Supervised Machine Learning for Eliciting Individual Demand
John A. Clithero, Jae Joon Lee, Joshua Tasoff

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that supervised machine learning significantly improves the accuracy of predicting individual purchase behavior over traditional willingness-to-pay methods, with potential for substantial revenue increases.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach combining supervised machine learning with choice data to enhance demand elicitation accuracy beyond traditional methods.
Findings
SML improves out-of-sample purchase predictions.
Choice data performs comparably to WTP data when used with SML.
Prices set by SML could increase revenue by 28%.
Abstract
Direct elicitation, guided by theory, is the standard method for eliciting latent preferences. The canonical direct-elicitation approach for measuring individuals' valuations for goods is the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak procedure, which generates willingness-to-pay (WTP) values that are imprecise and systematically biased by understating valuations. We show that enhancing elicited WTP values with supervised machine learning (SML) can substantially improve estimates of peoples' out-of-sample purchase behavior. Furthermore, swapping WTP data with choice data generated from a simple task, two-alternative forced choice, leads to comparable performance. Combining all the data with the best-performing SML methods yields large improvements in predicting out-of-sample purchases. We quantify the benefit of using various SML methods in conjunction with using different types of data. Our results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic and Environmental Valuation · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
