On generalized quasi-Einstein GRW space-times
Uday Chand De, Sameh Shenawy

TL;DR
This paper investigates generalized quasi-Einstein GRW space-times, showing they have constant scalar curvature and reduce to Einstein or perfect fluid space-times, expanding understanding of their geometric and physical properties.
Contribution
It demonstrates that generalized quasi-Einstein GRW space-times necessarily have constant scalar curvature and simplifies to known space-times, clarifying their structure.
Findings
Generalized quasi-Einstein GRW space-times have constant scalar curvature.
Such space-times reduce to Einstein or perfect fluid space-times.
The results extend the classification of GRW space-times.
Abstract
Recently, it is proven that generalized Robertson-Walker space-times in all orthogonal subspaces of Gray's decomposition but one(unrestricted) are perfect fluid space-times. GRW space-times in the unrestricted subspace are identified by having constant scalar curvature. Generalized quasi-Einstein GRW space-times have a constant scalar curvature. It is shown that generalized quasi-Einstein GRW space-times reduce to Einstein space-times or perfect fluid space-times.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
On generalized quasi-Einstein GRW space-times
Uday Chand De
Department of Pure Mathematics, University of Calcutta
35, Ballygaunge Circular Road
Kolkata 700019, West Bengal, India,
and
Sameh Shenawy
Basic Science Department, Modern Academy for Engineering and Technology, Maadi, Egypt,
Abstract.
Recently, it is proven that generalized Robertson-Walker space-times in all orthogonal subspaces of Gray’s decomposition but one(unrestricted) are perfect fluid space-times. GRW space-times in the unrestricted subspace are identified by having constant scalar curvature. Generalized quasi-Einstein GRW space-times have a constant scalar curvature. It is shown that generalized quasi-Einstein GRW space-times reduce to Einstein space-times or perfect fluid space-times.
Key words and phrases:
Quasi-Einstein manifolds, Perfect fluid space-times, Generalized Robertson-Walker space-times, Einstein manifolds
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 53C25; Secondary 83F05
1. Introduction
The warped product of an open connected interval of and a Riemannian manifold with warping function is called a generalized Robertson-Walker space-time(or GRW space-times)[12, 15]. This family of Lorentzian space-times broadly extends the classical Robertson-Walker space-times, Friedmann cosmological models, Einstein-de Sitter space-times and many others[2, 15]. The classical Robertson-Walker spacetime is regarded as cosmological models since it is spatially homogeneous and spatially isotropic whereas GRW space-times serve as inhomogeneous extension of Robertson-Walker space-times that admit an isotropic radiation[2](see also [4, 15]). A Lorentzian manifold is called a perfect fluid space-time if the Ricci tensor takes the form
[TABLE]
where are scalars and is a form metrically equivalent to a unit time-like vector field[13, 14]. Perfect fluid space-times in the language of differential geometry are called quasi-Einstein spaces where is metrically equivalent to a unit space-like vector field. Recently, in [14], it is proven that a perfect fluid space-time with divergence-free conformal curvature tensor is a GRW space-time with Einstein fibers given that the scalar curvature is constant. Many sufficient conditions on perfect fluid space-times to be a GRW space-time are derived.
Gray presented an invariant orthogonal decomposition of the covariant derivative of the Ricci tensor[5](see also [10]). Recently, Carlo Mantica et al proved that the Ricci tensor of a generalized Robertson-Walker space-time in all classes of Gray’s decomposition but is either Einstein or takes the form of a perfect fluid whereas is not restricted[13]. The class is characterized by i.e. the scalar curvature is constant. Now, the following question arises.
Does the Ricci tensor of all GRW space-times in reduce to be Einstein or take the form of a perfect fluid?
In this work, we get a partial positive answer. A (pseudo-)Riemannian manifold is called a generalized quasi-Einstein manifold if its Ricci curvature satisfies
[TABLE]
where and are non-zero constants, and are forms corresponding to two orthonormal vector field[1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9]. If , then reduces to a quasi-Einstein manifold. It is clear that generalized quasi-Einstein space-times are generally imperfect fluid space-times with constant scalar curvature . However, we prove that generalized quasi-Einstein GRW space-times are either Einstein or perfect fluid space-times.
Remark 1**.**
It is noted that any vector field orthogonal to a time-like vector field is space-like. Thus the generators couldn’t be time-like. Now, one may assume that one of the generators is time-like and the other is space-like. Generally, the results of this article still hold in this case with minor changes.
2. Notes on generalized quasi-Einstein manifolds
Let be a generalized quasi-Einstein (pseudo-)Riemannian manifold i.e.
[TABLE]
where and . The trace of this equations gives
[TABLE]
It is noted that
[TABLE]
and consequently . Hence we can state the following result.
Proposition 1**.**
Let be a generalized quasi-Einstein manifold with generators and . Then the scalar curvature is
[TABLE]
Now assume that is an eigenvector of the Ricci tensor with eigenvalue i.e. . A contraction of Equation (2.1) with yields
[TABLE]
implies . Thus and . If is an eigenvector of the Ricci tensor with eigenvalue , then
[TABLE]
infers
[TABLE]
Consequently, and . Conversely, assume that is a quasi-Einstein manifold with generator . Then
[TABLE]
yields
[TABLE]
Also,
[TABLE]
This leads to the following.
Theorem 1**.**
Let be a generalized quasi-Einstein manifold. Then, reduces to a quasi-Einstein manifold if and only if one of the generators is an eigenvector of the Ricci tensor.
The covariant derivative of the Ricci tensor of a generalized quasi-Einstein manifold is given by
[TABLE]
and hence
[TABLE]
Thus, the Codazzi deviation tensor is
[TABLE]
Now, we have the following cases
[TABLE]
Thus, for a Codazzi Ricci tensor, the generators are both closed. In this case,
[TABLE]
Thus we have the following.
Proposition 2**.**
Let be a generalized quasi-Einstein manifold. Assume that is Einstein-like of class (i.e. the Ricci tensor is a Codazzi tensor). Then and are closed. Moreover,
[TABLE]
A contraction of by and then by the generators and infers
[TABLE]
Thus .
Assume that is Einstein-like of class ( that is, the Ricci tensor is a parallel, ). Then,
[TABLE]
Contractions by and imply
[TABLE]
Assume that is not parallel, then . Thus we conclude.
Theorem 2**.**
Let be a Ricci-symmetric generalized quasi-Einstein manifold. Then, is Einstein if the generator is not covariantly constant.
3. Generalized quasi-Einstein GRW space-times
A Lorentzian manifold is a GRW space-time if and only if has a unit time-like vector field such that
[TABLE]
which is also an eigenvector of the Ricci tensor i.e. for some scalar functions and [11, 12, 13]. We say that is a nontrivial torse-forming vector field if . This characterization is an alternative of Chen’s theorem in [2]. If is a generalized quasi-Einstein manifold, then
[TABLE]
A contraction by yields
[TABLE]
which implies
[TABLE]
and hence
[TABLE]
Two different contractions by the generators give
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
and hence
[TABLE]
It is clear that is not a linear combination of and only since is time-like whereas and are orthonormal space-like fields so . Therefore,
[TABLE]
It is noted that if is not zero. Suppose that does not vanish. Then Equation (3.3) implies that either or . The later case with Equation (3.2) yield i.e. is quasi-Einstein if . Now, assume that is orthogonal to both the generators i.e. . The Ricci tensor of a GQE manifold is
[TABLE]
and so
[TABLE]
A contraction by implies
[TABLE]
It is noted that is an eigenvector of the Ricci tensor ( i.e. ) and . Thus
[TABLE]
So is Einstein if is a nontrivial torse-forming vector field.
Theorem 3**.**
Let be a generalized quasi-Einstein GRW space-time. Then i.e. is the eigenvalue of the eigenvector and
- (1)
* reduces to be Einstein space-time if is orthogonal to both the generators provided .* 2. (2)
* reduces to be Einstein space-time if is not orthogonal to first generator.* 3. (3)
* reduces to be perfect fluid space-time if is not orthogonal to the second generator.*
Corollary 1**.**
Let be a generalized quasi-Einstein Lorentzian manifold admitting a unit time-like non-trivial torse-forming vector field. Then reduces to an Einstein GRW space-time or a perfect fluid GRW space-time.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Chaki, M. C. On generalized quasi Einstein manifolds , Publ. Math. Debrecen 58 (2001): 683-691.
- 2[2] Chen, Bang-Yen. A simple characterization of generalized Robertson–Walker spacetimes , General Relativity and Gravitation 46, no. 12 (2014): 1833.
- 3[3] De, Avik, Ahmet Yildiz, and Uday Chand De. On Generalized Quasi Einstein Manifolds, Filomat 28, no. 4 (2014): 811-820.
- 4[4] Ehlers, Jurgen, P. Geren, and Rainer K. Sachs. ” Isotropic Solutions of the Einstein-Liouville Equations .” Journal of Mathematical Physics 9, no. 9 (1968): 1344-1349.
- 5[5] Gray, Alfred. ” Einstein-like manifolds which are not Einstein . Geometriae dedicata 7, no. 3 (1978): 259-280.
- 6[6] Guler, Sinem, and Sezgin Altay Demirbag. On Ricci symmetric generalized quasi Einstein spacetimes , Miskolc Mathematical Notes 16, no. 2 (2015): 853-868.
- 7[7] Guler, Sinem, and Sezgin Altay Demirbag. A Study of Generalized Quasi Einstein Spacetimes with Applications in General Relativity , International Journal of Theoretical Physics 55, no. 1 (2016): 548-562.
- 8[8] Guler, Sinem, and Sezgin Altay Demirbag. Riemannian Manifolds Satisfying Certain Conditions on Pseudo-Projective Curvature Tensor , Filomat 30, no. 3 (2016): 721-731.
