On the Use of ArXiv as a Dataset
Colin B. Clement, Matthew Bierbaum, Kevin P. O'Keeffe, Alexander A., Alemi

TL;DR
This paper introduces a standardized pipeline to access and analyze arXiv's extensive dataset, including a large citation graph and full-text corpus, to facilitate benchmarking and development of advanced models.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive pipeline for standardized access to arXiv data, enabling large-scale analysis and benchmarking of models on multi-modal scientific literature.
Findings
Constructed a 6.7 million edge citation graph.
Compiled an 11 billion word full-text corpus.
Presented baseline classification results.
Abstract
The arXiv has collected 1.5 million pre-print articles over 28 years, hosting literature from scientific fields including Physics, Mathematics, and Computer Science. Each pre-print features text, figures, authors, citations, categories, and other metadata. These rich, multi-modal features, combined with the natural graph structure---created by citation, affiliation, and co-authorship---makes the arXiv an exciting candidate for benchmarking next-generation models. Here we take the first necessary steps toward this goal, by providing a pipeline which standardizes and simplifies access to the arXiv's publicly available data. We use this pipeline to extract and analyze a 6.7 million edge citation graph, with an 11 billion word corpus of full-text research articles. We present some baseline classification results, and motivate application of more exciting generative graph models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Computing and Data Management · Advanced Graph Neural Networks · Topic Modeling
