# Dynamics of Merging Galaxy Clusters from Simulated Analogs

**Authors:** David Wittman

arXiv: 1905.00375 · 2019-09-04

## TL;DR

This paper uses cosmological simulations to analyze merging galaxy clusters, providing improved estimates of dynamical parameters like time since pericenter and viewing angles, which are crucial for understanding dark matter and galaxy evolution.

## Contribution

It introduces a novel method of extracting dynamical parameters from analog systems in simulations, improving upon previous analytical and staged simulation approaches.

## Key findings

- Derived TSP and viewing angles consistent with hydrodynamical simulations.
- Found lower maximum speeds compared to previous methods.
- Estimated parameters for 11 observed systems with improved accuracy.

## Abstract

Merging galaxy clusters may provide a unique window into the behavior of dark matter and the evolution of member galaxies. To interpret these natural collider experiments we must account for how much time has passed since pericenter passage (TSP), the maximum relative speed of the merging subclusters, merger phase (outbound after first pericenter or returning for second pericenter), and other dynamical parameters that are not directly observable. These quantities are often inferred from staged simulations or analytical timing arguments that include neither substructure, large-scale structure, nor a cosmologically motivated range of impact parameters. We include all these effects by extracting dynamical parameters from analog systems in a cosmological n-body simulation, and we present constraints for 11 observed systems. The TSP and viewing angles we derive are consistent with those of staged hydrodynamical simulations, but we find lower maximum speeds. Compared to the analytical MCMAC method we find lower TSP, and viewing angles that put the separation vector closer to the plane of the sky; we attribute this to the MCMAC assumption of zero pericenter distance. We discuss potential extensions to the basic analog method as well as complementarities between methods.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.00375/full.md

## Figures

17 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.00375/full.md

## References

46 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.00375/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1905.00375