The thermal, mechanical, structural, and dielectric properties of cometary nuclei after Rosetta
O. Groussin, N. Attree, Y. Brouet, V. Ciarletti, B. Davidsson, G., Filacchione, H. H. Fischer, B. Gundlach, M. Knapmeyer, J. Knollenberg, R., Kokotanekova, E. K\"uhrt, C. Leyrat, D. Marshall, I. Pelivan, Y. Skorov, C., Snodgrass, T. Spohn, F. Tosi

TL;DR
This paper reviews the physical properties of cometary nuclei, especially after the Rosetta mission, highlighting their low density, porosity, weak strength, and heterogeneity, which inform their formation and evolution.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive synthesis of the thermal, mechanical, structural, and dielectric properties of cometary nuclei based on recent observational data, particularly from Rosetta.
Findings
Comets have low density (~480 kg/m^3) and high porosity (70-80%).
Nuclei are weak with tensile strength less than 100 Pa.
Physical properties vary spatially and with depth within the nucleus.
Abstract
The physical properties of cometary nuclei observed today relate to their complex history and help to constrain their formation and evolution. In this article, we review some of the main physical properties of cometary nuclei and focus in particular on the thermal, mechanical, structural and dielectric properties, emphasizing the progress made during the Rosetta mission. Comets have a low density of 480 220 kg m-3 and a low permittivity of 1.9 - 2.0, consistent with a high porosity of 70 - 80 %, are weak with a very low global tensile strength 100 Pa, and have a low bulk thermal inertia of 0 - 60 J K-1 m-2 s-1/2 that allowed them to preserve highly volatiles species (e.g. CO, CO2, CH4, N2) into their interior since their formation. As revealed by 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, the above physical properties vary across the nucleus, spatially at its surface but also with depth. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
