# Some results on multithreshold graphs

## TL;DR

This paper investigates the structure of multithreshold graphs, proving that for three thresholds, different threshold choices define infinitely many distinct graph classes, thus answering a longstanding open question.

## Contribution

The paper demonstrates that for three thresholds, the classes of graphs are infinitely many and distinct, resolving Jamison's question about the equivalence of threshold choices.

## Key findings

- Infinitely many distinct classes of 3-threshold graphs exist.
- Different threshold choices can define different graph classes for k ≥ 3.
- Some open problems in multithreshold graphs are identified.

## Abstract

Jamison and Sprague defined a graph $G$ to be a $k$-threshold graph with thresholds $\theta_1 , \ldots, \theta_k$ (strictly increasing) if one can assign real numbers $(r_v)_{v \in V(G)}$, called ranks, such that for every pair of vertices $v,w$, we have $vw \in E(G)$ if and only if the inequality $\theta_i \leq r_v + r_w$ holds for an odd number of indices $i$. When $k=1$ or $k=2$, the precise choice of thresholds $\theta_1, \ldots, \theta_k$ does not matter, as a suitable transformation of the ranks transforms a representation with one choice of thresholds into a representation with any other choice of thresholds. Jamison asked whether this remained true for $k \geq 3$ or whether different thresholds define different classes of graphs for such $k$, offering \$50 for a solution of the problem. Letting $C_t$ for $t > 1$ denote the class of $3$-threshold graphs with thresholds $-1, 1, t$, we prove that there are infinitely many distinct classes $C_t$, answering Jamison's question. We also consider some other problems on multithreshold graphs, some of which remain open.