# Time-sync Video Tag Extraction Using Semantic Association Graph

**Authors:** Wenmian Yang, Kun Wang, Na Ruan, Wenyuan Gao, Weijia Jia, Wei Zhao,, Nan Liu, Yunyong Zhang

arXiv: 1905.01053 · 2019-07-05

## TL;DR

This paper introduces an unsupervised algorithm called SW-IDF that constructs a semantic association graph from time-sync comments to accurately extract video tags despite noise, outperforming existing methods.

## Contribution

The paper proposes a novel unsupervised approach using semantic association graphs and clustering algorithms for effective video tag extraction from noisy comments.

## Key findings

- SW-IDF achieves higher F1-score and MAP than state-of-the-art methods.
- The semantic association graph effectively differentiates meaningful comments from noise.
- Performance varies with comment density, but the method remains robust.

## Abstract

Time-sync comments reveal a new way of extracting the online video tags. However, such time-sync comments have lots of noises due to users' diverse comments, introducing great challenges for accurate and fast video tag extractions. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised video tag extraction algorithm named Semantic Weight-Inverse Document Frequency (SW-IDF). Specifically, we first generate corresponding semantic association graph (SAG) using semantic similarities and timestamps of the time-sync comments. Second, we propose two graph cluster algorithms, i.e., dialogue-based algorithm and topic center-based algorithm, to deal with the videos with different density of comments. Third, we design a graph iteration algorithm to assign the weight to each comment based on the degrees of the clustered subgraphs, which can differentiate the meaningful comments from the noises. Finally, we gain the weight of each word by combining Semantic Weight (SW) and Inverse Document Frequency (IDF). In this way, the video tags are extracted automatically in an unsupervised way. Extensive experiments have shown that SW-IDF (dialogue-based algorithm) achieves 0.4210 F1-score and 0.4932 MAP (Mean Average Precision) in high-density comments, 0.4267 F1-score and 0.3623 MAP in low-density comments; while SW-IDF (topic center-based algorithm) achieves 0.4444 F1-score and 0.5122 MAP in high-density comments, 0.4207 F1-score and 0.3522 MAP in low-density comments. It has a better performance than the state-of-the-art unsupervised algorithms in both F1-score and MAP.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.01053/full.md

## Figures

13 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.01053/full.md

## References

63 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.01053/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.01053