Theoretical, Measured and Subjective Responsibility in Aided Decision Making
Nir Douer, Joachim Meyer

TL;DR
This paper introduces the ResQu model, a new quantitative tool that predicts human responsibility and perceptions in interactions with intelligent systems, validated through laboratory experiments.
Contribution
The study develops and empirically tests the ResQu model, linking responsibility predictions with actual and perceived responsibility in human-AI interactions.
Findings
ResQu predictions strongly correlate with actual responsibility.
Bias occurs when humans rely less optimally on superior systems.
Responsibility perceptions are influenced by system capabilities and human biases.
Abstract
When humans interact with intelligent systems, their causal responsibility for outcomes becomes equivocal. We analyze the descriptive abilities of a newly developed responsibility quantification model (ResQu) to predict actual human responsibility and perceptions of responsibility in the interaction with intelligent systems. In two laboratory experiments, participants performed a classification task. They were aided by classification systems with different capabilities. We compared the predicted theoretical responsibility values to the actual measured responsibility participants took on and to their subjective rankings of responsibility. The model predictions were strongly correlated with both measured and subjective responsibility. A bias existed only when participants with poor classification capabilities relied less-than-optimally on a system that had superior classification…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
