No master (key) No (measurement) problem
Arne Hansen, Stefan Wolf

TL;DR
This paper argues that recent debates and thought experiments do not fundamentally alter the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, emphasizing the need for reflection on the core paradigms of physics.
Contribution
It clarifies that recent discussions do not constitute a paradigm shift but highlight the importance of foundational reflection in quantum physics.
Findings
Recent debates do not challenge the legitimacy of quantum mechanics.
Extended Wigner's-friend experiments do not introduce fundamentally new issues.
The measurement problem calls for paradigm reflection rather than new solutions.
Abstract
Can normal science-in the Kuhnian sense-add something substantial to the discussion about the measurement problem? Does an extended Wigner's-friend Gedankenexperiment illustrate new issues? Or a new quality of known issues? Are we led to new interpretations, new perspectives, or do we iterate the previously known? The recent debate does, as we argue, neither constitute a turning point in the discussion about the measurement problem nor fundamentally challenge the legitimacy of quantum mechanics. Instead, the measurement problem asks for a reflection on fundamental paradigms of doing physics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · History and advancements in chemistry
