TL;DR
This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Global Wind Atlas and local measurements for bias correction of MERRA-2 wind data in Brazil, revealing that GWA improves large-scale results but not local wind park predictions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of bias correction methods across multiple spatial levels in Brazil, comparing global and local data sources for wind power simulation.
Findings
GWA improves large-scale wind power simulation results.
Local measurements perform similarly to GWA for bias correction.
Complex interpolation methods do not significantly enhance simulation accuracy.
Abstract
NASAs MERRA-2 reanalysis is a widely used dataset in renewable energy resource modelling. The Global Wind Atlas (GWA) has been used to bias-correct MERRA-2 data before. There is, however, a lack of an analysis of the performance of MERRA-2 with bias correction from GWA on different spatial levels - and for regions outside of Europe, China or the United States. This study therefore evaluates different methods for wind power simulation on four spatial resolution levels from wind park to national level in Brazil. In particular, spatial interpolation methods and spatial as well as spatiotemporal wind speed bias correction using local wind speed measurements and mean wind speeds from the GWA are assessed. By validating the resulting timeseries against observed generation it is assessed at which spatial levels the different methods improve results - and whether global information derived from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
