# X-ray properties of two transient ULX candidates in galaxy NGC 7090

**Authors:** Zhu Liu (NAOC, University of Leicester), P.T. O'Brien (University of, Leicester), J.P. Osborne (University of Leicester), P.A. Evans (University of, Leicester), and K.L. Page (University of Leicester)

arXiv: 1904.13044 · 2019-05-08

## TL;DR

This study analyzes the X-ray behavior of two transient ultraluminous X-ray sources in galaxy NGC 7090, revealing significant flux variability, spectral changes in one source, and potential optical counterparts, contributing to understanding ULX properties.

## Contribution

First detailed analysis of the spectral variability and optical counterparts of two transient ULXs in NGC 7090, highlighting their flux changes and spectral states.

## Key findings

- X1 showed flux increases >80 and >300 times, with spectral variability.
- X2 exhibited stable spectral properties with no strong variability.
- Potential optical counterpart for X1 suggests a companion star.

## Abstract

We report the X-ray data analysis of two transient ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs, hereafter X1 and X2) located in the nearby galaxy NGC 7090. While they were not detected in the 2004 XMM-Newton and 2005 Chandra observations, their 0.3-10 keV X-ray luminosities reached $>3\times10^{39}\,\mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}}$ in later XMM-Newton or Swift observations, showing increases in flux by a factor of $>80$ and $>300$ for X1 and X2, respectively. X1 showed indications of spectral variability: at the highest luminosity, its X-ray spectra can be fitted with a powerlaw ($\Gamma=1.55\pm0.15$), or a multicolour disc model with $T_{\mathrm{in}}=2.07^{+0.30}_{-0.23}$ keV; the X-ray spectrum became softer ($\Gamma=2.67^{+0.69}_{-0.64}$), or cooler ($T_\mathrm{in}=0.64^{+0.28}_{-0.17}$ keV) at lower luminosity. No strong evidence for spectral variability was found for X2. Its X-ray spectra can be fitted with a simple powerlaw model ($\Gamma=1.61^{+0.55}_{-0.50}$), or a multicolour disc model ($1.69^{+1.17}_{-0.48}$ keV). A possible optical counterpart for X1 is revealed in HST imaging. No optical variability is found, indicating that the optical radiation may be dominated by the companion star. Future X-ray and optical observations are necessary to determine the true nature of the compact object.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.13044/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.13044/full.md

## References

53 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.13044/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1904.13044