Mass () | 0.05–0.07 | |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
A low-mass triple system
with a wide L/T transition brown dwarf component: NLTT 51469AB/SDSS 21310119
B. Gauza,1,2 V. J. S. Béjar,2,3 A. Pérez-Garrido,4 N. Lodieu,2,3 R. Rebolo,2,3,5 M. R. Zapatero Osorio,6 B. Pantoja,1 S. Velasco2,3 and J. S. Jenkins1
1Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile, Camino el Observatorio 1515, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile, Casilla 36-D
2Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC), Calle Vía Láctea s/n, E-38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
3Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
4Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Campus Muralla del Mar, Cartagena, Murcia E-30202 Spain
5Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CSIC, Spain
6Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), Ctra. Ajalvir km 4, 28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain E-mail: [email protected] on observations made with the Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC), installed in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, in the island of La Palma (program GTC27-13B).
(Accepted 2019 April 30. Received 2019 March 21; in original form 2018 October 4)
Abstract
We demonstrate that the previously identified L/T transition brown dwarf SDSS J213154.43011939.3 (SDSS 21310119) is a widely separated (823, 3830 au) common proper motion companion to the low-mass star NLTT 51469, which we reveal to be a close binary itself, separated by 064 001 (30 au). We find the proper motion of SDSS 21310119 of = 100 20 mas/yr and = 230 20 mas/yr consistent with the proper motion of the primary provided by Gaia DR2: = 95.49 0.96 mas/yr and = 239.38 0.96 mas/yr. Based on optical and near-infrared spectroscopy we classify the primary NLTT 51469A as a M3 1 dwarf, estimate photometrically the spectral type of its close companion NLTT 51469B at M6 and confirm the spectral type of the brown dwarf to be L9 1. Using radial velocity, proper motion and parallax we derived the UVW Galactic space velocities of NLTT 51469A, showing that the system does not belong to any known young stellar moving group. The high , velocities, lack of a 670.8 nm Li i absorption line, and absence of H emission, detected X-rays or UV excess, indicate that the system is likely a member of the thin disk population and is older than 1 Gyr. For the parallactic distance of 46.61.6 pc from Gaia DR2 we determined luminosities of and dex of the M3 and L9, respectively. Considering the spectrophotometric estimation which yields a slightly lower distance of pc the obtained luminosities are and dex. We also estimated their effective temperatures and masses, and obtained 3410 K and 0.42 0.02 for the primary, and 1400–1650 K and 0.05–0.07 for the wide companion. For the M6 component we estimated = 2850 200 K and = 0.10 .
keywords:
stars: low-mass – brown dwarfs – proper motions – stars: individual: NLTT 51469
††pubyear: 2019††pagerange: A low-mass triple system with a wide L/T transition brown dwarf component: NLTT 51469AB/SDSS 21310119–A low-mass triple system with a wide L/T transition brown dwarf component: NLTT 51469AB/SDSS 21310119
1 Introduction
Brown dwarfs are objects that have insufficient mass to sustain stable nuclear fusion in their interiors. After they are formed they evolve getting fainter and cooler. The emergent spectra of brown dwarfs were found so different from that of the latest type M dwarf stars that the establishment of two new spectral types, L and T (Kirkpatrick et al., 1999; Burgasser et al., 2006a), was indispensable to properly classify them. The L-type class encompasses the least massive stars and most massive brown dwarfs and spans effective temperatures (s) of approximately 2500 to 1300 K (e.g., Kirkpatrick et al., 1999; Kirkpatrick, 2005). The T-type class includes solely brown dwarfs with temperatures below 1400 K and down to 500–700 K (e.g., Golimowski et al., 2004; Burgasser et al., 2006b; Burgasser et al., 2006a; Burningham et al., 2008; Leggett et al., 2009). Most recently, searches using the space based Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE; Wright et al. 2010) data revealed a population of even lower objects from approximately 500–700 K down to about 250 K, which have been classified as Y dwarfs (e.g. Cushing et al., 2011; Kirkpatrick et al., 2012; Luhman, 2014; Leggett et al., 2017).
The L to T-type transition undergoes a dramatic change in near-infrared (near-IR) colour, which becomes bluer by about two magnitudes as part of a major change in spectral morphology. This occurs over a narrow range in temperature 200–300 K (e.g., Golimowski et al., 2004). This dynamic phenomenon is still not entirely reproduced and matched by theoretical models, nevertheless the general description of the L/T transition is thought to be fairly well understood for high-gravity atmospheres. It is physically characterised by the break up and clearing of the condensates clouds and a sudden sedimentation of condensed species below the photosphere when the local temperature is 1,500 K, and by the appearance of methane absorption in the 1.0–2.5 m region (Allard et al., 1997, 2001; Chabrier et al., 2000; Ackerman & Marley, 2001; Burrows et al., 2006; Saumon & Marley, 2008).
Since the discoveries of the first unambiguous brown dwarfs in the mid 1990s (Rebolo et al., 1995; Nakajima et al., 1995) large area imaging surveys in optical and near-infrared wavelengths like, among others, DENIS (Epchtein et al., 1994), 2MASS (Skrutskie et al., 2006), SDSS (York et al., 2000; Abazajian et al., 2003) and more recently UKIDSS (Lawrence et al., 2007), WISE (Wright et al., 2010) and Pan-STARRS (Kaiser et al., 2002) enabled significant growth in the population of known brown dwarfs with the current number being around 2000 objects (Delfosse et al., 1997; Kirkpatrick, 2005; Kirkpatrick et al., 2011; Scholz et al., 2012; Deacon et al., 2014; Robert et al., 2016; Smart et al., 2017). However, a great majority of these are single objects and only a small fraction are found to be components in binary or multiple systems (e.g., Faherty et al., 2010; Deacon et al., 2014; Baron et al., 2015; Scholz, 2016).
Ultracool companions to stars are of interest because both components share the same age, metallicity and distance, which are easier to determine for the brighter primary. Substellar objects with well constrained age and metallicity are valuable reference points for calibrating evolutionary and atmospheric models (e.g., Pinfield et al., 2006; Faherty et al., 2010; Jenkins et al., 2012; Gomes et al., 2013; Marocco et al., 2017). Widely separated substellar companions are particularly useful for characterisation because they can be directly observed using seeing-limited instruments.
In this paper we present a nearby, common proper motion triple system identified in our search for ultracool companions to stars using the VISTA Hemisphere Survey data. We describe the search and identification methods in Section 2. Section 3 contains the description of follow-up observations aimed at confirming the companionship and characterisation of the objects. Next, we determine the spectral types of the components in Section 4 and demonstrate the binarity of the NLTT 51469 star in Section 5. In Section 6 we compare the distance measured by Gaia to the spectrophotometric distance obtained for the primary and the L9 companion. Section 7 contains a discussion on the probability of chance alignment of the two wide components. In Section 8 we determine the physical properties of the objects, including radial velocity, galactic kinematics and constraint on the age of the system, luminosities, masses and temperatures of the individual components. Conclusions are future prospects are presented in Section 9.
2 Search and identification
The VISTA Hemisphere Survey (VHS; Emerson et al. 2004) is an ongoing imaging survey for which one of the main goals is the detection of very low-mass stars and substellar objects. The VHS will map the entire southern hemisphere of the sky (20,000 deg2), with the exception of the areas within the VISTA Kilo-Degree Infrared Galaxy Survey (VIKING) and the Variables in the Via Lactea (VVV) survey. Observations covering an area of 10,000 deg2 are carried out in two near-IR bands, and , 5000 deg2 in and another 5000 deg2 in , reaching a median 5 point source detection limits of = 20.2 and = 18.1 mag (McMahon et al., 2013). The VHS catalog provides astrometry and photometry in the , bands, and , bands when available. The VISTA photometric system is calibrated using the magnitudes of color-selected 2MASS stars converted onto the VISTA system using color equations, including terms to account for interstellar reddening111http://casu.ast.cam.ac.uk/surveys-projects/vista/technical/photometric-properties. Photometric calibrations are determined to an accuracy of 1-2%. The astrometric solution for VHS observations is computed by the automatic pipeline of the survey, using point sources from the 2MASS catalog. The world coordinate system of VISTA images is calibrated to 0.1–0.2 arcsec accuracy.
As of the early data releases from VHS prior to March 2013 which covered about 8500 deg2 we built a catalog of high proper motion objects in the southern hemisphere, with motions greater than 0.15–0.20 arcsec per year. We combined VHS catalog measurements (astrometry and YJHK photometry) with 2MASS point source catalogue measurements (as a reference epoch) to identify moving objects in the sky areas overlapping with VHS. The time baseline between the two surveys (10 years) allow to measure proper motions with precision of 10 mas/yr or better. Our search was restricted to sources with 17.5 mag, and fainter than = 11 mag to exclude objects affected by saturation from the VHS database. We also cross-matched VHS sources with WISE All-Sky and USNO-B1.0 catalogs to get mid-infrared and optical photometry information and to filter out contaminants based on mid-infrared and optical constraints where available.
In the cross correlation of VHS and 2MASS catalogs we have found 50382 objects with = 11–17.5 mag range and proper motions of 150 mas/yr taking into account the baseline of 10–12 years between these two surveys. Most of these high proper motion objects are relatively nearby M dwarfs with estimated photometric distances within 100 pc. The general catalogue is currently being developed and prepared for publication (A. Pérez-Garrido et al. 2019, in preparation). Among this list, we have searched for objects co-moving with stars from the revised version of the New Luyten Catalogue of Stars With Proper Motions Larger than Two Tenths of an Arcsecond (NLTT; Gould & Salim 2003; Salim & Gould 2003). We required proper motions to be consistent within 50 mas/yr in both right ascension and declination to identify proper motion pairs. This corresponds to a factor of 2.5–3 times larger than the quoted 1 astrometric error of the surveys, which improves the scope for identifying moving objects fainter than the 2MASS completeness limits. The cross-match was limited to angular separations of 20 arcmin radius.
From the more than a hundred potential binaries and multiples we build a sample of candidate systems containing one or more components with near- and mid-IR photometric colors consistent with mid-M and later spectral types ( 0.8, 0.5, 2 1.5, 12 0.5). Next, we verified each selected system, by checking for the consistency in distance modulus of its candidate components, estimated roughly from the apparent -band brightness and the expected spectral type based on photometric colors. The color-spectral type and color-absolute magnitude relations were adopted from Chiu et al. (2006); Kirkpatrick et al. (2011) and Dupuy & Liu (2012).
One of the identified pairs was the star NLTT 51469 and the brown dwarf SDSS J213154.43-011939.3 with on-sky separation of 82.3 arcsec. In the VHS-2MASS cross-match, we obtained proper motions of , = 82 16, 229 18 and 60 19, 270 20 mas yr*-1*, for the primary and companion, respectively. The values are consistent within 50 mas yr*-1* as required, but the differences are around 1 error. We note that the centroid positions are likely unreliable, because of the brightness range of the surveys. On the one hand, the primary is out of the linear range of the VHS and on the other hand, the secondary is close to detection limit in 2MASS. Therefore, we employed also the SDSS astrometry, and obtained more precise proper motions by combining 2MASS and SDSS measurements for the M3 star, and VHS and SDSS measurements for the L9 brown dwarf. The resulting values are , = 106 8, 235 8 mas yr*-1* for the M3 and 100 15, 230 15 mas yr*-1* for the L9. This is also in good agreement with the Gaia Data Release 2 measurement for the primary, which gives , = 95.49 0.96, 239.38 0.96 mas yr*-1* (Gaia Collaboration et al., 2016, 2018). To within the quoted uncertainties both objects share the same proper motion, which is shown in Figure 1. These proper motions differ significantly (10) from the population of background field stars (with 17.5 mag and within 20 arcminutes) also shown in the figure.
3 Follow-up observations and data reduction
3.1 Near-infrared spectroscopy
We obtained low-resolution near-IR spectroscopy of the primary NLTT 51469A using the Son of ISAAC (SofI) spectro-imager installed on the NTT on 16 November 2013 (programme ID: 092.C-0874(B), PI: Gauza). SofI is equipped with a Hawaii HgCdTe 10241024 array with 18.5 m pixels. We used the large-field mode, offering a field-of-view of 4.94.9 arcmin with a 0.288 arcsec pixel scale, and blue (950–1640 nm) and red (1530–2520 nm) grisms combined with a slit of 1 arcsec oriented to the parallactic angle. This configuration provides a resolving power of 550. We used single integrations of 60 s and 120 s for blue and red grism, respectively, repeated in an ABBA pattern for both configurations to remove the sky contribution. To correct for telluric absorption features we observed an early type hot star with the same configuration (HD 13936; = 6.46 mag; A0V; van Leeuwen 2007) shortly after NLTT 51469A but at a lower airmass (1.2 vs. 2.4). The sky conditions during the observations were clear with a seeing around 1 arcsecond. During the afternoon preceding the observations we acquired standard calibration frames for data reduction, including bias, spectral flats and Xenon arcs.
We used the ESO SofI pipeline recipes version 1.5.5 within the Gasgano tool to reduce the raw data and to align and combine the dispersed images from the four ABBA positions along the slit to obtain images of the 2D spectra. We then extracted the spectra using standard routines under the apall task in iraf and wavelength calibrated it via Xenon arc lines. The dispersion solution had an rms of 0.54 and 0.62 Å for the blue and red part of the spectrum, respectively, and the resolution of the spectra was 24 Å ( 530) and 35 Å ( 580) in the blue and red arm, respectively. We corrected for telluric lines, dividing the spectra by the A0V standard HD 13936 and multiplying by a blackbody of a corresponding effective temperature of 9700 K.
3.2 Optical spectroscopy
We performed long-slit, low resolution optical spectroscopy of NLTT 51469 and its wide companion using the OSIRIS instrument (Optical System for Imaging and low-intermediate Resolution Integrated Spectroscopy; Cepa, 2010) at the Gran Telescopio de Canarias (GTC) telescope located on the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos (island of La Palma, Spain). OSIRIS is equipped with two 20484096 Marconi CCD42-82 detectors which provides a field-of-view approximately 7 7 arcmin2 with an unbinned pixel scale of 0.125 arcsec.
We observed both objects using a R300R grating with a slit width of 2.5 arcsec and 2 2 binning, which allowed us to measure the general spectral energy distribution at a resolution of 87Å ( 76), covering the 0.5–1.0 m range. Observations were acquired on October 26, 2013 as part of the GTC27-13B program (PI: N. Lodieu). Single exposures of 15 and 600 s were obtained for the primary and secondary, respectively. Bias frames, continuum lamp flat fields, and Xenon, Neon and Argon arcs were obtained during the afternoon preceding the observations. The spectrophotometric standard star G158-100 (Filippenko & Greenstein, 1984; Oke, 1990) was observed on the same night as the scientific target, first using the same spectroscopic setup as for the target, and then also with a broad z-band filter to correct for second-order contamination beyond 9200 Å (see procedure in Zapatero Osorio et al. 2014).
The OSIRIS data were reduced with standard procedures using routines within iraf. The raw spectra were bias-corrected, trimmed and divided by a normalized continuum lamp flat field. From the 2D images we extracted the spectra using the apall routine and calibrated in wavelength with the lines from combined XeNeAr arc lamps. The correction for instrumental response was applied using a response function generated from the spectrophotometric standard star.
To look for spectral signatures of age like e.g., the lithium Li i line at 670.8 nm or H emission at 656.3 nm and also to obtain additional measurement of radial velocity of the primary star, we acquired intermediate-resolution ( 5000) optical spectroscopy of NLTT 51469 using the Fibre-fed RObotic Dual-beam Optical Spectrograph (FRODOSpec; Morales-Rueda et al. 2004) on the robotic Liverpool Telescope (LT; Steele et al. 2004) in La Palma. The FRODOSpec is a 12 12 fibre integral-field unit spectrograph for the LT, designed mainly to study point sources. Each fibre covers a field of view on sky of 0.83″ 0.83″, corresponding to a total field of view of approximately 10″ 10″ (Morales-Rueda et al., 2004; Barnsley et al., 2012). It uses a dichroic beam-splitter to separate the incident light at around 5750Å, into the blue and red arm, covering in the high resolution mode 3900–5100Å and 5900-8000Å, respectively.
We used the Volume Phase Holographic (VPH) grating available on the instrument, which provides higher resolution ( 5300 in red arm) than the conventional diffraction grating. Observations of NLTT 51469 were performed on July 24, 2016. Two individual exposures of 600 s integrations were collected. A radial velocity standard star GJ 873 was observed with the same instrumental setup and 30 s integrations on 20 August, 2016. The Xenon arcs and Tungsten lamp exposures were acquired prior to each target. Raw FRODOSpec data were reduced by two sequentially invoked automatic pipelines. The first one, known as the L1, processes the CCD images performing bias subtraction, overscan trimming and flat fielding. The second one (L2) performs the processing appropriate to integral field spectra reduction. Details of the processing steps of the two pipelines are described in Barnsley et al. (2012). The reduced data products contain a snapshot of the data taken at key stages in the reduction process, including the final sky subtracted and wavelength calibrated 1D spectra. No correction of the instrumental response was applied.
Since the KI line at 766.5 nm is strongly affected by telluric lines we applied a telluric correction to measure the pEW of these lines. For this purpose, we divided the spectrum of the target by the spectrum of a hot, early type star (BD+28 4211, sdO) observed on the same night. The spectrum of telluric star was first normalized in the whole spectral range except parts affected by telluric absorption. We only used this telluric corrected spectrum for this purpose, because the S/N of the telluric star spectrum was poor and introduced more noise to the rest of the spectrum of our target.
3.3 NOT/FastCam lucky imaging
On November 16th 2016, we collected 5,000 individual frames of NLTT 51469 in the I band using the lucky imaging FastCam instrument (Oscoz et al., 2008) at the 2.4m Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) at the Observatorio del Roque de Los Muchcachos in La Palma, with 30 ms exposure time for each frame. FastCam is an optical imager with a low noise EMCCD camera which allows to obtain speckle-featuring not saturated images at a high frame rate. In order to construct a high spatial resolution, diffraction limited, long-exposure image, the individual frames were bias subtracted, aligned, and co-added using our own lucky imaging algorithm (Labadie et al., 2011; Velasco et al., 2016). Figure 4 presents the high resolution image constructed by co-addition of the best percentage of the images using the lucky imaging and shift-and-add method and processed with the wavelet filtering algorithm. Owing to the atmospheric conditions of the night, the selection of 10% of the individual frames was found to be the best solution to produce a deep and diffraction limited image of the target, resulting in a total integration time of 15 s. To calibrate the plate scale and orientation we used observations of the M15 globular cluster core performed on the same night compared against the HST WFPC2 catalog of M15 (van der Marel et al., 2002).
3.4 Clay/MagAO imaging
We observed NLTT 51469 using the Magellan Clay telescope at Las Campanas Observatory in Chile on the night of May 2, 2018. Observations were performed in the -band using the infrared camera Clio-2 in the narrow mode which provides a field-of-view of 16″ 8″(Morzinski et al., 2015). We nodded in an ABBA pattern to subtract the background and obtained 5 frames of 10 s integration at each nod position. In the same manner we acquired shallow, unsaturated images with shorter, 0.5 s individual integrations for the photometry. Shortly after the science target we observed the binary star 70 Oph which has an accurately determined orbit (Pourbaix, 2000) for the calibration of the pixel scale and orientation.
We reduced the raw data cubes using PyRAF routines, which included subtraction of the proper nod-pairs to remove the sky contribution, registering, aligning and median stacking of the individual frames. From the obtained image of 70 Oph we calculated the plate scale of 15.523 0.254 mas/pix and the NORTHClio angle of 1.78 0.40 deg. The NORTHClio angle is then used to find the derotation angle needed to get the North-up and East-left orientation. These values are consistent with the nominal values of 15.846 0.064 mas/pix and NORTHClio = 1.797 0.34 deg provided in Morzinski et al. (2015). A 3 3 arcsec cut-off of the final derotated image of the pair is presented in Figure 4
3.5 VLT/NACO imaging
We also acquired near-IR images of the primary using the NACO instrument, short for the Nasmyth Adaptive Optics System (NAOS, Rousset et al. (2003)) of the VLT-UT1, coupled to the CONICA high contrast infrared camera (Lenzen et al., 1998). Observations were completed on October 24, 2018 (programme ID 0102.C-0899(A), PI Gauza), at average airmass of 1.1 and with thin cirrus clouds. We used the infrared wavefront sensor with the N90C10 dichroic, and our target star as a natural guide star. We chose high sensitivity mode of CONICA with the FowlerNsamp read-out and the S13 objective which provides 14″14″ field of view and the smallest available pixel scale of 13.26 0.03 mas/pix (Masciadri et al., 2003). Individual exposures of 60 and 20 s were taken in a 5 and 9 position jittering pattern for the and , filters, respectively, for a proper sky background subtraction. In the same observing block, with the same setup and observing technique we also obtained band images of a known binary star WDS 20204+0118 (Mason et al., 2001) for pixel scale and orientation calibration.
Raw images were processed using the ESO NACO pipeline kit version 4.4.6, run within the Gasgano software tool, version 2.4.8. This included the dark and flat field corrections, sky subtraction, alignment of individual frames and stacking of each frameset. Astrometric and photometric measurements obtained from the final reduced images are described in Section 5.
4 Spectral classification
We based the spectral type determination for the two components of this system on the low-resolution spectra, optical and near-IR for the primary, and optical for the wide companion. To classify the objects in a qualitative manner, we went through a direct visual comparison of the spectra with a set of known field dwarf spectral templates, separately in the optical and near-IR regimes. The optical spectra of known M dwarf templates were retrieved from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000) spectroscopic database provided by Bochanski et al. (2007). This database contains a repository of good-quality composite spectra of low-mass dwarfs (M0–L0), one per subclass, spanning the 380–940 nm wavelength range. In the near-IR we used the M-dwarf spectral templates available in the IRTF Spectral Library222http://irtfweb.ifa.hawaii.edu/~spex/IRTF_Spectral_Library/, which provides 2000 spectra with S/N 100 over the 0.8–2.5 m range.
In Figure 2 we display the optical and near-IR spectra (left and right panel, respectively) of NLTT 51469A overplotted with a grid of best matching spectral templates. Regions contaminated by strong telluric absorption in the near-IR spectra around 1.4 and 1.9 m were not considered in the comparison and are cleared for display. Also, the region at 1.15 m (in the -band) appears to be affected by poor telluric correction. This may be due to the difference in airmass between the target and the standard star, nonetheless this does not preclude the spectral type classification which makes use of the full spectral range. The M dwarfs used as comparison objects in the near-IR are HD 95735 (M2V), Gl 388 (M3V) and Gl 213 (M4V) (Rayner et al., 2009; Cushing et al., 2005). Figure 3 contains a comparison of optical spectrum of the brown dwarf co-moving with NLTT 51469A with a grid of L8–T0 field dwarf spectra. The known objects used as templates are SDSS J085758.45+570851.4 (L8 1), SDSS J083008.12+482847.4 (L9 1), 2MASS J03284265+2302051 (L9.5 0.5) and SDSS J042348.57-041403.5AB (T0 0.5) and their data were taken from Golimowski et al. (2004); Knapp et al. (2004) and Chiu et al. (2006). The broad feature shortward of 1 micron in the spectrum of the object is due to lack of telluric correction.
For the primary we determine a spectral type of M3.0 dwarf with a one subclass uncertainty, considering both optical and near-IR spectra. For the companion we assign a spectral type of L9, with a one subclass uncertainty, using its optical spectrum. The M3 primary does not show strong molecular absorption due to CaH in the optical spectrum, thus indicating that this star is not a metal-depleted source, which contrasts with the results of the RAVE 4th data release catalog (Kordopatis et al. (2013); [m/H] = 2.31 0.18). Indeed, as shown in Figure 2, the optical spectrum of the primary is nicely reproduced by field, high-gravity solar-metallicity stars. The L9 1 type is consistent with the previous determination by Chiu et al. (2006) who classified the object using 0.8–2.5 m near-IR spectra.
The optical/near-IR/mid-IR multi-band colours of the primary: = 2.38 0.03, = 1.35 0.05, = 0.80 0.05, = 0.15 0.05 mag are compatible with the colors of M2–M4V spectral type standards (Kirkpatrick & McCarthy, 1994; Pecaut & Mamajek, 2013). The brown dwarf companion, with = 2.66 0.12, = 0.81 0.03, = 1.43 0.03 and = 2.41 0.09 mag also shows an agreement with the typical colors of field age late-L dwarfs, however a large scatter of 0.5 mag and similarity of these colors of L5–T0 objects (Chiu et al., 2006; Dupuy & Liu, 2012) prevents a more precise distinction of the spectral type from photometry.
5 Binarity of the NLTT 51469 star
We have analysed the FastCam, Clio-2 and NACO images at the three epochs spanning a 1.9 yr baseline. Using imcentroid and adopting the instrument angle and pixel scale of FastCam at NOT of 30.5 0.1 mas/pix determined from astrometric calibrations using the M15 cluster images, we have measured a relative angular separation between the NLTT 51469A star and the additional nearby source of =0.625 0.009 arcsec and a position angle of =57.28 0.76 deg. From the Clio-2 observations, using pixel scale and orientation calibrations from Morzinski et al. (2015) we have measured =0.6414 0.0001 arcsec and =56.57 0.13 deg and using our calibrations with 70 Oph, =0.628 0.012 arcsec and =56.59 0.42 deg. From the NACO -band image we have measured =0.638 0.003 arcsec and =55.92 0.13 deg with the instrument angle and 13.24 0.04 mas/pix pixel scale calibrated using the WDS 20204+0118 image in the same band. Considering the proper motion of the primary and the time span from FastCam observation the and would be 1.07 0.02 arcsec and 41.6 0.8 deg if the secondary was a non-related background object.
From these images, we have also measured the relative flux between the two objects using the peak value ratio and psf photometry using the daophot package and determined the relative magnitude difference in each of the four bands. To account for the additional source, which is unresolved in 2MASS and DENIS, we deblended the catalog magnitudes to give the appropriate values of individual components. The magnitudes, angular separations and position angles are listed in Table 1.
Considering the relative high proper motion of the primary star of 260 mas/yr, and the expected magnitude of the secondary star of 14.5 mag, the fainter component should have been detected at the same sky position in the old photographic plates of Digital Sky Survey images if it was a stationary background object. Having the three epoch images we prove that this close pair is indeed co-moving, as the measured angular separations and position angles remain consistent within 1.5. Moreover, the and measured on the earliest and latest epoch observations differ by approximately 40 and 20, respectively, from the values expected in case the secondary was a stationary object.
The probability that these two stars are found in such close proximity by chance is very low. Given the 0.6 arcsec separation and assuming a conservative distance range of 15–50 pc the space volume potentially occupied by the pair is pc3. Of all the Gaia DR2 stars within 100 pc and 20 deg of NLTT 51469A only 0.08% share its proper motion at the 3 level, considering a 5 mas/yr error in the proper motion of the M3. Coupling this with the local space density of 0.06–0.11 stars/pc3 (Reid et al., 2007) we estimate that the probability of a chance alignment in space and motion for these two objects is less than . We can thus conclude that both stellar components are physically bound.
Using the absolute magnitude-spectral type and color-spectral type relations from Pecaut & Mamajek (2013), and the spectral type determination of the primary, we estimate that the secondary is an M6 1 dwarf from the derived relative magnitude differences in the four bands and the photometric colors: , , .
6 Distance
The Gaia DR2 provided the parallax measurement for the primary NLTT 51469, = 21.457 0.611 mas, which translates to a distance of 46.6 1.3 pc. The object at 064 from the primary was not resolved by Gaia, however, NLTT 51469 was tagged as a duplicated source in the DR2 catalog. The brown dwarf companion SDSS 2131–0119 was beyond the detection limit of Gaia. To assess whether it is located at a consistent distance we have estimated its spectrophotometric distance, assuming that the system has the age of the field. We used the VHS , , and WISE W1 and W2 photometry with near- and mid-infrared absolute magnitude versus spectral type relations for field L and T dwarfs defined in Dupuy & Liu (2012) and Filippazzo et al. (2015). In Table 2 we list the obtained estimates and their uncertainties, which take into account uncertainties in spectral type determination, intrinsic scatter of absolute magnitudes of a given spectral type and errors in photometry. The / ratios quantify the difference between the parallactic distance of the primary and the estimated spectrophotometric distance of the L9 relative to the corresponding uncertainties. The values are consistent within the errors for all the considered bands and yield a mean distance of the L9 of 40 11 pc. This distance constraint for the L9 is consistent with the parallactic distance of NLTT 51469 at a level of 1.
We estimated the spectrophotometric distance also for the primary, for which we employed the DENIS and 2MASS photometry, since at these magnitudes the VHS starts to get beyond the linear regime of the detector. To account for the source at 064 being unresolved in DENIS and 2MASS, we use the deblended magnitudes and by considering the mean absolute magnitudes for a given early-mid M sub-type from the compilation of Pecaut & Mamajek (2013) we find = 33 17 pc and = pc. The large errors are mainly due to uncertainty in spectral type, since a range from M2 to M4 implies a 1.5 mag difference in brightness in these bands. The spectrophotometric distance of the primary is slightly lower but consistent with the parallactic distance to within the 2 uncertainty level. The spectrophotometric distance values of both objects also coincide, reinforcing that they are located at the same distance, which is consistent with companionship.
In our further analysis we consider both the Gaia distance to the system, i.e., 46.6 1.3 pc, and the spectrophotometric distance of pc. The corresponding projected orbital separations between the components are 2800–3800 au (M3 and L9) and 22–30 au (M3 and M6). For these two distances, we compare the absolute magnitudes versus colors of the M3, M6 and L9 components on the color-magnitude diagram in Figure 6 with a sequence of K and M stars (Pecaut & Mamajek, 2013) and field late-M, L and T dwarfs with measured parallaxes compiled in Dupuy & Liu (2012).
The components follow the sequence and have photometric colors in agreement with those expected for their spectral type, but, adopting the 46.6 pc distance all the three objects appear about 1 mag brighter than their standard counterparts of the corresponding spectral type. The primary matches better to an M1–M2 and the secondary to an M4–M5 type dwarf. We suggest that this may be due to parallax determination being affected by the companion at 064 unresolved by Gaia.
Evidence has been reported in other similar cases (e.g. 2MASS J0249–0557AB, Dupuy et al. 2018) that the five parameter Gaia DR2 astrometric solutions can be altered, in a systematic way, by the orbital motion of unresolved binaries. Particularly when a relatively small number of independent observation epoch was available (DR2 reports that only 8 visibility periods were used in case of NLTT 51469). The astrometric excess noise of the source in DR2 is mas at a significance of 2202, indicating that indeed the Gaia astrometry of this binary is most likely affected by correlated noise from orbital motion. The parallax is 15 lower than it would be expected from the spectrophotometric distance, but, as noted by Dupuy et al. 2018, DR2 parallax systematics for unresolved binaries can be up to 20. The forthcoming Gaia data release with improved astrometry of non-single stars and with the binary information reported in our paper shall provide a more accurate distance for the system.
7 Companionship of NLTT 51469AB and SDSS 2131–01
To evaluate whether the NLTT 51469 and SDSS 2131–01 objects are physically bound or if they have been found together at this separation due to chance alignment we estimated the probability of finding an L, T-type dwarf in our common proper motion search for companions and that both objects have consistent proper motion within 50 mas/yr.
To calculate the contamination rate of L, T dwarfs we need to determine the density of such objects in the VHS survey down to the limiting magnitude of 2MASS. To do this we have found that about 400 L and Ts are identified in the full VHS area (20000 deg2), implying a surface density of 0.02 objects per square degree, and hence a probability for the presence of an L or T dwarf up to 20 arcmin around a star is 0.67%. To estimate the probability that the companion is not physically related but has a consistent proper motion with the primary we have identified that 548 objects out of 50382 in our HPM catalogue have common proper motion with NLTT 51469, which represents a probability of 1.1%.
Assuming a poissonian distribution, the probability of finding an L or T dwarf whose proper motion is consistent with a nearby NLTT star in our VHS search is given by:
[TABLE]
where is the poissonian probability distribution, the number of stars and the combined probability of finding LT dwarfs with consistent proper motion. For our search we estimate that this probability is 26% (it is relatively low, but not negligible). Considering that SDSS 2131–01 was found at angular separation of 82.3 arcsec, the probability to find such objects within this separation is much lower (0.14%). In this calculation we have not taken into account that additionally, both objects appear to be located at a consistent distance. In summary we conclude that it is highly unlikely that the two components are unrelated objects found by chance alignment, and therefore that the NLTT 51469AB and SDSS 2131–01 is a physically bound multiple system.
8 Physical properties
8.1 Radial velocity, galactic kinematics and age
We employed the LT/FRODOSpec intermediate-resolution red optical spectrum ( 5000, 600–800 nm) of NLTT 51469A, displayed in Fig. 8, to measure its heliocentric radial velocity, at the mean Modified Julian Date, MJD = 57593.061387. We used the cross-correlation method against the M4.5V star GJ 876, which has a known, constant radial velocity of = 0.413 0.124 kms*-1* (Nidever et al., 2002). The cross-correlation was computed using the fxcor task within iraf over 6500–7500 and 7700–7950Å wavelength range containing good signal-to-noise (S/N 50) data not affected by the telluric absorption. We fit a Gaussian function to the peak of the cross-correlation distribution. The resulting relative displacement was corrected for the lunar, diurnal, and annual velocities to obtain the heliocentric radial velocity of NLTT 51469A. We measured = 64.3 9.0 kms*-1*, where the error bar accounts for the uncertainties due to the cross-correlation procedure and the error associated with the velocity of the M4.5V standard star.
The star has a previous radial velocity measurement obtained by Kordopatis et al. (2013) on October 17, 2009 (MJD = 55121), 7 yr before our FRODOSpec observation. These authors obtained = 67.34 2.76 kms*-1*, which is consistent with our determination within the error bars. Gaia DR2 does not provide the radial velocity of the M3 primary, but it does provide = 3654 K. The M6-type companion at 064 induces a radial velocity variation of a maximum semi-amplitude of about 1 km/s over an orbital period of roughly 200 yr for an edge-on, circular orbit. This implies a shift of up to 10 m/s per year for an edge-on orbit, readily measurable with modern spectrographs.
Having the proper motion, radial velocity and parallactic distance we calculated the three components of the Galactic space velocity, , , and of NLTT 51469A applying the formulas given by Johnson & Soderblom (1987). We used the more precise literature value of for the calculation, and derived , , = 8.0 1.8, 82.4 2.1, 30.3 1.7 km s*-1*. The errors take into account the uncertainties of the proper motion, distance, and radial velocity. Figure 7 illustrates the ellipsoids corresponding to well-characterised young stellar moving groups of the solar neighborhood (data compiled from Zuckerman & Song 2004 and Torres et al. 2008) and the space velocity of NLTT 51469. The high and indicate that the star does not belong to any of the nearby young moving groups, its velocities are compatible with velocity dispersions of the thin galactic disk population (Leggett (1992) and references therein).
We used the FRODOSpec spectrum also to look for spectral features recognized as indicators of youth in very low-mass stars. We investigate the lithium content (Li I line at 670.8 nm), the Hα emission line at 656.3 nm and the potassium doublet at 766.5 and 769.9 nm. We did not detect the Li I absorption line with detection upper limit on the pseudo equivalent width (pEW) of 60 mÅ nor Hα emission at the level higher than 0.5 Å. For the K I lines we measure pEWs of 1.0 0.2 and 1.1 0.1 Å.
No significant Hα emission suggests low chromospheric activity, indicative of a spun down M dwarf. The absence of lithium and the relatively high V and W galactic velocities rule out youth. Also, the non-detection in X-rays by the ROSAT All Sky Survey and the GALEX UV detection with NUV = 23.05 0.30 mag (2.2 0.6 Jy) and non-detection in FUV indicate no significant flux excess, as compared to early M dwarfs at young ages until a few hundred Myr, and agrees with ages older than the Hyades at 650 Myr, for which a decay in UV and X-ray flux excess reaches a factor of 20 and 65 (Stelzer et al., 2013; Shkolnik & Barman, 2014). Together these criteria point to the NLTT 51469 system belonging to the thin disk population, with a likely age in the range of 1–5 Gyr.
8.2 Luminosity, mass and effective temperature
We determined the bolometric magnitude and luminosity of the primary using -band photometry from 2MASS, decomposed to account for an additional, unresolved M6 source, and the bolometric corrections (BC) for field M dwarfs from Table 5 in Pecaut & Mamajek (2013). We employed the solar bolometric magnitude of 4.74 mag and obtained = mag and a luminosity of = dex. Errors in this determination include error in distance (parallax), spectral type and photometry. These values correspond to a rather earlier type at around M1.5, whereas for an M31 dwarf one would expect 9.2 mag and a luminosity of dex. As mentioned earlier, this discrepancy may be a result of an error in the parallax determination due to the stellar companion at 0.6 arcsec.
For the estimation of effective temperature and mass we also used the values from the compilation of Pecaut & Mamajek (2013), which for an M3 1 dwarf yield a = 3410 K and = 0.36 . The Gaia parallactic distance implies a higher luminosity than expected for an M3 dwarf and hence mass estimate based on the mass-luminosity relation for main sequence M dwarfs (Benedict et al., 2016) yields a consequently higher range of = 0.42 0.02 . As for the M6 component, based on the values from Pecaut & Mamajek (2013) as reference values for a given spectral type we estimated and mass of 2850 200 K and 0.10 .
For the L9 companion we determined the bolometric magnitude and luminosity using the BC for field-age ultracool dwarfs from Filippazzo et al. (2015) and -band photometry from VHS. Considering = 46.6 1.3 pc we obtained = 15.71 0.25 mag and dex, whereas for = pc we got 16.40 mag and -4.66 dex, taking into account errors in distance, spectral type, photometry and intrinsic scatter of absolute magnitudes at a given spectral type. We then employed the AMES Dusty evolutionary model isochrones (Allard et al., 2001; Allard et al., 2011, 2012) to infer the and mass of the companion for three different ages and solar abundance, using the Gaia distance. We obtained masses between 0.050–0.055, 0.068–0.071 and 0.068–0.071 M*⊙* and temperatures in the range of 1400–1550, 1450–1600 and 1500–1650 K for 1, 5, and 10 Gyr, respectively. From the polynomial relations of and as a function of spectral type for field age objects determined by Filippazzo et al. (2015) the expected luminosity and temperature of an L9-type object is 4.55 0.13 dex and 1300 120 K, respectively. These values are somewhat lower than the ones derived using bolometric corrections, -band photometry and parallactic distance, but consistent within the errors.
9 Conclusions and future prospects
Using the VHS and 2MASS surveys and follow-up imaging and spectroscopic observations we have identified a very low-mass hierarchical triple system, NLTT 51469AB/SDSS 2131–0119, composed of a close stellar binary at an angular separation of 0.64 0.01 arcsec (projected distance of 30 au), and a wide (82.27 0.02 arcsec, 3800 au) co-moving brown dwarf companion. We determined the spectral type of the primary NLTT 51469A and confirm the spectral type of the brown dwarf as an M31 and L91, respectively. We have also estimated the spectral type of the close companion NLTT 51469B to be M61.
The Gaia measurement of the parallax of NLTT 51469 yields a distance of 46.6 1.3 pc. Our spectrophotometric distance estimates are compatible with this, though indicate the possibility of a slightly closer distance (that may be consistent with Gaia uncertainty induced by multiplicity). The matching proper motions and agreement in distance of the M3 and L9 components, and the compatible angular separations and position angles of the M6 component measured at three epochs lead us to the conclusion that the three objects form a physically bound system.
We determined the luminosities, effective temperatures and masses of the three components. It is worth noting that an age near 1 Gyr (at the younger end of the thin disk range) would imply a mass of the L9 brown dwarf at or below 0.055 M*⊙*, and thus preservation of lithium (Magazzu et al., 1993). Intermediate resolution spectroscopy covering the Li i line at 670.8 nm could thus be useful in providing additional age constraints.
Assuming masses of 0.4 for the M3, 0.1 for the M6, and 0.065 for the L9, and given the 3800 au separation of the L9 companion this is certainly one of the systems with the lowest gravitational binding energy ( 2.48 1042 erg). Yet, it can be energetically stable according to Fig. 16 of Close et al. (2007). This might be telling us that the system was not formed in a dense environment, otherwise, encounters with other stars would have disrupted the least massive component. Another possibility is that the system we see today is the result of capture(s) from gravitational interactions with nearby or passing low mass sources. Only by characterizing the long- and short-period orbits and performing an exhaustive analysis of the chemical composition of each individual member of the system, we might be able to assess their origin. The presented system builds up the sample of benchmark objects for studies of the least massive stars and substellar objects, in particular, of brown dwarfs at the L/T transition.
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank the reviewer for his insightful comments that allowed to greatly improve the manuscript.
B.G. acknowledges support from the CONICYT through FONDECYT Postdoctoral Fellowship grant No 3170513. This work is partly financed by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity through the projects AYA2016-79425-C3-2-P. N.L. and V.J.S.B acknowledge support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity through the project AYA2015-69350-C3-2-P. A.P. acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity through the project AYA2015-69350-C3-3-P. Based on observations obtained as part of the VISTA Hemisphere Survey, ESO programme, 179.A-2010 (PI: McMahon) Based on observations collected at the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere under ESO programme 092.C-0874(B). Based on observations made with the Nordic Optical Telescope, operated by the Nordic Optical Telescope Scientific Association at the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos, La Palma, Spain, of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias. This paper includes data obtained using the 6.5 m Magellan Clay Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile. This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. This publication makes use of data products from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia Multilateral Agreement. This research has made use of NASA’s Astrophysics Data System. We have made use of the ROSAT Data Archive of the Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik (MPE) at Garching, Germany. This research has made use of the Washington Double Star Catalog maintained at the U.S. Naval Observatory.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Abazajian et al. (2003) Abazajian K., et al., 2003, AJ , 126, 2081 · doi ↗
- 2Ackerman & Marley (2001) Ackerman A. S., Marley M. S., 2001, Ap J , 556, 872 · doi ↗
- 3Allard et al. (1997) Allard F., Hauschildt P. H., Alexander D. R., Starrfield S., 1997, ARA&A , 35, 137 · doi ↗
- 4Allard et al. (2001) Allard F., Hauschildt P. H., Alexander D. R., Tamanai A., Schweitzer A., 2001, Ap J , 556, 357 · doi ↗
- 5Allard et al. (2011) Allard F., Homeier D., Freytag B., 2011, in Johns-Krull C., Browning M. K., West A. A., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 448, 16th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun. p. 91 ( ar Xiv:1011.5405 )
- 6Allard et al. (2012) Allard F., Homeier D., Freytag B., 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A , 370, 2765 · doi ↗
- 7Barnsley et al. (2012) Barnsley R. M., Smith R. J., Steele I. A., 2012, Astronomische Nachrichten , 333, 101 · doi ↗
- 8Baron et al. (2015) Baron F., et al., 2015, Ap J , 802, 37 · doi ↗
